Literature DB >> 33160028

Anteroposterior tear size, age, hospital, and case number are important predictors of repair integrity: an analysis of 1962 consecutive arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repairs.

Julian K H Duong1, Patrick H Lam1, George A C Murrell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retear or nonhealing of a surgically repaired rotator cuff is common, but the determinants of retear are poorly understood. We aimed to determine the relationship between preoperative and intraoperative factors and retear rate following rotator cuff repair and to formulate a predictive model based on this relationship, including any interaction effects between tear size, patient age, and surgical experience in contributing to the retear rate.
METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from 1962 consecutive patients who underwent a primary arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair performed by the senior author from 2007 through 2018 and postoperatively returned for 6-month follow-up ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed anteroposterior tear length to be the most important independent predictor of retear (Wald statistic, 90; P < .001). Other independent predictors included case number (Wald statistic, 59; P < .001), patient age at surgery (Wald statistic, 30; P < .001), and type of hospital (public vs. private) (Wald statistic, 17; P < .001). The data indicated that following rotator cuff repair, there was a 4-fold increase in the retear rate as the anteroposterior tear size increased from 1 cm to 3 cm; a 8-fold decrease when comparing case number 1000 with case number 3000; a 2-fold increase as patient age increased from 50 years to 70 years; and a 3-fold increase when comparing surgery performed in a public hospital vs. a private hospital. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.84), indicating that our equation could predict 81% of retears.
CONCLUSIONS: Anteroposterior tear length was the most important independent predictor of retear or nonhealing. Other predictive factors included case number, patient age at surgery, and hospital type. The predictive effect of anteroposterior tear length, patient age, and case number in contributing to retear was additive. Our regression equation may be used to calculate patient rotator cuff retear risk at 6 months after repair.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rotator cuff; determinants; interaction effects; predictors; repair; retear

Year:  2020        PMID: 33160028     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  Racial disparities in outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A propensity score matched analysis using multiple national data sets.

Authors:  Andrea H Johnson; Abigail Parkison; Benjamin M Petre; Justin J Turcotte; Daniel E Redziniak
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-28

2.  Predictors of infraspinatus muscle degeneration in individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Balaji Veluswamy; Elizabeth A Dobben; Chad L Klochko; Steven B Soliman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  Presurgical tear characteristics and estimated shear modulus as predictors of repair integrity and shoulder function one year after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Matthew C Ruder; Rebekah L Lawrence; Steven B Soliman; Michael J Bey
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Tear Size and Stiffness Are Important Predictors of Retear: An Assessment of Factors Associated with Repair Integrity at 6 Months in 1,526 Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Allen A Guo; Daniel J Stitz; Patrick Lam; George A C Murrell
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-09-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.