Literature DB >> 24150627

Monocular and binocular vision in the performance of a complex skill.

Thomas Heinen1, Pia M Vinken.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the role of binocular and monocular vision in 16 gymnasts as they perform a handspring on vault. In particular we reasoned, if binocular visual information is eliminated while experts and apprentices perform a handspring on vault, and their performance level changes or is maintained, then such information must or must not be necessary for their best performance. If the elimination of binocular vision leads to differences in gaze behavior in either experts or apprentices, this would answer the question of an adaptive gaze behavior, and thus if this is a function of expertise level or not. Gaze behavior was measured using a portable and wireless eye-tracking system in combination with a movement-analysis system. Results revealed that gaze behavior differed between experts and apprentices in the binocular and monocular conditions. In particular, apprentices showed less fixations of longer duration in the monocular condition as compared to experts and the binocular condition. Apprentices showed longer blink duration than experts in both, the monocular and binocular conditions. Eliminating binocular vision led to a shorter repulsion phase and a longer second flight phase in apprentices. Experts exhibited no differences in phase durations between binocular and monocular conditions. Findings suggest, that experts may not rely on binocular vision when performing handsprings, and movement performance maybe influenced in apprentices when eliminating binocular vision. We conclude that knowledge about gaze-movement relationships may be beneficial for coaches when teaching the handspring on vault in gymnastics. Key pointsSkills in gymnastics are quite complex and the athlete has to meet temporal and spatial constraints to perform these skills adequately. Visual information pickup is thought to be integral in complex skill performance. However, there is no compelling evidence on the role of binocular vision in complex skill performance.The study reveals, that apprentices optimize their gaze behavior and their movement behavior when binocular vision is eliminated, whereas experts gaze behavior and movement behavior is uninfluenced by eliminating binocular vision.We state, that binocular vision is not necessary for experts to perform to their best. However, eliminating binocular vision could be part of an optimization strategy for apprentices, which could in turn be transferred to new training programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experts-novice paradigm; gaze behavior; gymnastics

Year:  2011        PMID: 24150627      PMCID: PMC3737810     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  17 in total

1.  Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement.

Authors:  J Coull; P L Weir; L Tremblay; D J Weeks; D Elliott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Peripheral vision and back tuck somersaults.

Authors:  C D Davlin; W A Sands; B B Shultz
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2001-10

3.  The role of vision in control of orientation in a back tuck somersault.

Authors:  C D Davlin; W A Sands; B B Shultz
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  How do somersaulters land on their feet?

Authors:  D N Lee; D S Young; D Rewt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Characterization of the vestibulo-ocular reflex evoked by high-velocity movements.

Authors:  François D Roy; R D Tomlinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Significant and meaningful effects in sports biomechanics research.

Authors:  Duane Knudson
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.832

7.  How is body orientation controlled during somersaulting?

Authors:  B G Bardy; M Laurent
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Multiple comparison procedures updated.

Authors:  J Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 9.  The knowledge base of the oculomotor system.

Authors:  M F Land; S Furneaux
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Monocular and binocular vision in one-hand ball catching: interocular integration.

Authors:  I Olivier; D J Weeks; J Lyons; K L Ricker; D Elliott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  4 in total

1.  A clinically convenient test to measure binocular balance across spatial frequency in amblyopia.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Min; Yu Mao; Shijia Chen; Zhifen He; Robert F Hess; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-18

2.  The effects of optically and digitally simulated aniseikonia on stereopsis.

Authors:  David A Atchison; Thien Nguyen; Katrina L Schmid; Archayeeta Rakshit; Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  Stereopsis and Response Times between Collegiate Table Tennis Athletes and Non-Athletes.

Authors:  Jiahn-Shing Lee; Shih-Tsung Chang; Li-Chuan Shieh; Ai-Yin Lim; Wei-Sheng Peng; Wei-Min Chen; Yen-Hsiu Liu; Lai-Chu See
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Binocular visual deficits at mid to high spatial frequency in treated amblyopes.

Authors:  Shijia Chen; Seung Hyun Min; Ziyun Cheng; Yue Xiong; Xi Yu; Lili Wei; Yu Mao; Robert F Hess; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.