Literature DB >> 36216919

Breast Morphological Changes after Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation with Smooth Round Implants: A Prospective Study.

Yue Liu1, Jie Luan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most performed cosmetic surgery in the world. Although smooth round implants are widely used, the trend in breast morphology change after dual-plane augmentation with such implants remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed the issue with the support of 3D scanning technology, which may help provide an objective basis for the evaluation of postoperative outcomes and the determination of follow-up time points.
METHODS: Patients undergoing dual-plane augmentation with smooth round implants were prospectively included in this study. The variation trend of postoperative breast morphology was analyzed by measuring the specified linear distance, body surface distance, breast projection, nipple position and breast volume at different follow-up time points (1st month, post-1M; 3rd month, post-3M; 6th month, post-6M; 12th month, post-12M).
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. During the postoperative follow-up period, breast height prolonged while interval of the medial border gradually widened. Breast width was maintained without significant alterations from post-1M. The N-MBB lengthened with shortening of the N-LBB, meanwhile the N-IMF was prolonged by 0.6 cm. Breast volume was gradually reduced with the decrease in breast projection. The position of the nipple gradually shifted laterally, superiorly, and posteriorly after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between the linear distance at post-3M and post-12M, while the surface distance, breast projection, nipple position and breast volume tended to be stable at post-6M.
CONCLUSIONS: After dual-plane augmentation with smooth round implants, the base contour of the breast shifted outwards and downwards, and stabilized after 3 months. The remaining breast morphological parameters reached a relative steady state by post-6M, which could be regarded as the time point for objective evaluation of postoperative effect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast morphology; Dual-plane augmentation; Smooth round implants; Three-dimensional scanning

Year:  2022        PMID: 36216919     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03130-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  21 in total

1.  The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study.

Authors:  Chunjun Liu; Jie Luan; Lanhua Mu; Kai Ji
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation: core data update and review.

Authors:  Brian M Derby; Mark A Codner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.

Authors:  Laszlo Kovacs; Maximilian Eder; Regina Hollweck; Alexander Zimmermann; Markus Settles; Armin Schneider; Kristian Udosic; Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Edgar Biemer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  What Makes a Difference? Three-Dimensional Morphological Study of Parameters that Determine Breast Aesthetics.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Jingjing Sun; Dali Mu; Chunjun Liu; Jie Luan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Breast Implant Engineering and Performance.

Authors:  Khashayar Mohebali; Roger N Wixtrom
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method.

Authors:  Chunjun Liu; Jie Luan; Kai Ji; Jingjing Sun
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  A Prospective Study of Breast Morphological Changes and the Correlative Factors After Periareolar Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomic Implant.

Authors:  Fuchuan Lin; Weijin Hong; Li Zeng; Xiangxue Kong; Wenjie Feng; Shengkang Luo
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types.

Authors:  J B Tebbetts
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science.

Authors:  Manuel R Vegas; Jose L Martin del Yerro
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility.

Authors:  S Barr; E Hill; A Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.