Literature DB >> 36180602

Prevalence of Vertebral Fractures and Non-fracture Deformities in Healthy Adult Men: The Importance of Morphologic Criteria.

S De Smet1, T Banica1, H G Zmierczak1,2, S Goemaere1,2, C Verroken1,2, J M Kaufman1,2, B Lapauw3,4.   

Abstract

Vertebral fractures (VF) are common in older men but data on VF prevalence in young men is limited. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of VF and non-fracture vertebral deformities (VD) in healthy young to middle-aged men, and compare the characteristics of men with normal vertebrae, VF and VD. In this cross-sectional study, vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed in 650 men, aged 32 to 60 years (mean 46.2), from the population-based SIBLOS-SIBEX cohort. For VF and VD assessment, both the modified algorithm-based qualitative approach (morphologic criteria) to discriminate VF from VD and the semi-quantitative (morphometric) grading system of Genant (GSQ) were used. We found 48 (0.6%) fractured vertebrae, of which 15 were classified grade 1, 29 grade 2 and 4 grade 3 VF. There were 378 (4.7%) VD, of which 296 were scored grade 1, 82 grade 2 and none grade 3 VD. Twenty-six participants (4%) had VF, 15 had one and 11 had 2 or more VF. Two hundred and twenty-eight (35.1%) men had VD. Femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were lower in men with VF than in those with normal vertebrae or VD. Men with VD, in turn, had aBMD values similar to men with normal vertebrae. Our results suggest that -even in young healthy men-using the GSQ without taking qualitative aspects into account overestimates VF prevalence, confirming the importance of morphologic criteria to correctly diagnose and distinguish VF from VD.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prevalence; Vertebral fracture; Vertebral fracture assessment; Vertebral non-fracture deformity; Young to middle-aged men

Year:  2022        PMID: 36180602     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-022-01029-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.000


  32 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: Clinical applications of vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Andrew J Laster
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Prevalence Varies Widely Between Qualitative and Quantitative Radiological Assessment Methods: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Stephan J Breda; John T Schousboe; Emma M Clark; Joyce Bj van Meurs; M Arfan Ikram; Jan H Waarsing; Frank Ja van Rooij; Maria C Zillikens; Gabriel P Krestin; Edwin Hg Oei; Fernando Rivadeneira
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  What Proportion of Incident Radiographic Vertebral Fractures in Older Men Is Clinically Diagnosed and Vice Versa: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Terri L Blackwell; Howard A Fink; Jie Zhang; Jane A Cauley; Peggy M Cawthon; Dennis M Black; Douglas C Bauer; Jeffrey R Curtis; Eric S Orwoll; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Deborah M Kado; Lynn M Marshall; James M Shikany; John T Schousboe
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis.

Authors:  C M Klotzbuecher; P D Ross; P B Landsman; T A Abbott; M Berger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Comparative Analysis of the Radiology of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Women and Men: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Observations from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  Brian C Lentle; Claudie Berger; Linda Probyn; Jacques P Brown; Lisa Langsetmo; Ben Fine; Kevin Lian; Arvind K Shergill; Jacques Trollip; Stuart Jackson; William D Leslie; Jerilynn C Prior; Stephanie M Kaiser; David A Hanley; Jonathan D Adachi; Tanveer Towheed; K Shawn Davison; Angela M Cheung; David Goltzman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  The Radiology of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Revisited.

Authors:  Brian Lentle; Fjorda Koromani; Jacques P Brown; Ling Oei; Leanne Ward; David Goltzman; Fernando Rivadeneira; William D Leslie; Linda Probyn; Jerilynn Prior; Ian Hammond; Angela M Cheung; Edwin H Oei
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Jiang; R Eastell; N A Barrington; L Ferrar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; C De Laet; H Johansson; A Oden; P Delmas; J Eisman; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology.

Authors:  B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  C Cooper; T O'Neill; A Silman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.