Literature DB >> 3617511

Sighting dominance and egocentric localization.

C Porac, S Coren.   

Abstract

Theories of the perception of visual direction use, either a hypothetical "projection center" midway between the two eyes, or the line of sight of the sighting dominant eye, as a reference point for egocentric localization. Seventy-five observers made judgments of the visual straight ahead. Their judgments varied as a function of both viewing condition and eye dominance. Judgments were biased toward the side of the viewing eye during monocular exposure, while binocular judgments were intermediate in their placement. Both monocular and binocular judgments were shifted in the direction of the sighting dominant eye, suggesting that the reference point for visual localization lies between the midpoint of the interocular axis and the line of sight of the sighting eye.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3617511     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90057-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Eye dominance predicts fMRI signals in human retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  Janine D Mendola; Ian P Conner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  The relationship between eye position and egocentric visual direction.

Authors:  R Barbeito; T L Simpson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

3.  Monocular and binocular vision in the performance of a complex skill.

Authors:  Thomas Heinen; Pia M Vinken
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Orientation-specific luminance aftereffects.

Authors:  H H Mikaelian; M J Linton; M Phillips
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

5.  Sensory compensation in sound localization in people with one eye.

Authors:  Adria E N Hoover; Laurence R Harris; Jennifer K E Steeves
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Relative contributions of the two eyes to perceived egocentric visual direction in normal binocular vision.

Authors:  Deepika Sridhar; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Non-target stimuli in the visual field influence movement preparation in upper-limb reaching.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Laura J Morris
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Social encouragement can influence manual preference in 6 month-old-infants.

Authors:  Françoise Morange-Majoux; Emmanuel Devouche
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-04

9.  Cyclopean, Dominant, and Non-dominant Gaze Tracking for Smooth Pursuit Gaze Interaction.

Authors:  Tomer Elbaum; Michael Wagner; Assaf Botzer
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 0.957

10.  Lateral visual occlusion does not change walking trajectories.

Authors:  Matt J Dunn; Simon K Rushton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.