Literature DB >> 36210358

Video augmented mirror therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Hyunjin Kim1, Junghyun Kim2, Sungbae Jo1, Kyeongjin Lee3, Junesun Kim4,5,6, Changho Song7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of mirror therapy using a newly developed video augmented wearable reflection device on reach-to-grasp motor control and upper extremity motor function.
METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: mirror therapy using a video augmented wearable reflection device group (MTVADG), n = 12; traditional mirror therapy group (TMTG), n = 12; and control group (CG), n = 12. Participants in the MTVADG and TMTG received conventional rehabilitation in addition to mirror therapy. Motor control during the reach-to-grasp movement was assessed using kinematic analysis. Each participant's upper extremity motor function was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Manual Function Test, and Box and Block Test.
RESULTS: While both the MTVADG and TMTG showed significantly improved reach-to-grasp movement. The MTVADG showed greater efficiency in kinematic performance than the TMTG. Moreover, while both the MTVADG and TMTG showed improved upper extremity motor function, the MTVADG showed significantly greater improvement in proximal upper limb function compared to the TMTG.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that mirror therapy using a video augmented wearable reflection device is more efficient compared to traditional mirror therapy for patients with stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: KCT0003047.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinematics; Mirror therapy; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity

Year:  2022        PMID: 36210358     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11410-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   6.682


  63 in total

1.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study.

Authors:  J G Broeks; G J Lankhorst; K Rumping; A J Prevo
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror.

Authors:  E L Altschuler; S B Wisdom; L Stone; C Foster; D Galasko; D M Llewellyn; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  J Whitall; S McCombe Waller; K H Silver; R F Macko
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar; Stephen Reethajanetsureka; Paul Pauljebaraj; Bright Benshamir; Sanjeev Manasseh Padankatti; Judy Ann David
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke.

Authors:  Debraj Mukherjee; Chirag G Patil
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  The mirror therapy program enhances upper-limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients.

Authors:  Myung Mo Lee; Hwi-Young Cho; Chang Ho Song
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 7.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gunes Yavuzer; Ruud Selles; Nebahat Sezer; Serap Sütbeyaz; Johannes B Bussmann; Füsun Köseoğlu; Mesut B Atay; Henk J Stam
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Neural interface of mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Ashu Bhasin; M V Padma Srivastava; Senthil S Kumaran; Rohit Bhatia; Sujata Mohanty
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.