| Literature DB >> 36177313 |
Panke Zhang1, Jingxi Meng2, Mingliang Duan1, Dan Li1, Ruixin Wang1.
Abstract
Objective: To probe into the efficacy of Yishen Huashi granules combined with linagliptin tablets in the treatment of type 2 diabetic nephropathy (DN) and its effect on blood glucose and renal function in patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36177313 PMCID: PMC9514935 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4272520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Comparison of general data (n = 35).
| Observation indexes | Control group | Research group |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 58.51 ± 8.30 | 58.34 ± 8.40 | 0.085 | 0.932 |
| Genders | 0.238 | 0.626 | ||
| Male | 20 (57.14) | 22 (62.86) | ||
| Female | 15 (42.86) | 13 (37.14) | ||
|
| ||||
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 5.89 ± 1.12 | 6.00 ± 1.15 | 0.405 | 0.687 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 10.25 ± 0.67 | 10.34 ± 0.71 | 0.545 | 0.587 |
| 2h-PBG (mmol/L) | 12.56 ± 1.97 | 12.50 ± 1.88 | 0.130 | 0.897 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.80 ± 1.47 | 8.78 ± 1.50 | 0.056 | 0.955 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.47 ± 0.65 | 5.48 ± 0.53 | 0.071 | 0.944 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.08 ± 1.40 | 2.13 ± 0.38 | 0.204 | 0.839 |
| SCr (umol/L) | 73.05 ± 16.85 | 72.96 ± 17.10 | 0.22 | 0.982 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 8.53 ± 5.59 | 8.47 ± 5.41 | 0.046 | 0.964 |
|
| ||||
| Concomitant risk factors | ||||
| Hypertension | 29 (82.86) | 31 (88.57) | 0.467 | 0.495 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 20 (57.14) | 19 (54.29) | 0.058 | 0.810 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.86 ± 2.01 | 21.05 ± 2.10 | 0.387 | 0.700 |
| TNF- | 141.84 ± 24.10 | 142.48 ± 23.71 | 0.112 | 0.911 |
| IL-6 (ng/L) | 60.07 ± 8.37 | 60.20 ± 8.85 | 0.063 | 0.950 |
| Hs-CRP (mg/L) | 7.55 ± 1.85 | 7.48 ± 1.83 | 0.159 | 0.874 |
Comparison of glycemic indexes after treatment.
| Groups | Number of cases | FPG (mmol/L) | 2 h-PBG (mmol/L) | HbA1C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 35 | 8.70 ± 0.90 | 11.07 ± 1.97 | 8.55 ± 0.70 |
| Research group | 35 | 7.33 ± 0.80 | 10.10 ± 1.65 | 7.46 ± 0.68 |
|
| 6.731 | 2.233 | 6.608 | |
|
| <0.001 | 0.029 | <0.001 |
Comparison of blood lipid levels after treatment (n = 35).
| Groups | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | HDL (mmol/L) | LDL (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 4.70 ± 0.27 | 2.02 ± 0.26 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 3.18 ± 0.29 |
| Research group | 4.23 ± 0.24 | 1.85 ± 0.22 | 1.16 ± 0.13 | 2.51 ± 0.16 |
|
| 6.697 | 2.953 | 5.038 | 11.968 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of u-mALB levels. Notes: the transverse axis was before and after treatment, with the longitudinal axis as the u-mALB level (mmol/L). The u-mALB levels in the control group before and after treatment were (370.37 ± 40.36) and (260.78 ± 34.24), respectively, while in the research group were (371.45 ± 40.58) and (182.13 ± 30.56). indicated a remarkable difference in the u-mALB levels between both the groups after treatment (t = 10.138, P < 0.001).
Comparison of renal function indexes after treatment (n = 35).
| Groups | SCr (umol/L) | eGFR (ml/min·1.73 m2) | BUN (mmol/L) | UPro (g/24h) | UAER (ug/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 67.33 ± 8.14 | 80.64 ± 6.46 | 7.21 ± 2.15 | 1.15 ± 0.22 | 76.15 ± 10.72 |
| Research group | 62.12 ± 6.93 | 86.12 ± 10.96 | 6.23 ± 1.55 | 1.00 ± 0.18 | 70.83 ± 8.34 |
|
| 2.883 | 2.548 | 2.187 | 3.122 | 2.317 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.013 | 0.032 | 0.03 | 0.024 |
Figure 2Comparison of efficacy of TCM syndrome after treatment (n = 35). Notes: the transverse axis represented evaluation dimensions, with the longitudinal axis as the percentage (%). After treatment, there were 17 cases of significant remission, 12 cases of partial remission, 6 cases of invalid treatment, and a total of 29 cases of effective treatment in the control group; there were 25 significant remissions, 9 partial remissions, 1 invalid treatment, and a total of 34 effective treatment in the research group. suggested a remarkable difference in the total effective rate of treatment between both the groups (X2 = 3.968, P=0.046).