Literature DB >> 36178607

Data mining for adverse drug reaction signals of daptomycin based on real-world data: a disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

Jiao-Jiao Chen1, Xue-Chen Huo2, Shao-Xia Wang3, Fei Wang1, Quan Zhao4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on daptomycin's adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have been insufficient, often because of limited data. Pharmacovigilance risk signal detection is innovative and has been applied to the safety monitoring and reevaluation of drugs post-marketing. AIM: The study aimed to promote safe daptomycin prescribing by mining and evaluating the daptomycin ADR signals from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
METHOD: A disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratio ROR and proportional reporting ratio PRR) was utilized for FAERS data mining from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2021 (the most recent quarterly data at the time of the study). Preferred Terms of ADR reports were categorized by System Organ Class (SOC) based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.
RESULTS: This study retrieved 12,221 cases within the reporting period. A total of 140 repetitive signals were obtained by ROR and PRR, of which 53 new ADR signals were not recorded in the drug labels/datasheets. The top three ADR reports were "blood creatine phosphokinase elevation" (ROR, 56.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 51.07-62.87, PRR 51.94), "eosinophilic pneumonia" (ROR 696.71, 95%CI 603.21-804.70, PRR 657.57), and "rhabdomyolysis" (ROR 22.85, 95%CI 19.94-26.18, PRR 21.83). The highest ROR of "antimicrobial susceptibility test resistant" was found at 9808.14. Reports of rare adverse events, such as "necrotizing fasciitis and compartment syndrome," have emerged. The significant SOCs were "Infections and Infestations" and "Investigations."
CONCLUSION: New daptomycin ADR signals were detected. Clinicians should monitor these potential ADRs in patients receiving daptomycin.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug reactions; Daptomycin; FAERS; Real-world; Signal mining

Year:  2022        PMID: 36178607     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01472-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  41 in total

1.  Daptomycin.

Authors:  Peter Kirkpatrick; Aarti Raja; Jason LaBonte; John Lebbos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Daptomycin Versus Standard-of-care in Pediatric Patients With Staphylococcal Bacteremia.

Authors:  Antonio C Arrieta; John S Bradley; Myra W Popejoy; Mekki Bensaci; Anjana Grandhi; Paula Bokesch; Chad Glasser; Lihong Du; Hernando Patino; Nicholas A Kartsonis
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Daptomycin activity tested against 164457 bacterial isolates from hospitalised patients: summary of 8 years of a Worldwide Surveillance Programme (2005-2012).

Authors:  Helio S Sader; David J Farrell; Robert K Flamm; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Case report and cohort analysis of drug-induced liver injury associated with daptomycin.

Authors:  Nicole Bohm; Charles Makowski; Mario Machado; Adam Davie; Nelson Seabrook; Lee Wheless; Benjamin Bevill; Bradley Clark; T Rogers Kyle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Vance G Fowler; Helen W Boucher; G Ralph Corey; Elias Abrutyn; Adolf W Karchmer; Mark E Rupp; Donald P Levine; Henry F Chambers; Francis P Tally; Gloria A Vigliani; Christopher H Cabell; Arthur Stanley Link; Ignace DeMeyer; Scott G Filler; Marcus Zervos; Paul Cook; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Jack M Bernstein; Connie Savor Price; Graeme N Forrest; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Marcelo Gareca; Susan J Rehm; Hans Reinhardt Brodt; Alan Tice; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Daptomycin-induced acute renal and hepatic toxicity without rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  George Abraham; Dmitry Finkelberg; Linda M Spooner
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Peter E Pertel; Patricia Bernardo; Charles Fogarty; Peter Matthews; Rebeca Northland; Mark Benvenuto; Grace M Thorne; Steven A Luperchio; Robert D Arbeit; Jeff Alder
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Daptomycin.

Authors:  Mohsen Heidary; Azar Dohkt Khosravi; Saeed Khoshnood; Mohammad Javad Nasiri; Saleh Soleimani; Mehdi Goudarzi
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  The action mechanism of daptomycin.

Authors:  Scott D Taylor; Michael Palmer
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.