Literature DB >> 28722766

Comparative Analysis of the Radiology of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Women and Men: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Observations from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Brian C Lentle1, Claudie Berger2, Linda Probyn3, Jacques P Brown4, Lisa Langsetmo5, Ben Fine6, Kevin Lian1, Arvind K Shergill7, Jacques Trollip8, Stuart Jackson9, William D Leslie10, Jerilynn C Prior8, Stephanie M Kaiser11, David A Hanley12, Jonathan D Adachi13, Tanveer Towheed14, K Shawn Davison15, Angela M Cheung16, David Goltzman17.   

Abstract

We compared two methods for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) assessment on lateral spine radiographs, the Genant semiquantitative (GSQ) technique and a modified algorithm-based qualitative (mABQ) approach. We evaluated 4465 women and 1771 men aged ≥50 years from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study with available X-ray images at baseline. Observer agreement was lowest for grade 1 VFs determined by GSQ. Among physician readers, agreement was greater for VFs diagnosed by mABQ (ranging from 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00-1.00] to 0.88 [0.76-1.00]) than by GSQ (ranging from 0.38 [0.17-0.60] to 0.69 [0.54-0.85]). GSQ VF prevalence (16.4% [95% CI 15.4-17.4]) and incidence (10.2/1000 person-years [9.2; 11.2]) were higher than with the mABQ method (prevalence 6.7% [6.1-7.4] and incidence 6.3/1000 person-years [5.5-7.1]). Women had more prevalent and incident VFs relative to men as defined by mABQ but not as defined by GSQ. Prevalent GSQ VFs were predominantly found in the mid-thoracic spine, whereas prevalent mABQ and incident VFs by both methods co-localized to the junction of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Prevalent mABQ VFs compared with GSQ VFs were more highly associated with reduced adjusted L1 to L4 bone mineral density (BMD) (-0.065 g/cm2 [-0.087 to -0.042]), femoral neck BMD (-0.051 g/cm2 [-0.065 to -0.036]), and total hip BMD (-0.059 g/cm2 [-0.076 to -0.041]). Prevalent mABQ VFs compared with prevalent GSQ were also more highly associated with incident VF by GSQ (odds ratio [OR] = 3.3 [2.2-5.0]), incident VF by mABQ (9.0 [5.3-15.3]), and incident non-vertebral major osteoporotic fractures (1.9 [1.2-3.0]). Grade 1 mABQ VFs, but not grade 1 GSQ VFs, were associated with incident non-vertebral major osteoporotic fractures (OR = 3.0 [1.4-6.5]). We conclude that defining VF by mABQ is preferred to the use of GSQ for clinical assessments.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRACTURE RISK; NON-VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; OSTEOPOROSIS; RADIOLOGY; VERTEBRAL FRACTURE PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28722766     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  23 in total

1.  Computed tomography shows high fracture prevalence among physically active forager-horticulturalists with high fertility.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Benjamin C Trumble; Caleb E Finch; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff; Hillard Kaplan; Michael D Gurven
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  The role of radiography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Daniel López Zúñiga
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Informed communication with study subjects of radiographically detected osteoporotic vertebral deformity.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Nazmi Che-Nordin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-09

4.  Prevalent vertebral fractures and minor vertebral deformities analyzed by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) increases the risk of incident fractures in postmenopausal women: the FRODOS study.

Authors:  E Kanterewicz; E Puigoriol; J R Rodríguez Cros; P Peris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  On the possibility of over-diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture at mid-thoracic level.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Xiao-Rong Wang; Nazmi Che-Nordin; Fei-Rong Xu; Qiu-Li Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Gender and the recognition of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Brian C Lentle
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-06

Review 7.  Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  John T Schousboe
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Productivity loss associated with functional disability in a contemporary small-scale subsistence population.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Paul L Hooper; Benjamin C Trumble; Hillard Kaplan; Michael D Gurven
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Elderly males with or without existing osteoporotic vertebral fracture have much lower future vertebral fracture risk than elderly females: the MrOS (Hong Kong) year-4 follow-up spine radiograph study.

Authors:  Y X J Wáng; N Che-Nordin; M Deng; J F Griffith; J C S Leung; A W L Kwok; P C Leung; T C Y Kwok
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures more likely involve the upper endplate than the lower endplate and even more so in males.

Authors:  Nazmi Che-Nordin; Min Deng; James F Griffith; Jason C S Leung; Anthony W L Kwok; Yue-Qi Zhu; Richard H Y So; Timothy C Y Kwok; Ping Chung Leung; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.