Literature DB >> 7741608

Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

H S Jørgensen1, H Nakayama, H O Raaschou, J Vive-Larsen, M Støier, T S Olsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of stroke stratified according to both initial stroke severity and initial level of disability.
DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive, and community based.
SETTING: A stroke unit of a hospital in Denmark. This setting receives all acute stroke patients admitted from a well-defined catchment area of 239,886 inhabitants within the City of Copenhagen. Acute treatment as well as all stages of rehabilitation are cared for within the stroke unit regardless of age, stroke severity, and premorbid condition. PATIENTS: 1197 patients with acute stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was measured as death, discharge to nursing home, or to own home. Secondary outcome was measured as neurological deficits and functional disabilities after completed rehabilitation and again 6 months after stroke onset, using the Scandinavian Neurological Stroke Scale and the Barthel Index.
RESULTS: Stroke was initially very severe in 223 (19%) of the patients, severe in 171 (14%), moderate in 316 (26%), and mild in 487 (41%) patients. Two hundred and fifty (21%) patients died during hospital stay, 177 (15%) were discharged to nursing home, and 770 (64%) patients were discharged to their own home. After completed rehabilitation, 11% of survivors still had severe or very severe neurological deficits, 11% had moderate deficits, and 78% had no or only mild deficits; 20% were severely or very severely disabled, 8% were moderately disabled, 26% were mildly disabled, and 46% had no disability in activities of daily living. Detailed information on outcome stratified according to initial stroke severity/disability also is presented.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a thorough description of the needs for stroke rehabilitation in the community and the amount of postrehabilitation disability in stroke survivors. For outcome prediction, the results can be used as a reliable tool for prognostication of the chances (or risks) of various outcomes in patients characterized by initial degree of stroke severity and/or functional disability using simple, reliable scores in the acute phase of stroke. However, the results should not be used as a guideline for selecting patients for rehabilitation in the acute phase because even the most severe cases regularly experience meaningful improvement during rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7741608     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80567-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  83 in total

1.  A Rehabilitation First-Tournament Between Teams of Nursing Home Residents with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Gregory House; Grigore Burdea; Kevin Polistico; Namrata Grampurohit; Doru Roll; Frank Damiani; Samantha Keeler; Jasdeep Hundal
Journal:  Games Health J       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 2.  The Specific Requirements of Neural Repair Trials for Stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hermano Igo Krebs; Bruce T Volpe; Dustin Williams; James Celestino; Steven K Charles; Daniel Lynch; Neville Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits?

Authors:  Sandy McCombe Waller; Jill Whitall
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.138

5.  The Development of a New Computer Adaptive Test to Evaluate Anxiety in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Caregiver-Specific Anxiety.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Michael A Kallen; Angelle M Sander; Tracey A Brickell; Rael T Lange; Louis M French; Phillip A Ianni; Jennifer A Miner; Robin Hanks
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Clinical Predictors of Engagement in Inpatient Rehabilitation Among Stroke Survivors With Cognitive Deficits: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Emily A Kringle; Lauren Terhorst; Meryl A Butters; Elizabeth R Skidmore
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  The Development of a New Computer Adaptive Test to Evaluate Feelings of Being Trapped in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Feeling Trapped Item Bank.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Michael A Kallen; Robin Hanks; Anna L Kratz; Elizabeth A Hahn; Tracey A Brickell; Rael T Lange; Louis M French; Phillip A Ianni; Jennifer A Miner; Angelle M Sander
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Johanna V G Robertson; Thomas Hoellinger; Påvel Lindberg; Djamel Bensmail; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Transynaptic changes evident in peripheral axonal function after acute cerebellar infarct.

Authors:  William Huynh; Cindy S-Y Lin; Arun V Krishnan; Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Modulation of reactive response to slip-like perturbations: effect of explicit cues on paretic versus non-paretic side stepping and fall-risk.

Authors:  Prakruti Patel; Tanvi Bhatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.