Literature DB >> 36180769

Continuous cursor-captured conceptual competition: Investigating the spatiotemporal dynamics of spoken word comprehension.

Josef Toon1, Marie-Josee Bisson2, Mark Scase2, Anuenue Kukona2.   

Abstract

Semantically related concepts are coactivated during spoken word comprehension. Two internet-mediated cursor-tracking experiments examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of this coactivation. Participants viewed visual arrays containing images of a target (e.g., accordion) and a semantically related (e.g., banjo) or unrelated (e.g., plum) distractor whilst hearing the target word (e.g., "accordion"). Participants were tasked with moving their cursor from the bottom of the visual array to the target in one of the upper corners. In contrast to Experiment 1, the onset of stimulus presentation was triggered by cursor movement in Experiment 2. Across both experiments, temporal (e.g., RT) and spatial (e.g., AUC) measures revealed significantly greater attraction to images of semantically related compared with unrelated distractors. These results reveal that online cursor-tracking methods are sensitive to semantic competition and suitable for studying the activation of semantic knowledge during language comprehension.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory word recognition; Semantic memory; Semantic priming; Word recognition

Year:  2022        PMID: 36180769     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01358-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  Synthesized speech intelligibility among native speakers and non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  Diane Mayasari Alamsaputra; Kathryn J Kohnert; Benjamin Munson; Joe Reichle
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  LSAfun--An R package for computations based on Latent Semantic Analysis.

Authors:  Fritz Günther; Carolin Dudschig; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-11-26

Review 3.  Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Doing psychological science by hand.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-08-13

5.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-23

6.  MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

7.  Computer-mouse tracking reveals TMS disruptions of prefrontal function during semantic retrieval.

Authors:  Nicholas C Hindy; Roy Hamilton; Andrea S Houghtling; H Branch Coslett; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?

Authors:  Pascal J Kieslich; Martin Schoemann; Tobias Grage; Johanna Hepp; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

9.  Pushing forward in embodied cognition: may we mouse the mathematical mind?

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Matthias Hartmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-20

10.  Predicting Lexical Priming Effects from Distributional Semantic Similarities: A Replication with Extension.

Authors:  Fritz Günther; Carolin Dudschig; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.