Literature DB >> 8448975

Aminoglycoside forecasting in neutropenic patients with cancer.

J L Kosirog1, R M Rospond, C Destache, P Hall.   

Abstract

To validate the population pharmacokinetic parameters of aminoglycoside disposition in patients with cancer, a retrospective evaluation of predictive performance of a Bayesian program was performed in 155 patients from 1986 to 1989 who received amikacin, gentamicin or tobramycin. Each patient received 1 of the 3 drugs and had initial drug concentration determination, with a second set of drug concentrations drawn < or = 14 days after the initial dose. Predictions of 64 amikacin, 144 gentamicin and 102 tobramycin concentrations were generated using 1-compartment model pharmacokinetic parameters, serum creatinine values, patients' dosage history and demographic data. The mean (+/- SD) observed (and predicted) serum concentrations for amikacin were 18.9 +/- 14.8 mg/L (17.2 +/- 14.1 mg/L); for gentamicin were 4.49 +/- 3.58 mg/L (4.26 +/- 3.33 mg/L) and for tobramycin were 4.52 +/- 3.70 mg/L (4.05 +/- 3.49 mg/L) [p > 0.05]. Results demonstrated minimal bias with a mean error in gentamicin concentrations of -0.236 (95% CI -0.533: 0.0613). Significant (p < 0.05) under prediction occurred in concentrations of tobramycin [-0.474 mg/L (95% CI -0.842: -0.0107)] and amikacin [-1.77 mg/L (95% CI -3.42: -0.114)]. Good precision is indicated by a mean squared error for gentamicin of 3.35 mg/L (95% CI 1.70: 4.99) and for tobramycin of 3.64 mg/L (95% CI 1.83: 5.44). Fair precision is demonstrated by amikacin [46.1 mg/L (95% CI 27.3: 65.0)]. Similar results were shown in a separate peak/trough analysis. These data indicate that aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in patients with cancer can be predicted with minimal bias and good precision using a Bayesian forecasting program for gentamicin and tobramycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8448975     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199324010-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  28 in total

1.  Alterations in aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in patients with cancer.

Authors:  G M Higa; W E Murray
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1987-12

2.  A Bayesian feedback method of aminoglycoside dosing.

Authors:  M E Burton; D C Brater; P S Chen; R B Day; P J Huber; M R Vasko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Evaluation of a microcomputer program for predicting tobramycin serum concentrations.

Authors:  S R Abel; G R Aronoff
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1984-11

4.  Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J L Segal; D R Gray; S K Gordon; I M Eltorai; F Khonsari
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug

5.  Prediction of gentamicin serum levels using a one-compartment open linear pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  M Chow; J Deglin; A Harralson; R Bartlett; R Quintiliani
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1978-09

6.  Accuracy of serum gentamicin concentration predictions generated by a personal-computer software system.

Authors:  J D Robinson; R C Hatton; W L Russell; D Klapp; L M Lopez
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct

7.  Wide interpatient variations in gentamicin dose requirements for geriatric patients.

Authors:  D E Zaske; P Irvine; L M Strand; R G Strate; R J Cipolle; J Rotschafer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Increased dosage requirements of gentamicin in burn patients.

Authors:  D E Zaske; R J Sawchuk; D N Gerding; R G Strate
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1976-10

9.  Altered gentamicin distribution in ascitic patients.

Authors:  M A Gill; J W Kern
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1979-12

10.  Comparison of Sawchuk-Zaske and Bayesian forecasting for aminoglycosides in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  C P Denaro; P J Ravenscroft
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a Bayesian pharmacokinetic estimator and optimal, sparse sampling strategies for ceftazidime.

Authors:  A D Kashuba; C H Ballow; A Forrest
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults.

Authors:  M Tod; O Lortholary; D Seytre; R Semaoun; B Uzzan; L Guillevin; P Casassus; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Individualising aminoglycoside dosage regimens after therapeutic drug monitoring: simple or complex pharmacokinetic methods?

Authors:  M M Tod; C Padoin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.