Literature DB >> 17122543

New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.

Laszlo Kovacs1, Maximilian Eder, Regina Hollweck, Alexander Zimmermann, Markus Settles, Armin Schneider, Kristian Udosic, Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer, Nikolaos A Papadopulos, Edgar Biemer.   

Abstract

Precise and objective calculation of breast volume is helpful to evaluate the aesthetic result of breast surgery, but traditional methods are unsatisfactory. Three-dimensional (3D) scanning of the body surface allows reproducible and objective assessment of the complex breast region but requires further investigation before clinical application. The main goal of this study was to investigate the precision and accuracy of breast volume measurement using 3D body scanning. Five independent observers standardized the 3D scanning method using 2 dummy models (n = 200) and examined its applicability with 6 test subjects and 10 clinical patients (n = 2220). Breast volume measurements obtained with the 3D-scanner technology were compared with reference measurements obtained from test subjects through nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. The mean deviation of the breast volume measurements of 1 test subject by all observers, expressed as percentage of volume, was 2.86 +/- 0.98, significantly higher than the deviation for the dummy models, 1.65 +/- 0.42 (P < 0.001). With respect to all clinical patients, the mean measurement precision obtained preoperatively was less precise than that obtained postoperatively (3.31 +/- 1.02 versus 1.66 +/- 0.49, respectively). Interobserver differences in measurement precision were not statistically significant. The mean breast volumes obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (441.42 +/- 137.05 mL) and 3D scanning (452.51 +/- 141.88 mL) significantly correlated (r = 0.995, P < 0.001). Breast volume measurement with 3D surface imaging represents a sufficiently precise and accurate method to guarantee objective and exact recording.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122543     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000235455.21775.6a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  22 in total

1.  Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Penny Furness; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hora Soltani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Breast cancer risk from different mammography screening practices.

Authors:  Harmen Bijwaard; Alina Brenner; Fieke Dekkers; Teun van Dillen; Charles E Land; John D Boice
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Gestation-Specific Changes in the Anatomy and Physiology of Healthy Pregnant Women: An Extended Repository of Model Parameters for Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pregnancy.

Authors:  André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Evaluation of precision and accuracy assessment of different 3-D surface imaging systems for biomedical purposes.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Gernot Brockmann; Alexander Zimmermann; Moschos A Papadopoulos; Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer; Hans Florian Zeilhofer; Robert Sader; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Three-dimensional prediction of free-flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction by CT angiography imaging.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Stefan Raith; Jalil Jalali; Daniel Müller; Yves Harder; Martin Dobritz; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Hans-Günther Machens; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Contribution of breast density to the volume of the augmented breast: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Sean M Hill; Franziska Huettner; John Murray; Eric Elwood; Rebecca Barrick; Glyn Jones
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  A prospective analysis of dynamic loss of breast projection in tissue expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Sumanas W Jordan; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

9.  Breast Morphological Changes after Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation with Smooth Round Implants: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Jie Luan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases.

Authors:  Ragip Kayar; Serdar Civelek; Murat Cobanoglu; Osman Gungor; Hidayet Catal; Mustafa Emiroglu
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2011-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.