| Literature DB >> 36199292 |
Farzaneh Ketabchi1, Sina Jamzad1.
Abstract
Two and a half years after COVID-19 was first reported in China, thousands of people are still dying from the disease every day around the world. The condition is forcing physicians to adopt new treatment strategies while emphasizing continuation of vaccination programs. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the development and progression of COVID-19 patients. Nonetheless, administration of recombinant angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 has been proposed for the treatment of the disease. The catalytic activity of cellular ACE2 (cACE2) and soluble ACE2 (sACE2) prevents angiotensin II and Des-Arg-bradykinin from accumulating in the body. On the other hand, SARS-CoV-2 mainly enters cells via cACE2. Thus, inhibition of ACE2 can prevent viral entry and reduce viral replication in host cells. The benefits of bradykinin inhibitors (BKs) have been reported in some COVID-19 clinical trials. Furthermore, the effects of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors on ACE2 cleavage and prevention of viral entry into host cells have been reported in COVID-19 patients. However, the administration of COX inhibitors can reduce innate immune responses and have the opposite effect. A few studies suggest benefits of low-dose radiation therapy (LDR) in treating acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19 patients. Nonetheless, radiation therapy can stimulate inflammatory pathways, resulting in adverse effects on lung injury in these patients. Overall, progress is being made in treating COVID-19 patients, but questions remain about which drugs will work and when. This review summarizes studies on the effects of a recombinant ACE2, BK and COX inhibitor, and LDR in patients with COVID-19.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36199292 PMCID: PMC9529525 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8698825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Respir J ISSN: 1198-2241 Impact factor: 2.130
Figure 1The imbalance in two arms of the renin-angiotensin system in COVID-19 infection: the classical arm vs. the protective arm.
Figure 2The relationship between sACE2, BK, and COX inhibitor, and plasma therapy in the patients with COVID-19. CVR: cardiovascular.
The effect of recombinant ACE2 in SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro.
| Study/subject | Drugs or exposure | Time of treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular vesicles (EVs) exposing cACE2 | 1) SARS-CoV-2 | First phase :1.5 h second phase: after 24 h | (i) Effective in vesicular viral trapping |
| 2) TMPRSS2 | (ii) More efficient: cACE2 with TMPRSS2 [ | ||
|
| |||
| Vero cells (monkey), human blood vessels, and kidney organoids | 1) Clinical grade of hrsACE | 1 hour followed by washing, | Block the cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 [ |
|
| |||
| Vero E6 cells (monkey) and kidney organoids | 1) hrsACE2 APN01 (50–800 | Kidney organoid: after 3 days | Block the cell entry and replication of SARS-CoV-2 [ |
| 2) Remdesivir (4–80 | |||
|
| |||
| Renal cell line of HK2 (human) and Vero E6 cells (monkey) | 1) Different concentrations of rACE2 | 3 days treatment | High concentration: inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry |
| Physiologic concentration: increased viral cell entry [ | |||
Drug administration in patients with COVID-19.
| Study/Subject | Drugs and doses | Time ( | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| BK inhibition | |||
|
| |||
| Man and woman (case-control) | 1) 3 doses of 30 mg of icatibant (B receptor blocker of BK) by sc injection at 6-hour intervals | (i) T: at the onset of admission to hospital | A significant reduction in oxygen supplementation [ |
| 2) Standard medications | (ii) D: 18 h (3 times each 6 hours) | ||
|
| |||
| Man and woman (randomized trial protocol) | 1) Icatibant 30 mg subcutaneously, 3 doses | (i) T: ≤12 days since the onset of the symptoms | Reducing the complications caused by COVID-19 pneumonia and duration of hospitalization [ |
| 2) The inhibitor of C1e/kallikrein 20 U/kg, i.v on day 1 and 4 | (ii) D: 4 days | ||
| 3) Standard medications | |||
|
| |||
| COX inhibition | |||
| Man and woman (prospective cohort study) | 1) Different NSAIDs | (i) T: acute: day1 chronic: before COVID-19 | Mortality and hospital admission did not differ in acute and chronic treatments [ |
| 2) Standard medications | |||
|
| |||
| Man and woman (prospective cohort study) | 1) Different NSAIDs | (i) T: different | It was not associated with higher mortality or increased severity of disease [ |
| 2) Standard medications | |||
|
| |||
| Man and woman (retrospective cohort study) | 1) Different NSAIDs | T: different | (i) Effective in mild disease |
| 2) Standard medications | D: different | ||
|
| |||
| ACE2 | |||
| 45-year-old woman (case report) | 1) Soluble recombinant ACE2 (APN01), 0·4 mg/kg) | (i) T: 9 days after the onset of symptoms | ACE2 was well tolerated with no obvious side effects [ |
| 2) Hydroxychloroquine, FIO2 of 70%, intubation, mechanical ventilation, cefuroxime, aztreonam | (ii) D: 5 minutes infusion twice a day lasting for 7 days | ||
|
| |||
| Low-dose radiation | |||
| Man and woman (clinical trial) | 1) Whole lung irradiation | Radiation in a single fraction of 0.5 Gy | Encouraging results for oxygen dependency in 3 of 5 patients [ |
|
| |||
| Man and woman (clinical trial) | 1) Whole lung irradiation | A single-fraction radiation dose of 1.5 Gy | No worsening of the cytokine storm was observed in 4 of the 5 patients [ |