Literature DB >> 21629449

Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview.

Komal Ladha, Mahesh Verma.   

Abstract

Long-term clinical success of fixed prosthodontic restorations is influenced by many factors, one important factor being the selection of an appropriate luting agent. No single luting agent is capable of meeting all the stringent requirements, which is one reason why there is such a wide choice of luting agents currently available from conventional water-based to contemporary adhesive resin cements. Introduction of adhesive resin systems has completely changed the face of fixed prosthodontic practice leading to an increased use of bonded all-ceramic crowns and resin-retained fixed partial dentures. This article makes an effort to review various conventional and contemporary luting agents, their properties & associated clinical implications thereby trying to help the clinician select an appropriate luting agent for a given clinical situation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advantages; Chief concerns; Clinical recommendations; Luting cements; Properties; Shortcomings

Year:  2010        PMID: 21629449      PMCID: PMC3081255          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  58 in total

1.  The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.

Authors:  Glen H Johnson; Lance R Hazelton; David J Bales; Xavier Lepe
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements.

Authors:  D G Charlton; B K Moore; M L Swartz
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 3.  Development of glass-ionomer cement systems.

Authors:  D C Smith
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Early bonding of resin cements to dentin--effect of bonding environment.

Authors:  M F Burrow; T Nikaido; M Satoh; J Tagami
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 5.  Glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  J W McLean
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1988-05-07       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Luting cement-metal surface physicochemical interactions on film thickness.

Authors:  J M Strutz; S N White; Z Yu; C L Kane
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading.

Authors:  H Zeynep Ertugrul; Yahia H Ismail
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  W Kanchanavasita; H M Anstice; G J Pearson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  The properties of four dental cements.

Authors:  L Stevens
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.291

10.  Essential oil phenyl propanoids. Useful as .OH scavengers?

Authors:  J Taira; T Ikemoto; T Yoneya; A Hagi; A Murakami; K Makino
Journal:  Free Radic Res Commun       Date:  1992
View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparative study of the radiopacity of resin cements used in aesthetic dentistry.

Authors:  Raquel Montes-Fariza; Manuel Monterde-Hernández; Cristina Cabanillas-Casabella; Antonio Pallares-Sabater
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Color stability of adhesive resin cements after immersion in coffee.

Authors:  Maho Shiozawa; Hidekazu Takahashi; Yuya Asakawa; Naohiko Iwasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparative analysis of shear bond strength of lithium disilicate samples cemented using different resin cement systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Viram Upadhyaya; Aman Arora; Jagriti Singhal; Smriti Kapur; Monika Sehgal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

4.  Evaluation of microhardness and water sorption/solubility of dual-cure resin cement through monolithic zirconia in different shades.

Authors:  Elham Ansarifard; Zahra Panbehzan; Rashin Giti
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.

Authors:  Safoura Ghodsi; Mohammad Mostafa Aghamohseni; Sarah Arzani; Sasan Rasaeipour; Mina Shekarian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-07-18

6.  Comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with different temporary luting cements: In vitro study.

Authors:  Sheen Juneja Arora; Aman Arora; Viram Upadhyaya; Shilpi Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.