| Literature DB >> 36016801 |
Xingdong Wang1,2, Jie Pei1,2, Shaoke Guo1,2, Mengli Cao1,2, Yandong Kang1,2, Lin Xiong1,2, Yongfu La1,2, Pengjia Bao1,2, Chunnian Liang1,2, Ping Yan1,2, Xian Guo1,2.
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most common form of eukaryotic mRNA modification, and it has been shown to exhibit broad regulatory activity in yeast, plants, and mammals. The specific role of m6A methylation as a regulator of spermatogenesis, however, has yet to be established. In this experiment, through a series of preliminary studies and methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing, the m6A map of cattle-yak testicular tissue was established as a means of exploring how m6A modification affects cattle-yak male infertility. Cattle-yak testis tissues used in this study were found to contain sertoli cells and spermatogonia. Relative to sexually mature yak samples, those isolated from cattle-yak testis exhibited slightly reduced levels of overall methylation, although these levels were significantly higher than those in samples from pre-sexually mature yaks. Annotation analyses revealed that differentially methylated peaks were most concentrated in exonic regions, with progressively lower levels of concentration in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) and 5'-UTR regions. To further explore the role of such m6A modification, enrichment analyses were performed on differentially methylated and differentially expressed genes in these samples. For the cattle-yaks vs. 18-months-old yaks group comparisons, differentially methylated genes were found to be associated with spermatogenesis-related GO terms related to the cytoskeleton and actin-binding, as well as with KEGG terms related to the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and the MAPK signaling pathway. Similarly, enrichment analyses performed for the cattle-yaks vs. 5-years-old yaks comparison revealed differentially methylated genes to be associated with GO terms related to protein ubiquitination, ubiquitin ligase complexes, ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism, and endocytotic activity, as well as with KEGG terms related to apoptosis and the Fanconi anemia pathway. Overall, enrichment analyses for the cattle-yaks vs. 18-months-old yaks comparison were primarily associated with spermatogenesis, whereas those for the cattle-yaks vs. 5-years-old yaks comparison were primarily associated with apoptosis.Entities:
Keywords: N6-methyladenosine; cattle-yak; male sterility; spermatogenesis; testicular tissue
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016801 PMCID: PMC9395605 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.971515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Cattle-yak testicular tissue sections. (A) 10× magnification; (B,C) 40× magnification.
Figure 2Analyses of m6A levels in yak and cattle-yak testicular tissues. (A) Overall levels of testis tissue methylation. Y: 18-months-old yak, T: cattle-yak, M: 5-years-old yak, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. (B) Methylation-related enzyme expression in the indicated yak groups. Different lowercase letters correspond to significant differences among groups (P < 0.05), whereas identical letters indicate a lack of any significant differences (P > 0.05).
The numbers of methylation peaks in each width range.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 1–1,000 | 8,059 |
| 1,001–5,000 | 4,122 |
| 5,001–10,000 | 1,672 |
| 10,001–50,000 | 1,981 |
| 50,001–100,000 | 247 |
| >100,000 | 105 |
Figure 3Cattle-yak methylation peak analyses. (A) mRNA methylation peak distributions. (B) IGV plots demonstrating peaks in the VGLL3 and DONSON genes. (C) The motifs most commonly subjected to m6A modification in cattle-yak testicular samples.
Figure 4Identification and annotation of differentially methylated peaks. (A,B) Volcano plots demonstrating differentially methylated peak distributions. (C) Pie charts representing the annotation of DMPs associated with different gene regions.
Figure 5Enrichment analyses. (A) GO analyses for the T vs. Y group. (B) KEGG analyses for the T vs. Y group. (C) GO analyses for the T vs. M group. (D) KEGG analyses for the T vs. M group.
Figure 6Functional enrichment analyses for DEGs. (A) GO analyses for the T vs. Y group. (B) KEGG analyses for the T vs. Y group. (C) DEG statistics. (D) GO analyses for the T vs. M group. (E) KEGG analyses for the T vs. M group.
Figure 7Combined analyses of differentially expressed and differentially methylated genes. (A) A combined four-quadrant scatterplot highlighting genes exhibiting significantly altered methylation and expression patterns when comparing the indicated samples, with gray dots corresponding to genes that did not exhibit any significant differences. (B) qPCR-based validation of DEGs identified via RNA-seq analyses. **P < 0.01, *P<0.05.