| Literature DB >> 34043214 |
Y Zhang1,2,3, H Yang4,5,6, L Zhao7,8,9, F Liu10,11,12, Y Zhong1,2,3, Y Wang7,8, S Li8, Q Su8, L Tang13, L Bai13, H Ren7,8, Y Zou7,8, S Wang1,2,3, S Zheng1,2,3, H Xu14, L Li14, J Zhang13, Z Chai15, M E Cooper15, N Tong16.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between urinary complement proteins and renal outcome in biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy (DN).Entities:
Keywords: Complement; Diabetic nephropathy; End-stage renal disease; Urinary proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34043214 PMCID: PMC8572220 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-021-01596-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocrinol Invest ISSN: 0391-4097 Impact factor: 4.256
Fig. 1Urinary untargeted proteomic result by filter-aided proteome preparation method. a Hierarchical cluster analysis of the up-regulated and down-regulated urinary proteins in healthy control participants, patients with type 2 diabetes, patients with type 2 diabetes and DN. The red bar in the figure indicated the complement and complement regulatory proteins. b Functional analysis by KEGG showed that urinary proteins that differed in expression are linked to the complement and coagulation cascades. KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
The clinical characteristics of patients stratified by eGFR decline rate
| Characteristics | Slow eGFR decliners ( | Progressive eGFR decliners ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD), y | 53 (9) | 52 (9) | 0.89 |
| Sex, Male, | 17 (65.4) | 15 (53.6) | 0.44 |
| Smoking, Never/Ex/Current, ( | 14/3/9 | 20/2/6 | 0.32 |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 25.8 (3.2) | 24.4 (3.1) | 0.43 |
| SBP, mean (SD), mmHg | 138 (21) | 141 (27) | 0.34 |
| DBP, mean (SD), mmHg | 81 (13) | 84 (12) | 0.71 |
| Duration of diabetes, median (IQR), months | 132 (96–180) | 66 (36–133) | 0.04 |
| HbA1c, median (IQR), % | 7.6 (6.8–7.9) | 7.5 (6.6–9.2) | 0.72 |
| FPG, median (IQR), mg/dL | 151.6 (112.3–194.9) | 135.8 (99.4–161.6) | 0.69 |
| Hemoglobin, mean (SD), g/L | 133.7 (24.7) | 125.5 (24.0) | 0.05 |
| Serum albumin, mean (SD), g/L | 41.8 (4.7) | 35.6 (7.1) | < 0.001 |
| eGFR, median (IQR), mL/min/1.73 m2 | 67.1 (46.2–92.3) | 78.2 (50.2–94.8) | 0.37 |
| 24-h proteinuria, median (IQR), g/d | 1.44 (0.53–2.74) | 3.48 (1.50–7.6) | < 0.001 |
| uACR, median (IQR), (mg/g) | 739 (164–1488) | 1727 (936–3692) | 0.04 |
| RAAS inhibitors, No. (%) | 23 (88.5) | 25 (89.3) | 0.90 |
| OHA therapy, No. (%) | 15 (57.7) | 15 (53.6) | 0.76 |
| Insulin therapy, No. (%) | 19 (73.1) | 18 (64.3) | 0.48 |
| Statins, No. (%) | 17 (65.4) | 19 (67.9) | 0.84 |
| RPS classificationa, | 0.04 | ||
| I | 5 (19.2) | 2 (7.1) | |
| IIa | 6 (23.1) | 6 (21.4) | |
| IIb | 4 (15.4) | 5 (17.9) | |
| III | 9 (34.6) | 12 (42.9) | |
| IV | 2 (7.7) | 3 (10.7) | |
| IFTAa, | 0.04 | ||
| Score 0 | 3 (11.5) | 2 (7.1) | |
| Score 1 | 15 (57.7) | 14 (50.0) | |
| Score 2 | 7 (26.9) | 10 (35.7) | |
| Score 3 | 1 (3.8) | 2 (7.1) | |
| Interstitial inflammationa, | 0.22 | ||
| Score 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Score 1 | 20 (76.9) | 25 (89.3) | |
| Score 2 | 6 (23.1) | 3 (10.7) | |
| Arteriosclerosisa, | 0.68 | ||
| Score 0 | 3 (11.5) | 3 (10.7) | |
| Score 1 | 13 (50.0) | 11 (39.3) | |
| Score 2 | 10 (38.5) | 14 (50.0) | |
| Arteriolar hyalinosisa, | 0.60 | ||
| Score 0 | 1 (3.8) | 3 (10.7) | |
| Score 1 | 10 (38.5) | 9 (32.1) | |
| Score 2 | 15 (57.7) | 16 (57.1) |
BMI body mass index; SBP systolic blood pressure; DBP diastolic blood pressure; FPG fasting plasma glucose; eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c hemoglobin A1c; uACR urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio; RAAS renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system; OHA oral hypoglycemic agent; RPS Renal Pathology Society; IFTA interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy
aDefined by RPS DN classification. Data are presented as means (SDs) for continuous variables with a normal distribution, as medians (25th–75th percentiles) for continuous variables without a normal distribution, and as percentages for categorical variables
Fig. 2Distributions of urinary complement proteins among control participants, patients with type 2 diabetes, and diabetic patients with associated DN. DN diabetic nephropathy
Fig. 3Matrix of correlation coefficients. a Matrix of correlation coefficients between urinary complement proteins and baseline parameters of diabetic kidney injury by Spearman’s correlation analysis. b Matrix of correlation coefficients between urinary complement proteins and annual eGFR decline during the follow-up period. c Matrix of correlation coefficients between urinary complement proteins and pathological parameters of DN by linear regression analysis. Cell color indicates the strengths and directions of the correlation from blue (negative correlation) to white (no correlation) to red (positive correlation). DN diabetic nephropathy
Fig. 4Association of urinary complement proteins with renal outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes and DN. Univariable (a) and two multivariable (b, c) Cox proportional hazards models by individual complement proteins at the renal endpoint. (d) The third multivariable Cox proportional hazards model included all proteins that were individually significantly associated with ESRD in the second multivariable model. aAdjusted for age, sex, baseline log2 (baseline eGFR) and log2 (baseline urinary protein concentration); bAdjusted for age, sex, baseline log2 (baseline eGFR) and log2 (baseline urinary protein concentration), Renal Pathology Society glomerular classification, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. CFAI complement factor I; CFAB complement factor B; CFAH complement factor H; FHR1 factor H-related protein 1; FHR2 factor H-related protein 2; DAF decay-accelerating factor; CLUS clusterin
Fig. 5Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of ESRD. Urinary abundance of CFAH and DAF had a larger AUC than clinical (a) or pathological parameters (b). The model contains covariates and CFAH or DAF had lager AUC than that of the model that only contains clinical parameters (c) or only pathological parameters (d). Covariates 1 were baseline eGFR and proteinuria. Covariates 2 were RPS glomerular classification, IFTA, interstitial inflammation, arteriosclerosis, and AH. ESRD end-stage renal disease; AUC area under the curve; CFAH complement factor H; DAF decay-accelerating factor; eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate; RPS Renal Pathology Society; IFTA interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; AH artery hyalinosis