Literature DB >> 21825885

Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.

Anders Mellgren1, Steven D Wexner, John A Coller, Ghislain Devroede, Darin R Lerew, Robert D Madoff, Tracy Hull.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Sacral nerve stimulation is effective in the treatment of urinary incontinence and is currently under Food and Drug Administration review in the United States for fecal incontinence. Previous reports have focused primarily on short-term results of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. The present study reports the long-term effectiveness and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in a large prospective multicenter study. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinent episodes more than twice per week were offered participation in this multicentered prospective trial. Patients showing ≥ 50% improvement during test stimulation were offered chronic implantation of the InterStim Therapy system (Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN). The aims of the current report were to provide 3-year follow-up data on patients from that study who underwent sacral nerve stimulation and were monitored under the rigors of an Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational protocol.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients underwent test stimulation with a 90% success rate, of whom 120 (110 females) with a mean age of 60.5 years and a mean duration of fecal incontinence of 7 years received chronic implantation. Mean length of follow-up was 3.1 (range, 0.2-6.1) years, with 83 patients completing all or part of the 3-year follow-up assessment. At 3 years follow-up, 86% of patients (P < .0001) reported ≥ 50% reduction in the number of incontinent episodes per week compared with baseline and the number of incontinent episodes per week decreased from a mean of 9.4 at baseline to 1.7. Perfect continence was achieved in 40% of subjects. The therapy also improved the fecal incontinence severity index. Sacral nerve stimulation had a positive impact on the quality of life, as evidenced by significant improvements in all 4 scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life instrument at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up. The most common device- or therapy-related adverse events through the mean 36 months of follow-up included implant site pain (28%), paresthesia (15%), change in the sensation of stimulation (12%), and infection (10%). There were no reported unanticipated adverse device effects associated with sacral nerve stimulation therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacral nerve stimulation using InterStim Therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. These data support long-term safety and effectiveness to 36 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825885     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822155e9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  42 in total

1.  Extensive gluteal hematoma following InterStim implant: a case report.

Authors:  Balaji Kalyanaraman; Ayman Mahdy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: an effective surgical intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Olafur S Palsson; Corrado R Asteria; William E Whitehead
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  [Sacral nerve modulation in coloproctology].

Authors:  M Gelos; M Niedergethmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

Review 6.  Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Infection: Risk Factors and Prevention.

Authors:  Calvin Lee; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Marisa M Clifton; Sandip P Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Management of pelvic floor disorders: biofeedback and more.

Authors:  David Prichard; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12

8.  Translumbar and transsacral magnetic neurostimulation for the assessment of neuropathy in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Enrique Coss-Adame; Kasaya Tantiphlachiva; Ashok Attaluri; Jose Remes-Troche
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis.

Authors:  Urte Zurbuchen; Joern Groene; Susanne D Otto; Martin E Kreis; Stefanie Maerzheuser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients' satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients.

Authors:  Henri Damon; Xavier Barth; Sabine Roman; François Mion
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.