| Literature DB >> 36188150 |
Georgi Vasilev1, Plamena Kabakchieva2,3, Dimitrina Miteva4, Hristiana Batselova5, Tsvetelina Velikova6,7.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common comorbid conditions encountered in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection accompanied by significantly increased mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation. This review aims to present the effectiveness and safety profile of available coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in people with diabetes as a potential cause of hesitancy for vaccination. Data from published research proves a robust immune response following immunization for COVID-19 in diabetic patients with substantial production of virus-neutralizing antibodies; however, the observed immune response was unequivocally weaker than that in individuals without diabetes. This observation was further enhanced by the findings that worse glycemic control was associated with more suppressed antibody production. In contrast, individuals with optimal glycemic control performed similarly to healthy controls. In addition to the need for strict glucose monitoring and adequate diabetes treatment, those findings reinforce the concept of diabetes-induced secondary immune deficiency and necessitate the application of booster doses to diabetic patients with priority. Nevertheless, after vaccination, reported adverse events were not different from those in the general population. No increase in severe adverse events was documented. While single case reports detected transient increases in blood glucose post-vaccination, more extensive trials could not replicate such a relationship. ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccines; Diabetes; Vaccine; Vaccine effectiveness; Vaccine hesitancy
Year: 2022 PMID: 36188150 PMCID: PMC9521442 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i9.738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Diabetes ISSN: 1948-9358
Existing studies on effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in patients with diabetes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nomura | Observational study | BNT162b2 | 12 from a total of 252, at a mean age of 43.9 yr | Lower antibody titers compared to non-diabetic subjects 3 mo post-vaccination | N/A |
| Lustig | Longitudinal cohort study | BNT162b2 | 139 from a total of 2498, at a mean age of 47.7 yr; mostly healthcare workers | Substantial antibody response after 2 doses, but overall lower concentrations of IgG and IgA in diabetics compared to healthy adults | N/A |
| Van Praet | Case-control study | BNT162b2 | 25 from a total of 75, at a mean age of 85 yr | Decreased cellular immune response only in individuals with diabetes or active malignancy in the studied population | N/A |
| Ali | Cohort study | BNT162b2 | 81 | The BNT162b2 vaccine induced robust IgG and neutralizing antibody responses in people with and without T2DM. On average, diabetics had 13.86 BAU/mL less IgG and 4.42% less neutralizing antibodies compared to non-diabetics | N/A |
| Marfella | Prospective observational study | BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S | 251, of which 134 with optimal glycemic control and 117 with poor glycemic control | 21 d after the second dose, neutralizing antibody titers and CD4 Th1 cytokine responses were weaker in individuals with HbA1c > 7% compared to those with HbA1c < 7% whose titers were indistinguishable from those of healthy subjects | N/A |
| Singh | Cross-sectional study | ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield), BBV-152 (Covaxin) | 52 from a total of 463 at a mean age of 44.8 yr | Amongst all studied comorbidities, people with T2DM had lower seropositivity rates compared to those without (84.6% | N/A |
| Sauré | Surveillance study | CoronaVac, BNT162b2 | 4626 from a total of 59987 people from Chile’s population | IgG seropositivity was significantly lower in diabetics receiving the CoronaVac vaccine compared to healthy subjects | N/A |
| Piccini | Retrospective cohort study | mRNA-1273BNT162b2 | 39 | In adolescents and young adults with T1DM, vaccination with either product was safe and did not influence glycemic control | No serious adverse events were reported |
| Watanabe | Observational study | Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine | 2 from a total of 66 at a mean age of 29 yr; mostly healthcare workers | Undetectable titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies | N/A |
| Karamese and Tutuncu[ | Cross-sectional study | CoronaVac | 49 from a total of 186 people, at a mean age of 70.4 yr | Significantly lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in diabetes patients than in the controls | N/A |
SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; IgG: Immunoglobulin G; T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; N/A: Not applicable; BAU: Binding antibody units.
Figure 1Immunological alterations in diabetes patients.