Literature DB >> 29475645

Environmental DNA metabarcoding of benthic bacterial communities indicates the benthic footprint of salmon aquaculture.

Thorsten Stoeck1, Larissa Frühe2, Dominik Forster2, Tristan Cordier3, Catarina I M Martins4, Jan Pawlowski5.   

Abstract

We evaluated benthic bacterial communities as bioindicators in environmental impact assessments of salmon aquaculture, a rapidly growing sector of seafood industry. Sediment samples (n=72) were collected from below salmon cages towards distant reference sites. Bacterial community profiles inferred from DNA metabarcodes were compared to reference data from standard macrofauna biomonitoring surveys of the same samples. Deltaproteobacteria were predominant in immediate vicinity of the salmon cages. Along the transect, significant shifts in bacterial community structures were observed with Gammaproteobacteria dominating the less-impacted sites. Alpha- and beta-diversity measures of bacterial communities correlated significantly with macrofauna diversity metrics and with five ecological status indices. Benthic bacterial communities mirror the reaction of macrofauna bioindicators to environmental disturbances caused by salmon farming. The implementation of bacterial eDNA metabarcoding in future Strategic Framework Directives is an alternative cost-effective high-throughput biomonitoring solution, providing a basis for management strategies in a matter of days rather than months.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bacterial communities; Environmental monitoring; Salmon aquaculture; eDNA metabarcoding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29475645     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  4 in total

1.  Developing Indicators of Nutrient Pollution in Streams Using 16S rRNA Gene Metabarcoding of Periphyton-Associated Bacteria.

Authors:  Erik M Pilgrim; Nathan J Smucker; Huiyun Wu; John Martinson; Christopher T Nietch; Marirosa Molina; John A Darling; Brent R Johnson
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.530

2.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals comparable responses to agricultural stressors on different trophic levels of a freshwater community.

Authors:  Kevin K Beentjes; S Henrik Barmentlo; Ellen Cieraad; Menno Schilthuizen; Berry B van der Hoorn; Arjen G C L Speksnijder; Krijn B Trimbos
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.622

3.  Fine-scale differences in eukaryotic communities inside and outside salmon aquaculture cages revealed by eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Marta Turon; Magnus Nygaard; Gledis Guri; Owen S Wangensteen; Kim Præbel
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Comparing sediment DNA extraction methods for assessing organic enrichment associated with marine aquaculture.

Authors:  John K Pearman; Nigel B Keeley; Susanna A Wood; Olivier Laroche; Anastasija Zaiko; Georgia Thomson-Laing; Laura Biessy; Javier Atalah; Xavier Pochon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.