Literature DB >> 27314579

Single Cell Proteomics Using Frog (Xenopus laevis) Blastomeres Isolated from Early Stage Embryos, Which Form a Geometric Progression in Protein Content.

Liangliang Sun1, Kyle M Dubiak1, Elizabeth H Peuchen1, Zhenbin Zhang1, Guijie Zhu1, Paul W Huber1, Norman J Dovichi1.   

Abstract

Single cell analysis is required to understand cellular heterogeneity in biological systems. We propose that single cells (blastomeres) isolated from early stage invertebrate, amphibian, or fish embryos are ideal model systems for the development of technologies for single cell analysis. For these embryos, although cell cleavage is not exactly symmetric, the content per blastomere decreases roughly by half with each cell division, creating a geometric progression in cellular content. This progression forms a ladder of single-cell targets for the development of successively higher sensitivity instruments. In this manuscript, we performed bottom-up proteomics on single blastomeres isolated by microdissection from 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-, and 50-cell Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) embryos. Over 1 400 protein groups were identified in single-run reversed-phase liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry from single balstomeres isolated from a 16-cell embryo. When the mass of yolk-free proteins in single blastomeres decreased from ∼0.8 μg (16-cell embryo) to ∼0.2 μg (50-cell embryo), the number of protein group identifications declined from 1 466 to 644. Around 800 protein groups were quantified across four blastomeres isolated from a 16-cell embryo. By comparing the protein expression among different blastomeres, we observed that the blastomere-to-blastomere heterogeneity in 8-, 16-, 32-, and 50-cell embryos increases with development stage, presumably due to cellular differentiation. These results suggest that comprehensive quantitative proteomics on single blastomeres isolated from these early stage embryos can provide valuable insights into cellular differentiation and organ development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27314579      PMCID: PMC4940028          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  40 in total

1.  Enzyme patterns in single human muscle fibers.

Authors:  C V Lowry; J S Kimmey; S Felder; M M Chi; K K Kaiser; P N Passonneau; K A Kirk; O H Lowry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1978-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  In situ molecular analysis of plant tissues by live single-cell mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mónica Lorenzo Tejedor; Hajime Mizuno; Naohiro Tsuyama; Takanori Harada; Tsutomu Masujima
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Nanoliter chemistry combined with mass spectrometry for peptide mapping of proteins from single mammalian cell lysates.

Authors:  R M Whittal; B O Keller; L Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Ultrasensitive Proteome Profiling for 100 Living Cells by Direct Cell Injection, Online Digestion and Nano-LC-MS/MS Analysis.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Guoquan Yan; Mingxia Gao; Xiangmin Zhang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Coupling methanol denaturation, immobilized trypsin digestion, and accurate mass and time tagging for liquid-chromatography-based shotgun proteomics of low nanogram amounts of RAW 264.7 cell lysate.

Authors:  Liangliang Sun; Guijie Zhu; Yihan Li; Ping Yang; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo.

Authors:  S A Moody
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Metabolic differentiation of neuronal phenotypes by single-cell capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Peter Nemes; Ann M Knolhoff; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  From single cells to deep phenotypes in cancer.

Authors:  Sean C Bendall; Garry P Nolan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Quantitative proteomics of Xenopus laevis embryos: expression kinetics of nearly 4000 proteins during early development.

Authors:  Liangliang Sun; Michelle M Bertke; Matthew M Champion; Guijie Zhu; Paul W Huber; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Marco Y Hein; Christian A Luber; Igor Paron; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the Fundamental Structures of Life: Non-Targeted, Chemical Analysis of Single Cells and Subcellular Structures.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Neumann; Thanh D Do; Troy J Comi; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Automated Coupling of Nanodroplet Sample Preparation with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Single-Cell Proteomics.

Authors:  Sarah M Williams; Andrey V Liyu; Chia-Feng Tsai; Ronald J Moore; Daniel J Orton; William B Chrisler; Matthew J Gaffrey; Tao Liu; Richard D Smith; Ryan T Kelly; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Ying Zhu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Benchtop-compatible sample processing workflow for proteome profiling of < 100 mammalian cells.

Authors:  Kerui Xu; Yiran Liang; Paul D Piehowski; Maowei Dou; Kaitlynn C Schwarz; Rui Zhao; Ryan L Sontag; Ronald J Moore; Ying Zhu; Ryan T Kelly
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 4.  Transformative Opportunities for Single-Cell Proteomics.

Authors:  Harrison Specht; Nikolai Slavov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  New-generation mass spectrometry expands the toolbox of cell and developmental biology.

Authors:  Camille Lombard-Banek; Erika P Portero; Rosemary M Onjiko; Peter Nemes
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 6.  Nano-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and recent applications in omics investigations.

Authors:  Katherine L Sanders; James L Edwards
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 7.  Single-cell Proteomics: Progress and Prospects.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Single Cell Proteomics by Data-Independent Acquisition To Study Embryonic Asymmetry in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Anumita Saha-Shah; Melody Esmaeili; Simone Sidoli; Hyojeong Hwang; Jing Yang; Peter S Klein; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  In Situ Microprobe Single-Cell Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry: Metabolic Reorganization in Single Differentiating Cells in the Live Vertebrate (Xenopus laevis) Embryo.

Authors:  Rosemary M Onjiko; Erika P Portero; Sally A Moody; Peter Nemes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Deciphering Metabolic Heterogeneity by Single-Cell Analysis.

Authors:  Tom M J Evers; Mazène Hochane; Sander J Tans; Ron M A Heeren; Stefan Semrau; Peter Nemes; Alireza Mashaghi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.