| Literature DB >> 36230452 |
Mengli Cao1,2, Xingdong Wang1,2, Shaoke Guo1,2, Yandong Kang1,2, Jie Pei1,2, Xian Guo1,2.
Abstract
Male-derived sterility in cattle-yaks, a hybrid deriving from yak and cattle, is a challenging problem. This study compared and analyzed the histomorphological differences in testis between sexually mature yak and cattle-yak, and examined the transcriptome differences employing RNA-seq. The study found that yak seminiferous tubules contained spermatogenic cells at all levels, while cattle-yak seminiferous tubules had reduced spermatogonia (SPG) and primary spermatocyte (Pri-SPC), fewer secondary spermatocytes (Sec-SPC), an absence of round spermatids (R-ST) and sperms (S), and possessed large vacuoles. All of these conditions could have significantly reduced the volume and weight of cattle-yak testis compared to that of yak. RNA-seq analysis identified 8473 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; 3580 upregulated and 4893 downregulated). GO (Gene Ontology) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) enrichment evaluations for DEGs found their relation mostly to spermatogenesis and apoptosis. Among the DEGs, spermatogonia stem cell (SSCs) marker genes (Gfra1, CD9, SOHLH1, SALL4, ID4, and FOXO1) and genes involved in apoptosis (Fas, caspase3, caspase6, caspase7, caspase8, CTSK, CTSB and CTSC) were significantly upregulated, while differentiation spermatogenic cell marker genes (Ccna1, PIWIL1, TNP1, and TXNDC2) and meiosis-related genes (TEX14, TEX15, MEIOB, STAG3 and M1AP) were significantly downregulated in cattle-yak. Furthermore, the alternative splicing events in cattle-yak were substantially decreased than in yak, suggesting that the lack of protein subtypes could be another reason for spermatogenic arrest in cattle-yak testis.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-seq; cattle-yak; testicular tissue; yak
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230452 PMCID: PMC9559613 DOI: 10.3390/ani12192711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Histomorphological observation of testis. (a) Yak testis, (b) cattle-yak testis, (c) yak and (d) cattle-yak testis tissue sections 10×, and (e) yak and (f) cattle-yak testis tissue sections 60×.
Morphological parameters of testis.
| Index | Yak | Cattle-Yak |
|---|---|---|
| Testicular circumference (cm) | 14.75 ± 0.44 ** | 9.83 ± 0.51 |
| Testicular length (cm) | 12.31 ± 0.66 * | 11.10 ± 0.75 |
| Testicular weight (g) | 88.77 ± 2.68 ** | 60.02 ± 2.20 |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Histological parameters of testis.
| Index | Yak | Cattle-Yak |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter of seminiferous tubules (μm) | 238.47 ± 19.06 ** | 175.82 ± 18.41 |
| Seminiferous tubule wall thickness (μm) | 2.95 ± 0.55 * | 2.41 ± 0.41 |
| SPG diameter (μm) | 13.26 ± 1.14 ** | 8.97 ± 0.76 |
| Pri-SPC diameter (μm) | 17.03 ± 0.98 ** | 14.04 ± 1.19 |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Mapping results with yak reference genome.
| Sample | Total Reads | Total Mapped Reads | Multiple Mapped Reads | Uniquely Mapped Reads |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 46,495,404 | 43,312,320 (93.15%) | 5,154,644 (11.09%) | 38,157,676 (82.07%) |
| C2 | 46,067,720 | 42,690,813 (92.67%) | 4,899,340 (10.64%) | 37,791,473 (82.03%) |
| C3 | 45,021,512 | 42,007,249 (93.30%) | 5,055,431 (11.23%) | 36,951,818 (82.08%) |
| Y1 | 46,352,778 | 44,083,089 (95.10%) | 5,540,645 (11.95%) | 38,542,444 (83.15%) |
| Y2 | 46,675,930 | 44,335,303 (94.99%) | 5,586,382 (11.97%) | 38,748,921 (83.02%) |
| Y3 | 45,556,352 | 43,289,125 (95.02%) | 5,512,059 (12.10%) | 37,777,066 (82.92%) |
Figure 2Protein-coding gene expression analysis. (a) Boxplot of gene FPKM values in respective samples, (b) FPKM expression distribution map, (c) heatmap showing correlation analysis, (d) PCA diagram, (e) differential expression volcano plot and (f) differential gene grouping cluster map (Protein-coding genes with comparatively high and low expression are denoted by red and blue, respectively). C: cattle-yak, Y: yak.
Figure 3GO/KEGG analyses of DEGs. GO enrichment evaluations for (a) up-regulated and (b) down-regulated DEGs within cattle-yak. KEGG enrichment evaluations for (c) up-regulated and (d) down-regulated DEGs in cattle-yak. Go enrichment analysis ranks 10 entries from large to small according to the respective −log10p-value. KEGG analysis shows some significant enrichment results.
Figure 4RT-qPCR validation of RNA-seq data and AS analysis. (a) RT-qPCR results for YIPF1, ATG10, SUN2, LIPG, SDK1, and SAXO1 genes within cattle-yak and yak groups. ** p < 0.01. (b) Level of differing AS events within cattle-yak/yak groups. C: cattle-yak, Y: yak.