Literature DB >> 36195776

Predictors of infraspinatus muscle degeneration in individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear.

Rebekah L Lawrence1,2, Balaji Veluswamy3, Elizabeth A Dobben3, Chad L Klochko3, Steven B Soliman4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the demographic and clinical factors that predict infraspinatus muscle degeneration in individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the medical records of patients who had a shoulder MRI interpreted by 1 of 3 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists since the implementation of a standardized MRI 3 T protocol within our healthcare system. Demographic (e.g., age, sex) and clinical data (e.g., tear size, muscle degeneration, co-morbidities) were collected. Patients with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear (n = 121) were assigned to one of two groups based on whether any infraspinatus muscle degeneration was present. Logistic regression was used to assess the univariate relationships between infraspinatus muscle degeneration and patient and clinical data, while least absolute shrinkage and selector operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to assess the multivariable relationship.
RESULTS: Of the patients with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear, 16.5% had evidence of infraspinatus muscle degeneration. The presence of infraspinatus muscle degeneration was independently associated with cardiovascular disease (P = 0.01), supraspinatus muscle degeneration (P < 0.01), and subscapularis muscle degeneration (P = 0.01). When the multivariable relationship is assessed, supraspinatus muscle degeneration emerged as the only variable of significant importance for detecting infraspinatus muscle degeneration (specificity: 87.1%, sensitivity: 80.0%).
CONCLUSION: Infraspinatus muscle degeneration is not uncommon in individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tear and is most associated with concomitant supraspinatus muscle degeneration. These findings highlight the need for clinicians to specifically assess the status of each rotator cuff muscle, even when the tendon itself is intact.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infraspinatus muscle degeneration; MRI shoulder; Rotator cuff repair; Rotator cuff retear; Supraspinatus tendon tear

Year:  2022        PMID: 36195776     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04201-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.128


  41 in total

1.  Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Anthony M Hollins; Hyun-Min Kim; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Karen Steger-May; Leesa M Galatz; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Early structural and functional outcomes for arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Bruno Toussaint; Erik Schnaser; Jacob Bosley; Yves Lefebvre; Reuben Gobezie
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Kluger; Peter Bock; Martina Mittlböck; Wolfgang Krampla; Alfred Engel
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: outcome and analysis of factors associated with healing failure or poor postoperative function.

Authors:  Seok Won Chung; Joon Yub Kim; Min Hyung Kim; Sae Hoon Kim; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Anteroposterior tear size, age, hospital, and case number are important predictors of repair integrity: an analysis of 1962 consecutive arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Julian K H Duong; Patrick H Lam; George A C Murrell
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Rotator Cuff Retears.

Authors:  Luciano Andrés Rossi; Jorge Chahla; Nikhil N Verma; Peter J Millett; Maximiliano Ranalletta
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2020-01

7.  Prognostic Factors Affecting Rotator Cuff Healing After Arthroscopic Repair in Small to Medium-sized Tears.

Authors:  Ji Soon Park; Hyung Jun Park; Sae Hoon Kim; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Massive rotator cuff tears: functional outcome after debridement or arthroscopic partial repair.

Authors:  Alexander Berth; Wolfram Neumann; Friedemann Awiszus; Géza Pap
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03

9.  Intraoperative determinants of rotator cuff repair integrity: an analysis of 500 consecutive repairs.

Authors:  Xiao L Wu; Lisa Briggs; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The influence of intraoperative factors and postoperative rehabilitation compliance on the integrity of the rotator cuff after arthroscopic repair.

Authors:  Shahrulazua Ahmad; Mark Haber; Desmond J Bokor
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.