| Literature DB >> 36176803 |
Haibo Zhao1, Rubing Bai1, Ran Liu1, Hong Wang2.
Abstract
New energy vehicle is an innovative means of transportation, and its development has been widely concerned all over the world. However, few studies investigate the purchase intention of new energy vehicles (NEVs) from the perspective of combining altruism and cultural factors. Based on the extended norm activation model (NAM), this study explores the influencing factors of NEVs' purchasing intention and the moderating effects of "mianzi" and green peer influence. According to 302 valid questionnaires, the results indicated that the extended NAM model is useful in predicting consumer purchasing behavior with an improved explanatory power in purchase intentions of NEVs from 15 to 26%. The awareness of consequences, the ascription of responsibility, and green self-identity have a positive impact on the personal norm. Personal norm and green self-identity are positively associated with purchase intention. "Mianzi" and green peer influence positively moderate the relationship between green self-identity and intention to purchase. The findings give new insights into the impact of cultural factors on purchasing NEVs and profound suggestions for policymakers and enterprises to promote the development of NEVs.Entities:
Keywords: green peer influence; green self-identity; mianzi (face); new energy vehicles; norm activation model; purchase intention
Year: 2022 PMID: 36176803 PMCID: PMC9514222 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Research model.
Demographic characteristics of the sample.
| Variable | Categories | Frequency | Percent |
| Gender | Male | 135 | 44.7 |
| Female | 167 | 55.3 | |
| Age | ≤20 | 11 | 3.6 |
| 21–30 | 199 | 65.9 | |
| 31–40 | 68 | 22.5 | |
| 41–50 | 20 | 6.6 | |
| ≥51 | 4 | 1.3 | |
| Education | High school or below | 6 | 2 |
| Junior college degree | 19 | 6.3 | |
| Bachelor’s degree | 107 | 35.4 | |
| Master’s degree or above | 170 | 56.3 | |
| Occupation | Student | 120 | 39.7 |
| Working | 138 | 45.7 | |
| Others | 44 | 14.6 | |
| Monthly income (CNY) | ≤3,000 | 103 | 34.1 |
| 3,001–5,000 | 53 | 17.5 | |
| 5,001–8,000 | 43 | 14.2 | |
| 8,001–10,000 | 41 | 13.6 | |
| >10,000 | 62 | 20.5 |
Results of measurement model analysis.
| Construct | α | CR | AVE |
| Awareness of consequence | 0.828 | 0.832 | 0.556 |
| Ascription of responsibility | 0.864 | 0.873 | 0.699 |
| Personal norm | 0.841 | 0.853 | 0.660 |
| Green self-identity | 0.748 | 0.790 | 0.564 |
| Mianzi | 0.879 | 0.882 | 0.716 |
| Green peer influence | 0.927 | 0.928 | 0.762 |
| Purchase intention | 0.895 | 0.898 | 0.747 |
α, Cronbach’s alpha; CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted.
Discriminant validity analysis.
| Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Awareness of consequence | 0.746 | ||||||
| Ascription of responsibility | 0.074 | 0.836 | |||||
| Personal norm | 0.223 | 0.16 | 0.812 | ||||
| Green self-identity | 0.195 | 0.067 | 0.25 | 0.751 | |||
| Mianzi | 0.156 | −0.031 | 0.181 | 0.284 | 0.846 | ||
| Green peer influence | 0.135 | 0.040 | 0.388 | 0.508 | 0.488 | 0.873 | |
| Purchase intention | 0.30 | 0.018 | 0.390 | 0.430 | 0.444 | 0.486 | 0.864 |
1. Off-diagonal elements are correlations between constructs; 2. Diagonal elements are the square root of average variance extracted.
FIGURE 2Results of hypothesis testing. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Hierarchical regression results.
| Dependent variables | Purchase Intention | |||
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |
|
| ||||
| Gender | 0.093 | 0.086 | 0.166 | 0.169 |
| Age | –0.094 | –0.028 | –0.124 | –0.069 |
| Education | 0.103 | 0.108 | 0.113 | 0.109 |
| Occupation | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0.038 | 0.032 |
| Income | –0.013 | 0.019 | –0.023 | 0.007 |
| 2. Independent variable Green self-identity | 0.331 | 0.270 | ||
| Independent variable Personal norm | 0.318 | 0.238 | ||
| 3. Moderating variable Mianzi | 0.328 | 0.368 | ||
| Moderating variable Peer influence | 0.340 | 0.378 | ||
| 4. Moderating effect | ||||
| Green self-identity | 0.108 | |||
| Personal norm | –0.006 | |||
| Green self-identity | 0.085 | |||
| Personal norm | –0.002 | |||
|
| 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.288 | 0.287 |
| Adj. | 0.275 | 0.275 | 0.269 | 0.268 |
|
| 15.267 | 15.281 | 14.837 | 14.748 |
*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.
FIGURE 3The moderating effect of “mianzi.”
FIGURE 4The moderating effect of green peer influence.