Literature DB >> 29406465

Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Daptomycin Versus Standard-of-care in Pediatric Patients With Staphylococcal Bacteremia.

Antonio C Arrieta1, John S Bradley2, Myra W Popejoy3, Mekki Bensaci3, Anjana Grandhi3, Paula Bokesch3, Chad Glasser3, Lihong Du3, Hernando Patino3, Nicholas A Kartsonis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus, including community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus, is an important cause of pediatric bacteremia. Daptomycin is a well-established treatment option for Gram-positive bacteremia in adults, but its safety and efficacy in children require confirmation.
METHODS: This was a randomized (2:1), evaluator-blinded, multicenter, phase 4 clinical trial comparing intravenous daptomycin with standard-of-care (SOC) for treatment of S. aureus bacteremia in 1- to 17-year-old patients (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01728376). Total treatment duration (intravenous followed by oral step-down therapy) was 5-42 days. Daptomycin was dosed once daily by patient age: 12-17 years, 7 mg/kg; 7-11 years, 9 mg/kg and 1-6 years, 12 mg/kg. The primary objective was to evaluate daptomycin safety in children who received ≥1 dose; secondary objectives included comparing daptomycin efficacy with SOC (the trial was not designed to confirm noninferiority) and pharmacokinetic analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-five children were randomized to daptomycin and 27 to SOC (primarily vancomycin or cefazolin); 90% had S. aureus. In both groups, 15% of patients had drug-related adverse events, primarily diarrhea (4% daptomycin, 8% SOC) and increased creatine phosphokinase (4% daptomycin, 0% SOC). Clinical success (blinded evaluator-assessed complete/partial resolution of bacteremia signs and symptoms 7-14 days after end-of-treatment) rates were similar for daptomycin (88%) and SOC (77%; 95% confidence interval for difference: -9% to 31%). Daptomycin plasma levels across age groups were comparable with those in adults receiving daptomycin at 6 mg/kg.
CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily, age-appropriate daptomycin was well tolerated in children with staphylococcal bacteremia; efficacy was comparable with SOC. Daptomycin in age-adjusted doses is a safe treatment alternative in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29406465     DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  11 in total

Review 1.  Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.

Authors:  Yu-Xuan Ma; Chen-Yu Wang; Yuan-Yuan Li; Jing Li; Qian-Qian Wan; Ji-Hua Chen; Franklin R Tay; Li-Na Niu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  Ceftaroline Plus Daptomycin for Refractory Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Child.

Authors:  Alan M Hall; Sean M McTigue
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

3.  Data mining for adverse drug reaction signals of daptomycin based on real-world data: a disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

Authors:  Jiao-Jiao Chen; Xue-Chen Huo; Shao-Xia Wang; Fei Wang; Quan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-09-30

4.  Daptomycin-Associated Diarrhea: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Abdalaziz M Awadelkarim; Isra Idris; Muhammad Abdelhai; Ahmed Yeddi; Eltaib Saad; Rashid Alhusain; John Dayco; Mohammed Ali; Lubna Salih
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-20

5.  Thoracic Spinal Cord Compression Secondary to Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: An Unusual Oncological Phenomenon.

Authors:  Eltaib A Saad; Monzer Abdalla; Abdalaziz M Awadelkarim; Osama Elkhider; Mohamed Agab; Akram Babkir; Isra Idris; Dorota Filipiuk
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-17

Review 6.  One Size Fits All? Application of Susceptible-Dose-Dependent Breakpoints to Pediatric Patients and Laboratory Reporting.

Authors:  Lindsey E Nielsen; Jeanne B Forrester; Jennifer Ellis Girotto; Aimee M Dassner; Romney Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Daptomycin.

Authors:  Nicolas Gregoire; Alexia Chauzy; Julien Buyck; Blandine Rammaert; William Couet; Sandrine Marchand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  CASSETTE-clindamycin adjunctive therapy for severe Staphylococcus aureus treatment evaluation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ravindra Dotel; Steven Y C Tong; Asha Bowen; Jane N Nelson; Matthew V N O'Sullivan; Anita J Campbell; Brendan J McMullan; Philip N Britton; Joshua R Francis; Damon P Eisen; Owen Robinson; Laurens Manning; Joshua S Davis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Safety and Efficacy of Daptomycin in Neonates with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Case Series Analysis.

Authors:  Yahya Mohzari; Fahad Aljobair; Ahmed Alrashed; Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq; Renad Abdullah Alshuraim; Suzan Suhail Asfour; Mountasser Mohammad Al-Mouqdad; Reem F Bamogaddam; Deemah Al-Anazi; Catherine E Zeilinger; Ahmad Alamer; Batool Mohammed Alhassan; Nagaraja Sreeharsha
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-07

10.  Efficacy and safety of daptomycin: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  María Teresa Rosanova; David Bes; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar; Norma Sberna; Estefania Herrera-Ramos; Roberto Luis Lede
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.