| Literature DB >> 36225687 |
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between work passion and work engagement among university music teachers in flow experience and teaching well-being.Entities:
Keywords: flow experience; teaching well-being; university music teachers; work engagement; work passion
Year: 2022 PMID: 36225687 PMCID: PMC9548981 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1The conceptual model and research hypotheses of this study.
Social demographic features of participants (N = 343).
| Variables | Percentages |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 46.94% |
| Female | 53.06% |
| Age | |
| 30–32 | 56.56% |
| 33–35 | 27.99% |
| 36–38 | 6.12% |
| 39–41 | 3.79% |
| 42–44 | 5.54% |
| Title | |
| Teaching assistant | 11.08% |
| Lecturer | 72.30% |
| Associate professor | 11.66% |
| Professor | 4.96% |
Means, standard deviations, and correlations of the major study variables.
| Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Gender | 0.469 | 0.500 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Age | 33.430 | 2.977 | 0.03 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Title | 2.100 | 0.645 | 0.055 | 0.872** | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| 4. CSB | 3.478 | 0.827 | −0.021 | 0.034 | 0.033 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5. AAM | 3.421 | 0.860 | 0.006 | 0.038 | 0.037 | 0.559** | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 6. CG | 3.442 | 0.878 | −0.002 | 0.06 | 0.062 | 0.539** | 0.559** | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 7. UFB | 3.322 | 0.877 | −0.007 | 0.053 | 0.081 | 0.488** | 0.434** | 0.520** | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 8. COTTAH | 3.436 | 0.880 | 0.004 | −0.045 | −0.005 | 0.532** | 0.559** | 0.591** | 0.557** | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 9. SOC | 3.665 | 0.788 | −0.027 | 0.063 | 0.087 | 0.481** | 0.475** | 0.551** | 0.463** | 0.537** | 1 | |||||||||||
| 10. LOCS | 3.343 | 0.875 | −0.013 | 0.032 | 0.036 | 0.562** | 0.564** | 0.604** | 0.546** | 0.632** | 0.545** | 1 | ||||||||||
| 11. TT | 3.447 | 0.826 | 0.002 | −0.018 | −0.007 | 0.582** | 0.542** | 0.637** | 0.572** | 0.634** | 0.561** | 0.672** | 1 | |||||||||
| 12. AE | 3.568 | 0.826 | −0.019 | −0.029 | −0.015 | 0.600** | 0.591** | 0.626** | 0.535** | 0.632** | 0.508** | 0.626** | 0.619** | 1 | ||||||||
| 13. HP | 4.107 | 1.344 | −0.013 | 0.018 | 0.021 | 0.323** | 0.305** | 0.323** | 0.348** | 0.383** | 0.323** | 0.342** | 0.330** | 0.362** | 1 | |||||||
| 14. AO | 4.257 | 1.324 | −0.061 | −0.013 | −0.02 | 0.325** | 0.284** | 0.285** | 0.277** | 0.335** | 0.244** | 0.298** | 0.273** | 0.362** | 0.583** | 1 | ||||||
| 15. VI | 3.176 | 1.391 | 0.016 | 0.032 | 0.022 | 0.303** | 0.222** | 0.264** | 0.286** | 0.337** | 0.284** | 0.315** | 0.312** | 0.270** | 0.305** | 0.283** | 1 | |||||
| 16. DE | 3.745 | 1.409 | −0.001 | 0.059 | 0.083 | 0.286** | 0.240** | 0.254** | 0.224** | 0.344** | 0.281** | 0.338** | 0.294** | 0.268** | 0.403** | 0.360** | 0.624** | 1 | ||||
| 17. AB | 3.331 | 1.321 | −0.023 | 0.037 | 0.023 | 0.257** | 0.220** | 0.245** | 0.241** | 0.298** | 0.277** | 0.309** | 0.295** | 0.279** | 0.311** | 0.287** | 0.586** | 0.568** | 1 | |||
| 18. WWB | 4.126 | 1.392 | −0.011 | −0.151** | −0.106* | 0.179** | 0.145** | 0.275** | 0.330** | 0.346** | 0.264** | 0.303** | 0.274** | 0.302** | 0.384** | 0.342** | 0.360** | 0.379** | 0.314** | 1 | ||
| 19. OWB | 4.195 | 1.428 | 0.042 | −0.206** | −0.134* | 0.316** | 0.364** | 0.144** | 0.219** | 0.337** | 0.280** | 0.318** | 0.301** | 0.352** | 0.350** | 0.332** | 0.349** | 0.360** | 0.314** | 0.478** | 1 | |
| 20. SIWB | 3.827 | 1.514 | 0.019 | −0.118* | −0.09 | 0.358** | 0.419** | 0.399** | 0.351** | 0.264** | 0.190** | 0.389** | 0.378** | 0.436** | 0.299** | 0.318** | 0.313** | 0.355** | 0.321** | 0.455** | 0.506** | 1 |
N = 343. **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05. Gender is the dummy variable (0 = female, 1 = male). CSB, challenge-skill balance; AAM, action-awareness merging; CG, cear goals; UFB, unambiguous feedback; COTTAH, concentration on the task at hand; SOC, sense of control; LOCS, loss of self-consciousness; TT, time transformation; AE, autotelic experience; HP, harmonious passion; AO, assessing obsessive; VI, vitality; DE, dedication; AB, absorbed; WWB, workload well-being; OWB, organizational well-being; SIWB, student interaction well-being.
Fit indices of the model.
| Fit indices | Recommended threshold | Scores | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML | – | 262.571 | – |
| Df | – | 155 | – |
| 1 < | 1.694 | Acceptable | |
| CFI | >0.9 | 0.963 | Acceptable |
| TLI | >0.9 | 0.955 | Acceptable |
| RMSEA | <0.08 | 0.045 | Acceptable |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.035 | Acceptable |
The direct effect of the research paths and research model hypothesis analysis.
| DV | IV | Std. est. | SE | Est./SE |
| Hypo and path | Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWB | FE | 0.248 | 0.070 | 3.551 | *** | 0.635 | H1: FE → TWB | Support |
| WP | 0.295 | 0.094 | 3.130 | 0.002 | H2b: WP → TWB | Support | ||
| WE | 0.366 | 0.077 | 4.752 | *** | H3b: WE → TWB | Support | ||
| WP | FE | 0.554 | 0.055 | 10.131 | *** | 0.308 | H2a: FE → WP | Support |
| WE | FE | 0.250 | 0.080 | 3.116 | 0.002 | 0.356 | H3a: FE → WE | Support |
| WP | 0.419 | 0.085 | 4.900 | *** | H4: WP → WE | Support |
***p < 0.001. FE, flow experiences; WP, work passion; WE, work engagement; TWB, teaching well-being.
The indirect effect of the research paths.
| Path | Std. est. | SE | Est./SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | The proportion of the effect (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2: FE → WP → TWB | 0.257 | 0.091 | 2.819 | 0.005 | 0.103 | 0.469 | 27.75 |
| H3: FE → WE → TWB | 0.144 | 0.061 | 2.366 | 0.018 | 0.051 | 0.300 | 15.55 |
| H5: FE → WP → WE → TWB | 0.134 | 0.042 | 3.193 | 0.001 | 0.072 | 0.247 | 14.47 |
| TOTALIND | 0.536 | 0.101 | 5.277 |
| 0.363 | 0.779 | 57.88 |
| TOTAL | 0.926 | 0.123 | 7.536 |
| 0.711 | 1.189 | 100.00 |
p < 0.001.
Figure 2Structural equation model.