Literature DB >> 21349719

Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Darryl Lau1, Jasmine G Lee, Seunggu J Han, Daniel C Lu, Dean Chou.   

Abstract

Before the advent of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was performed to treat spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and spondylolysis. Minimally invasive TLIF has recently become more popular based upon the premise that a smaller, less traumatic incision should afford better recovery and outcomes. However, the learning curve associated with this technique must be considered. To analyze the perioperative factors associated with the learning curve in patients who underwent MIS TLIF versus open TLIF, we identified 22 patients who underwent TLIF from 2005 to 2008 within levels L4-S1 by the senior author (D.C.). Patients were subdivided into two groups according to whether they underwent: (i) MIS TLIF (10 patients, the first MIS TLIF procedures performed by D.C.); or (ii) open TLIF (12 patients). Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative factors were evaluated. Patients who underwent MIS TLIF had a statistically significant lower intraoperative transfusion rate, and rate of required postoperative surgical drains; and shorter periods of required drainage, and time to ambulation. However, the MIS TLIF group tended to have a higher rate of complications, which might have been associated with the learning curve. Both groups had a minimum of 1-year follow-up.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21349719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  44 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Patrick Belton; Hekmat Zarzour; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 2.  Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Armen R Deukmedjian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Hao Tan; Gabriel Liu; Ruimin Ng; Nishant Kumar; Hee-Kit Wong; Gabriel Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Choll W Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qu Jin-Tao; Tang Yu; Wang Mei; Tang Xu-Dong; Zhang Tian-Jian; Shi Guo-Hua; Chen Lei; Hu Yue; Wang Zi-Tian; Zhou Yue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Fumihiko Kato; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yudo Hachiya; Yuji Matsubara; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Yoshihito Sakai; Hideki Yagi; Ryuichi Shinjo; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Andrew C Kam; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Jiandong Tang; Xianpei Wu; Li Zhang; Baoyi Ke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gursukhman S Sidhu; Erik Henkelman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; Alan Hilibrand; D Greg Anderson; Jeffrey A Rihn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.