Literature DB >> 23943051

Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science.

Manuel R Vegas1, Jose L Martin del Yerro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative tissue stretch deformities are among the possible complications in breast augmentation. These deformities are responsible for many potential risks such as bottoming-out deformity, breakdown of the inframammary fold, permanent tissue atrophy, sensory loss, and breast distortion (visible implant edges and traction rippling), among others. Although the elastic properties of the breast are a major concern for plastic surgeons, concepts such as stiffness, compliance, elasticity, and resilience have not been sufficiently defined or explored in the plastic surgery literature.
METHODS: Similar to any other material, living tissues are subject to the fundamentals of the mechanics of materials. Based on their experience with more than 5,000 breast augmentations, the authors explored the basic fundamentals of the mechanics of materials in search of a rational explanation for long-term results in breast augmentation and augmentation-mastopexy.
RESULTS: A basic law of the mechanics of materials determines that when a material (e.g., breast) is loaded with a force (e.g., implant), it produces a stress that causes the material to deform (e.g., breast augmentation), and this behavior might be graphed in a theoretical material's stress-stress curve. This deformation will increase with time although the load (implant) remains constant, a concept termed "creep deformation." Because the breast, like all human tissues, is a viscoelastic material, the application of concepts such as elastic and plastic deformation, stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation can and should be applied to breast augmentation surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have found that the principles of the mechanics of materials can provide plastic surgeons with some clues for a predictable, long-lasting good result in breast augmentation and augmentation-mastopexy. Future studies are needed to develop these concepts and evaluate how they might individually determine the mid- and long-term outcomes of augmented breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23943051     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-013-0197-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of soft tissue deformation using digital speckle pattern interferometry: studies on phantom breast models.

Authors:  Udayakumar Karuppanan; Sujatha Narayanan Unni; Ganesan R Angarai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  A prospective analysis of dynamic loss of breast projection in tissue expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Sumanas W Jordan; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

3.  Breast Morphological Changes after Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation with Smooth Round Implants: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Jie Luan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Breast Reconstruction- Developing a Volumetric Outcome Algorithm.

Authors:  Siling Yang; Marie-Luise Klietz; Tobias Hirsch; Philipp Wiebringhaus; Matthias M Aitzetmüller
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Optimizing Surgical Outcomes with Small-Volume Silicone Implants Associated with Autogenous Fat Grafting in Primary and Revision Breast Augmentation Surgery: Soft Weight Hybrid (SWEH) Concept.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Ary de Azevedo Marques Neto; João Maximiliano
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.

Authors:  Jerry E de Groot; Mireille J M Broeders; Cornelis A Grimbergen; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Reduced Pain and Accelerated Recovery Following Primary Breast Augmentation With Lightweight Breast Implants.

Authors:  Orel Govrin-Yehudain; Yossef Matanis; Jacky Govrin-Yehudain
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Capsular Weakness around Breast Implant: A Non-Recognized Complication.

Authors:  Pedro Salinero Arquero; Fabiana Cristina Zanata; Lydia Masako Ferreira; Fabio Xerfan Nahas
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07

Review 9.  Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty.

Authors:  Jacky Govrin-Yehudain; Haim Dvir; Dina Preise; Orel Govrin-Yehudain; Dael Govreen-Segal
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix in primary augmentation mammoplasty to minimize implant-related complications and achieve an internal mastopexy: a case series.

Authors:  Andrew Kornstein
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.