Literature DB >> 36213613

Developing Indicators of Nutrient Pollution in Streams Using 16S rRNA Gene Metabarcoding of Periphyton-Associated Bacteria.

Erik M Pilgrim1, Nathan J Smucker1, Huiyun Wu2, John Martinson1, Christopher T Nietch1, Marirosa Molina3, John A Darling3, Brent R Johnson1.   

Abstract

Indicators based on nutrient-biota relationships in streams can inform water quality restoration and protection programs. Bacterial assemblages could be particularly useful indicators of nutrient effects because they are species-rich, important contributors to ecosystem processes in streams, and responsive to rapidly changing conditions. Here, we sampled 25 streams weekly (12-14 times each) and used 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding of periphyton-associated bacteria to quantify the effects of total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN). Threshold indicator taxa analysis identified assemblage-level changes and amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) that increased or decreased with increasing TP and TN concentrations (i.e., low P, high P, low N, and high N ASVs). Boosted regression trees confirmed that relative abundances of gene sequence reads for these four indicator groups were associated with nutrient concentrations. Gradient forest analysis complemented these results by using multiple predictors and random forest models for each ASV to identify portions of TP and TN gradients at which the greatest changes in assemblage structure occurred. Synthesized statistical results showed bacterial assemblage structure began changing at 24 μg TP/L with the greatest changes occurring from 110 to 195 μg/L. Changes in the bacterial assemblages associated with TN gradually occurred from 275 to 855 μg/L. Taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses showed that low nutrient ASVs were commonly Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobiota, Flavobacteriales, and Caulobacterales, Pseudomonadales, and Rhodobacterales of Proteobacteria, whereas other groups, such as Chitinophagales of Bacteroidota, and Burkholderiales, Rhizobiales, Sphingomonadales, and Steroidobacterales of Proteobacteria comprised the high nutrient ASVs. Overall, the responses of bacterial ASV indicators in this study highlight the utility of metabarcoding periphyton-associated bacteria for quantifying biotic responses to nutrient inputs in streams.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S; TITAN; agriculture; bioassessment; biomonitoring; boosted regression trees; gradient forest; nitrogen; periphyton; phosphorus; threshold indicator taxa analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36213613      PMCID: PMC9534034          DOI: 10.3390/w14152361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4441            Impact factor:   3.530


  55 in total

1.  A step towards the validation of bacteria biotic indices using DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring.

Authors:  Eva Aylagas; Javier Atalah; Pablo Sánchez-Jerez; John Pearman; Nuria Casado; Jorge Asensi; Kilian Toledo-Guedes; Susana Carvalho
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  Factors shaping community patterns of protists and bacteria on a European scale.

Authors:  Christina Bock; Manfred Jensen; Dominik Forster; Sabina Marks; Julia Nuy; Roland Psenner; Daniela Beisser; Jens Boenigk
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Fine sediment and flow velocity impact bacterial community and functional profile more than nutrient enrichment.

Authors:  Noël P D Juvigny-Khenafou; Jeremy J Piggott; David Atkinson; Yixin Zhang; Naicheng Wu; Christoph D Matthaei
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding of benthic bacterial communities indicates the benthic footprint of salmon aquaculture.

Authors:  Thorsten Stoeck; Larissa Frühe; Dominik Forster; Tristan Cordier; Catarina I M Martins; Jan Pawlowski
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  A cross-taxa study using environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding to measure biological impacts of offshore oil and gas drilling and production operations.

Authors:  Olivier Laroche; Susanna A Wood; Louis A Tremblay; Joanne I Ellis; Gavin Lear; Xavier Pochon
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  Biodiversity, community structure and function of biofilms in stream ecosystems.

Authors:  Katharina Besemer
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  Potential for DNA-based identification of Great Lakes fauna: match and mismatch between taxa inventories and DNA barcode libraries.

Authors:  Anett S Trebitz; Joel C Hoffman; George W Grant; Tyler M Billehus; Erik M Pilgrim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Is DNA barcoding actually cheaper and faster than traditional morphological methods: results from a survey of freshwater bioassessment efforts in the United States?

Authors:  Eric D Stein; Maria C Martinez; Sara Stiles; Peter E Miller; Evgeny V Zakharov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluating ethanol-based sample preservation to facilitate use of DNA barcoding in routine freshwater biomonitoring programs using benthic macroinvertebrates.

Authors:  Eric D Stein; Bryan P White; Raphael D Mazor; Peter E Miller; Erik M Pilgrim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.