Literature DB >> 361933

The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements.

G Oilo, K D Jørgensen.   

Abstract

Two series of brass cones and two series of dentine posts with varying surface roughness were produced. Maximum roughness value and arithmetical mean roughness were recorded for each cone. Brass crowns were cemented either with zinc phosphate cement (De Trey's zinc Cenment Improved) or with polycarboxylate cement (Durelon). A tensile stress was applied until the crown and the cone separated. The retentive force in relation to retention area was measured. The results showed that the retentive ability of both cements increased with increasing surface roughness. The increase in retention was greater for brass than for dentine. Differences were also found between the two cements; on smooth surfaces the zinc phosphate cement had a lower retentive ability than the polycarboxylate cement, but on rough surfaces the opposite relationship was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 361933     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  8 in total

1.  Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview.

Authors:  Komal Ladha; Mahesh Verma
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2010-12-12

2.  A tooth preparation technique in fixed prosthodontics for students and neophyte dentists.

Authors:  Daniele Rosella; Giancarlo Rosella; Edoardo Brauner; Piero Papi; Luca Piccoli; Giorgio Pompa
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-02-12

3.  [Influence of preparation height and cement space on the fit and retention of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing zirconia crown].

Authors:  Shuang Xi; Zi-Xiao Wu; Cui-Cui Gao; Yu-Chen Meng; Dan-Dan Pei; Yi Lu
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Comparative evaluation of bond strength of all-metal crowns with different luting agents after undergoing various modes of surface treatments: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Shivam Singh Tomar; Jayanta Bhattacharyya; Soumitra Ghosh; Preeti Goel; Samiran Das; Kaplia Chakarvarty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  Effect of Implant Abutment Acid Etching on the Retention of Crowns Luted with Different Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  R Ajay; V Rakshagan; M Kamatchi; A SelvaBalaji; Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar; M Senthil Kumar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

6.  Retention of Various Luting Agents Used with Implant-Supported Crowns.

Authors:  Santhosh Sathyanarayan; Tamizhesai Balavadivel; Rakshit C Guru; Abhijeet Rajendra Sande; Venkateswaran Rajendran; Arul Kumar Sengottaiyan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

7.  A comparison of retentive strength of implant cement depending on various methods of removing provisional cement from implant abutment.

Authors:  Eun-Cheol Keum; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  What is the changing frequency of diamond burs?

Authors:  Faruk Emir; Simel Ayyildiz; Cem Sahin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.