Literature DB >> 36175765

Learned low priority of attention after training to suppress color singleton distractor.

Zhibang Huang1,2,3,4, Sheng Li5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Allocating attention to significant events, such as a salient object, is effortless. Our brain is effective on this type of processing because doing so is generally beneficial for survival. However, a salient object could also be distracting and ignoring it costs a large amount of cognitive resource. In the present study, we conducted two behavioral experiments to investigate the effect of learned suppression of a salient color. Particularly, we were interested in the effect of learning in a new task context in which the previously suppressed color was task irrelevant. In Experiment 1, we trained the participants for five days with explicit instruction to suppress a color singleton distractor in a visual search task. We measured the effect of training with a dot probe task before and after the training. Colors in the dot probe task only served as the background and were not associated with the position of the target dot. However, we found that attention was involuntarily biased away from the previously suppressed color. In Experiment 2, the color singleton could either be the target or distractor in the visual search task, making the suppression of the color singleton inefficient for task performance. The results showed no training effect in the dot probe task after this manipulation. These findings provided direct evidence for the learned low priority of attention after training to suppress the color singleton distractor.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generalization; Involuntary; Saliency; Suppression

Year:  2022        PMID: 36175765     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02571-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  36 in total

Review 1.  The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 4.  Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how, and where.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Francesco Marini; David Pascucci; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-02-14

5.  Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-02-18

6.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Authors:  Jason T Arita; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Visual Perceptual Learning and Models.

Authors:  Barbara Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 6.422

8.  Representing Color Ensembles.

Authors:  Andrey Chetverikov; Gianluca Campana; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.