Literature DB >> 3619994

Proportional weight gain and complications of pregnancy, labor, and delivery in healthy women of normal prepregnant stature.

M J Shepard, K G Hellenbrand, M B Bracken.   

Abstract

Detailed reproductive information was obtained through interview at early prenatal visits to hospital clinics, private medical groups, or health maintenance organizations for 4186 women delivered at Yale-New Haven Hospital. From these women, 1,396 were selected who had no preexisting chronic disease, were within their normal prepregnant weight for height as determined by Quetelet's Index (weight2/height2), and were delivered of single infants with no major congenital malformations between 37 and 42 weeks. These women were divided into four quartiles according to their proportional weight gain (weight gain/prepregnant weight): quartile 1 = gains less than or equal to 15%; quartile 2 = gains 16% to 25%; quartile 3 = gains 26% to 35%; quartile 4 = gains greater than 35%. Complications of pregnancy, labor, and delivery were recorded within 2 days of delivery. Compared with the women in quartile 2 those in quartile 4 were 3.8 times more likely to develop gestational hypertension and had a fourfold risk of becoming preeclamptic. They were also significantly more likely to require cesarean section. The size of the infant was a significant risk factor for prolonged second stage of labor in primigravid women (greater than 2 hours) but not in multigravid women (greater than 1 hour). Weight gains of more than 35% almost doubled the risk of a prolonged second stage of labor for multigravid women. High proportional gains were not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Clinicians should consider proportional weight gain when advising healthy women about weight gain during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3619994     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90323-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Routine weighing during antenatal visits.

Authors:  D L Dimperio; B H Frentzen; A C Cruz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22

2.  A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term.

Authors:  W Siggelkow; M Schmidt; C Skala; D Boehm; S von Forstner; H Koelbl; A Tresch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Report of a special panel on desired prenatal weight gains for underweight and normal weight women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  How should gestational weight gain be assessed? A comparison of existing methods and a novel method, area under the weight gain curve.

Authors:  Ken P Kleinman; Emily Oken; Jenny S Radesky; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Karen E Peterson; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Maternal anthropometric factors and risk of primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  M J Shepard; A F Saftlas; L Leo-Summers; M B Bracken
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Opportunities for primary and secondary prevention of excess gestational weight gain: General Practitioners' perspectives.

Authors:  Paige van der Pligt; Karen Campbell; Jane Willcox; Jane Opie; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation by Ultrasonographic Evaluation in a Northeastern Region of India.

Authors:  Ranjumoni Konwar; Bharati Basumatary; Malamoni Dutta; Putul Mahanta
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2021-12-20

8.  Body mass index, gestational weight gain, and obstetric complications in Moroccan population.

Authors:  Latifa Mochhoury; Rachid Razine; Jalal Kasouati; Mariam Kabiri; Amina Barkat
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2013-07-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.