| Literature DB >> 36175997 |
Hila Zelicha1, Nora Kloting2, Alon Kaplan1, Anat Yaskolka Meir1, Ehud Rinott1, Gal Tsaban1, Yoash Chassidim3, Matthias Bluher4, Uta Ceglarek2, Berend Isermann2, Michael Stumvoll2, Rita Nana Quayson2, Martin von Bergen2, Beatrice Engelmann2, Ulrike E Rolle-Kampczyk2, Sven-Bastiaan Haange2, Kieran M Tuohy5, Camilla Diotallevi5, Ilan Shelef6, Frank B Hu7,8,9, Meir J Stampfer7,8,9, Iris Shai10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mediterranean (MED) diet is a rich source of polyphenols, which benefit adiposity by several mechanisms. We explored the effect of the green-MED diet, twice fortified in dietary polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat, on visceral adipose tissue (VAT).Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean; Obesity; Plant-based diet; Polyphenols; Visceral adipose tissue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36175997 PMCID: PMC9523931 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02525-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 11.150
Baseline characteristics of the DIRECT-PLUS study population* (n = 286)
| HDG ( | MED ( | Green-MED ( | Entire ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men, % of the study population | 86 (87.8%) | 85 (88.5%) | 81 (88.0%) | 252 (88.1%) |
| Age, years | 51.1 (10.6) | 51.5 (10.5) | 49.8 (10.1) | 50.8 (10.4) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 31.2 (3.8) | 31.2 (4.0) | 31.2 (4.0) | 31.2 (3.9) |
| WC, cm | ||||
| Men | 110.7 (10.1) | 110.7 (9.4) | 110.0 (7.3) | 110.5 (9.0) |
| Women | 103.8 (9.7) | 104.9 (10.0) | 100.8 (9.9) | 103.2 (9.7) |
| Blood pressure, mmHg | ||||
| Diastolic | 80.2 (11.3) | 81.8 (8.9) | 81.0 (10.0) | 81.0 (10.1) |
| Systolic | 130.2 (14.3) | 130.1 (12.5) | 129.8 (15.1) | 130.1 (13.9) |
| Ratio of triglycerides to HDL cholesterol | 3.8 (2.5) | 3.6 (2.1) | 3.4 (2.0) | 3.6 (2.2) |
| Serum LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 126.8 (32.3) | 127.1 (31.3) | 124.0 (28.6) | 126.0 (30.7) |
| Ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol | 2.9 (0.9) | 2.9 (1.0) | 2.9 (1.0) | 2.9 (1.0) |
| Serum HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | ||||
| Men | 43.4 (9.9) | 46.0 (10.0) | 43.0 (10.7) | 44.2 (10.2) |
| Women | 59.6 (12.6) | 53.5 (16.2) | 62.0 (13.4) | 58.4 (14.1) |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 102.1 (17.7) | 100.6 (13.4) | 102.9 (20.0) | 101.8 (17.2) |
| Fasting insulin, μIU/mL | 15.3 (9.0) | 14.4 (7.1) | 14.1 (7.3 | 14.6 (7.9) |
| HOMA-IR | 4.0 (2.8) | 3.6 (1.9) | 3.6 (2.2) | 3.7 (2.3) |
| HbA1C | ||||
| % | 5.5 (0.7) | 5.4 (0.5) | 5.5 (0.7) | 5.5 (0.7) |
| mmol/mol | 37 (7.3) | 36 (4.3) | 37 (7.3) | 37 (7.3) |
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 3.0 (2.1) | 3.1 (1.8) | 3.0 (2.1) | 3.0 (2.0) |
| Chemerin, ng/mL | 205.9 (44.1) | 208.6 (43.4) | 207.7 (42.7) | 207.4 (43.3) |
| Leptin, ng/mL | 13.7 (12.2) | 15.0 (12.4) | 14.3 (11.9) | 14.3 (12.1) |
| Visceral adipose tissue, cm2 | 134.3 (49.3) | 130.5 (43.6) | 130.4 (53.7) | 131.8 (48.8) |
| Deep subcutaneous adipose tissue, cm2 | 218.5 (73.1) | 217.6 (62.8) | 212.6 (64.7) | 216.3 (66.9) |
| Superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue, cm2 | 115.3 (45.9) | 117.1 (45.5) | 114.3 (55.3) | 115.6 (49.0) |
| Visceral adipose tissue | ||||
| Men | 30.3 (8.6) | 28.6 (7.4) | 30.7 (9.6) | 29.9 (8.6) |
| Women | 19.6 (3.1) | 24.4 (7.3) | 16.6 (6.8)† | 19.9 (6.5) |
| Deep subcutaneous adipose tissue | ||||
| Men | 46.5 (6.1) | 47.6 (5.8) | 46.7 (6.7) | 46.9 (6.2) |
| Women | 45.3 (3.2) | 39.6 (8.9) | 43.3 (5.8) | 43.0 (6.3) |
| Superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue | ||||
| Men | 23.2 (5.4) | 23.8 (5.4) | 22.6 (5.7) | 23.2 (5.5) |
| Women | 35.1 (3.5) | 35.9 (6.0) | 40.1 (8.5) | 37.0 (6.5) |
Significance between the groups was assessed according to the ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables
BMI body mass index, HDG healthy dietary guidelines, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR homeostatic model of insulin resistance, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, MED Mediterranean, WC waist circumference
*Values are presented as mean (standard deviations) for continuous variables and as number and % for categorical variables. A total of 286 available abdominal adipose tissue MRI
†The visceral adipose tissue proportion among the women population was significant across the groups (p = 0.02) between the green-MED and the MED groups
Fig. 1Eighteen-month changes in abdominal adipose tissues (mean (SE)) between the intervention groups (n = 286). After 18 months of intervention, all groups reduced all three abdominal adipose tissues significantly. Significant differences in VAT% change between the green-MED group and MED, as well as HDG groups, were observed after adjustment for age, sex, and waist circumference change. Deep SAT, deep subcutaneous; superficial SAT, superficial subcutaneous; HDG, healthy dietary guidelines; MED, Mediterranean; VAT, visceral adipose tissue. *Significant within-group change vs. baseline at the 0.05 level. **Significant differences between the groups at the 0.05 level
Fig. 2Multivariate linear regression models were adjusted for age, sex, weight changes, and the three intervention groups. We aimed to identify the independent associations between the changes in abdominal fat depots and biomarkers in multivariate models, adjusted for age, sex, intervention group, and weight loss. While VAT loss was independently associated with an improved lipid profile, the deep SAT loss was independently and significantly associated with beneficial glycemic biomarkers during the intervention (p < 0.05 for all). The association between changes in blood biomarkers and reduction in abdominal fat subdepots is presented by the β standardized coefficient. *p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model of insulin resistance; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Fig. 3Multivariate models for the assessment of the associations between nutritional components of the green-MED diet with changes in VAT% adjusted for age and sex. Mankai consumption was adjusted for age and referred to the green-MED group only. Mankai consumption categories (18 months): low/non: ≤ 1/week, medium: 2–3/week, and high: > 3/week; walnut consumption categories (18 months): low/non: 0 to 1–3 times/month, medium: 1–2/week to 3–4/week, and high: more than 5–6/week; serum folate tertiles (of 18-month change in serum folate, ng/dL): lower ≤ − 0.41, medium − 0.40 to 1.46, and top ≥ 1.47; fiber consumption tertiles (18-month change, g): lower ≤ − 6.73, medium − 6.72 to − 0.17, and top ≥ − 0.16; plasma polyphenol tertiles (18 months, mg/L): lower ≤ 0.23, medium 0.24 to 0.47, and top ≥ 0.48; specific polyphenols (urine and plasma) and VAT change after 18 months of intervention adjusted for age and sex: urine urolithin-A delta 18 months compared to baseline (log2) tertiles: T1 ≤ 0, T2 = 0 to 4.92, and T3 = 4.92+. r = − 0.241, p < 0.001, q = 0.00036 (MC -139 metabolites). Plasma Hippuric-acid tertiles (time18, mg/L): T1 ≤ 0.21, T2 = 0.21 to 0.44, and T3 = 0.44+. *Significant differences between the groups at the 0.05 level. VAT, visceral adipose tissue