Literature DB >> 36210958

Risk factors of instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with no history of shoulder surgery.

Margaret A Sinkler1, Joshua D Dolan1, Drew Henderson2, Michael J Steflik2, Frank D Lewis1, Stephen A Parada2, Lynn A Crosby3.   

Abstract

Introduction: As its indications expand, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) utilization continues to increase. Though relatively uncommon, instability following rTSA can be associated with significant morbidity and need for subsequent revision and treatment. This case control study aims to characterize factors leading to instability after rTSA, especially in those with no previous shoulder surgery.
Methods: 194 rTSAs performed within the study period with appropriate operative indications and follow-up were included. Risk factors used in analysis included age, gender, BMI, ASA class, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), glenosphere, tray, and liner size. Data was analyzed using a hierarchical binary logistical regression to create a predictive model for instability.
Results: Seven patients sustained a post-operative dislocation. Mean time to dislocation was 60.4 weeks. Five required open reduction with placement of either a larger humeral tray or polyethylene spacer. One required open reduction with osteophyte removal, and one was converted to a resection arthroplasty. Dislocators were more likely to have a larger BMI (p = 0.002), higher ASA classification (p = 0.09), and larger liner size (p = 0.01).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates a large series of patients successfully treated with rTSA. Dislocations were an uncommon complication, but were clearly associated with higher patient BMI, ASA classification, and increased liner size.
© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Comorbidity; Dislocation; Exactech equinoxe; Operative instability; Retrospective studies; Risk factors; Shoulder; Shoulder prosthesis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36210958      PMCID: PMC9535283          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  18 in total

1.  High body mass index is associated with increased risk of implant dislocation following primary total hip replacement: 2,106 patients followed for up to 8 years.

Authors:  Omid Sadr Azodi; Johanna Adami; David Lindström; Karl O Eriksson; Andreas Wladis; Rino Bellocco
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Impact of inferior glenoid tilt, humeral retroversion, bone grafting, and design parameters on muscle length and deltoid wrapping in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher P Roche; Phong Diep; Matthew Hamilton; Lynn A Crosby; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas W Wright; Joseph D Zuckerman; Howard D Routman
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)       Date:  2013

3.  Early dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Zain Rahman; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion.

Authors:  G Daniel G Langohr; Joshua W Giles; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Emilie V Cheung; Eric J Sarkissian; Alex Sox-Harris; Garet C Comer; Jason R Saleh; Robert Diaz; John G Costouros
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis.

Authors:  Jason C Clark; Joseph Ritchie; Frederick S Song; Michael J Kissenberth; Stefan J Tolan; Nathan D Hart; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Which Patients Dislocate?

Authors:  Eric M Padegimas; Benjamin M Zmistowski; Camilo Restrepo; Joseph A Abboud; Mark D Lazarus; Matthew L Ramsey; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec

8.  Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair.

Authors:  Richard J Friedman; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas W Wright; Joseph D Zuckerman; Christopher P Roche
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Morbid obesity may increase dislocation in total hip patients: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Matej Daniel; Douglas R Pedersen; Bhupinder Singh; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Role of Subscapularis Repair on Muscle Force Requirements with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew L Hansen; Aniruddh Nayak; Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan; Kellen Worhacz; Richard Stowell; Marc C Jacofsky; Christopher P Roche
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.