Literature DB >> 36222850

Long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and a new approach for partial responders.

M Bosch-Ramírez1, L Sánchez-Guillén2, M J Alcaide-Quirós1, M M Aguilar-Martínez1, M Bellón-López1, A López Delgado1, F López-Rodríguez-Arias1, A Muñoz-Duyos3, X Barber-Valles1,4,5, A Arroyo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) refractory to conservative treatment. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of response and validate new treatment pathways for partial responders.
METHODS: A prospective, interventional study was carried out in a specialist defecatory disorder unit from a university hospital between January 2010 and June 2017 on patients > 18 years old with FI refractory to conservative treatment. Thirty-minute PTNS sessions were performed in three phases (weekly, biweekly and monthly) up to a year, with clinical reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 36 months. Patients were classified as optimal responders when their pretreatment Wexner score decreased > 50%; partial responders when it decreased 25-50%; and insufficient responders if it decreased < 25%. Only optimal and partial responders progressed into successive phases.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 139 patients (110 women, median age 63 years [range 22-82 years]) were recruited. After the first phase, 4 patients were optimal responders, 93 were partial responders and 36 were insufficient responders. At 6 and 12 months, 66 and 89 patients respectively were optimal responders, with an optimal response rate of 64% at the end of treatment. A total of 93.3% patients with a partial response initially finally became optimal responders. Furthermore, at 36 months, 71.9% of patients were still optimal responders without supplementary treatment, although their quality of life did not improve significantly. Baseline Wexner scores ≤ 10 and symptom duration < 1 year were identified as predictive factors for positive responses to PTNS.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing PTNS for 1 year following this protocol had optimal long-term responses. PTNS sessions for up to 1 year in patients who were partial responders prevents a high percentage of them from needing more invasive treatments, and maintains long-term continence in patients who were optimal responders.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Faecal incontinence; Long term efficacy; Neuromodulation; Partial response; Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36222850     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02711-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.699


  24 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The CONFIDeNT trial.

Authors:  Alexander Hotouras; Yolanda Ribas; Marion Allison; Jamie Murphy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Randomized clinical trial of sacral versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  N N Thin; S J C Taylor; S A Bremner; A V Emmanuel; N Hounsome; N S Williams; C H Knowles
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral neuromodulation: an update.

Authors:  Priyanka Gupta; Michael J Ehlert; Larry T Sirls; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Medium-term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Hidalgo-Pujol; V Andriola; L M Jimenez-Gomez; F Ostiz; E Espin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Anders Mellgren; Steven D Wexner; John A Coller; Ghislain Devroede; Darin R Lerew; Robert D Madoff; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexandra K Macmillan; Arend E H Merrie; Roger J Marshall; Bryan R Parry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation.

Authors:  M E D Jarrett; G Mowatt; C M A Glazener; C Fraser; R J Nicholls; A M Grant; M A Kamm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction.

Authors:  J F Johanson; J Lafferty
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of neuromodulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  N N Thin; E J Horrocks; A Hotouras; S Palit; M A Thaha; C L H Chan; K E Matzel; C H Knowles
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.