Literature DB >> 36211475

Separation methods in single-cell proteomics: RPLC or CE?

Kellye A Cupp-Sutton1, Mulin Fang1, Si Wu1.   

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity is commonly investigated using single-cell genomics and transcriptomics to investigate biological questions such as disease mechanism, therapeutic screening, and genomic and transcriptomic diversity between cellular populations and subpopulations at the cellular level. Single-cell mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics enables the high-throughput examination of protein expression at the single-cell level with wide applicability, and with spatial and temporal resolution, applicable to the study of cellular development, disease, effect of treatment, etc. The study of single-cell proteomics has lagged behind genomics and transcriptomics largely because proteins from single-cell samples cannot be amplified as DNA and RNA can using well established techniques such as PCR. Therefore, analytical methods must be robust, reproducible, and sensitive enough to detect the very small amount of protein within a single cell. To this end, nearly every step of the proteomics process has been extensively altered and improved to facilitate the proteomics analysis of single cells including cell counting and sorting, lysis, protein digestion, sample cleanup, separation, MS data acquisition, and data analysis. Here, we have reviewed recent advances in single-cell protein separation using nano reversed phase liquid chromatography (nRPLC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) to inform application driven selection of separation techniques in the laboratory setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Single-cell proteomics; capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry; reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Year:  2022        PMID: 36211475      PMCID: PMC9542495          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2022.116920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1387-3806            Impact factor:   1.934


  83 in total

1.  High-efficiency nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled on-line with mass spectrometry using nanoelectrospray ionization for proteomics.

Authors:  Yufeng Shen; Rui Zhao; Scott J Berger; Gordon A Anderson; Nestor Rodriguez; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Nanoliter chemistry combined with mass spectrometry for peptide mapping of proteins from single mammalian cell lysates.

Authors:  R M Whittal; B O Keller; L Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Spray-Capillary-Based Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry for Metabolite Analysis in Single Cells.

Authors:  Lushuang Huang; Mulin Fang; Kellye A Cupp-Sutton; Zhe Wang; Kenneth Smith; Si Wu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Step-Wise Assessment and Optimization of Sample Handling Recovery Yield for Nanoproteomic Analysis of 1000 Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Ruilin Wu; Sansi Xing; Maryam Badv; Tohid F Didar; Yu Lu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  In Situ Microprobe Single-Cell Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry: Metabolic Reorganization in Single Differentiating Cells in the Live Vertebrate (Xenopus laevis) Embryo.

Authors:  Rosemary M Onjiko; Erika P Portero; Sally A Moody; Peter Nemes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Single Cell Proteomics Using Frog (Xenopus laevis) Blastomeres Isolated from Early Stage Embryos, Which Form a Geometric Progression in Protein Content.

Authors:  Liangliang Sun; Kyle M Dubiak; Elizabeth H Peuchen; Zhenbin Zhang; Guijie Zhu; Paul W Huber; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry for mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Kristian E Swearingen; Robert L Moritz
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.940

8.  Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Hansruedi Mathys; Jose Davila-Velderrain; Zhuyu Peng; Fan Gao; Shahin Mohammadi; Jennie Z Young; Madhvi Menon; Liang He; Fatema Abdurrob; Xueqiao Jiang; Anthony J Martorell; Richard M Ransohoff; Brian P Hafler; David A Bennett; Manolis Kellis; Li-Huei Tsai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Simple and Efficient Microsolid-Phase Extraction Tip-Based Sample Preparation Workflow to Enable Sensitive Proteomic Profiling of Limited Samples (200 to 10,000 Cells).

Authors:  James C Kostas; Michal Greguš; Jan Schejbal; Somak Ray; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Navin Rauniyar; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.