Literature DB >> 29934280

Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Emilie V Cheung1, Eric J Sarkissian2, Alex Sox-Harris2, Garet C Comer2, Jason R Saleh2, Robert Diaz2, John G Costouros2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated patients with and without a prosthetic dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) to identify risk factors for instability.
METHODS: Dislocation and nondislocation cohorts were established for analysis in 119 patients who had undergone RTSA at our institution between 2011 and 2014. Preoperative history and parameters pertaining to RTSA design were evaluated for correlation with instability. A logistic regression model was used to analyze independent predictors.
RESULTS: Eleven patients (9.2%) demonstrated instability in the early postoperative period. Dislocations occurred at an average of 8 weeks postoperatively (range, 3 days-5 months). The mean follow-up of all patients was 28 months (range, 6-106 months). Postoperative instability was associated with male gender, history of prior open shoulder surgery, and preoperative diagnoses of fracture sequelae, particularly proximal humeral or tuberosity nonunion. Absence of subscapularis repair was an independent predictor of instability. In addition, 5 of the 11 patients (45%) in the instability cohort sustained a second dislocation requiring another operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Redislocation after revision surgery for the initial dislocation was an unexpected and alarming finding. Treatment for the initial dislocation event by placement of a thicker polyethylene insert was inadequate in 45% of patients of our cohort and required another revision with a larger glenosphere and thicker humeral inserts. Initial instability after RTSA must be carefully managed, especially in the revision and post-traumatic setting. Exchange to a thicker polyethylene insert only carries a higher risk of recurrent instability.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; complication reverse shoulder; dislocation prosthesis; prosthetic dislocation; prosthetic instability; recurrent instability; revision shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29934280     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  Editorial: The Sacredness of Surgery.

Authors:  David Ring; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Friedrich; D Cucchi; S Walter; S Gravius; D C Wirtz; J Schmolders
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 4.  Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arjun K Reddy; Jake X Checketts; B Joshua Stephens; J Michael Anderson; Craig M Cooper; Tyler Hunt; Keith Fishbeck; Marshall Boose; Byron Detweiler; Brian Chalkin; Brent L Norris
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-06-13

5.  Risk factors of instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with no history of shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Margaret A Sinkler; Joshua D Dolan; Drew Henderson; Michael J Steflik; Frank D Lewis; Stephen A Parada; Lynn A Crosby
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-29

6.  Dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary medialized modular systems. Can we still consider it such a frequent complication?

Authors:  Carlos Garcia-Fernandez; Yaiza Lopiz; Camilla Arvinius; Virginia Ponz; Borja Alcobía-Diaz; Pablo Checa; Maria Galán-Olleros; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-30

7.  Subscapularis-sparing approaches in shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Lee; Huda Sardar; Nolan S Horner; Latifah Al Mana; Bruce S Miller; Moin Khan; Bashar Alolabi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-26

8.  The rate of 2nd revision for shoulder arthroplasty as analyzed by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR).

Authors:  David R J Gill; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Sophia Rainbird; Alesha Hatton
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Is subscapularis repair associated with better outcome compared to non-repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative trials.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Gerogiannis; Efstathios Chronopoulos; Maria-Kyriaki Kaseta; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2019-06-26

Review 10.  Clinical outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for failed prior shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Bois; Paige Knight; Khalifa Alhojailan; Kamal I Bohsali
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.