Alton Wern Jie Hong1, J James2,3, D Stoney2, M Law2,3. 1. Eastern Health Breast and Cancer Centre, 8 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC, 3128, Australia. altonhongwernjie@gmail.com. 2. Eastern Health Breast and Cancer Centre, 8 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC, 3128, Australia. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: More than 80% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Preservation of cosmetically acceptable breasts is an inherent aim of all breast-conserving efforts-this can, however, be difficult to assess objectively. Compounding this is the difference in perception of breast cosmesis between patients and surgeons. This study compares the concordance of a new subscale-based cosmetic score (TCS) with the patient's perception. METHOD: Eastern Health Breast and Cancer Centre conducted this study on patients who had completed their BCT and radiotherapy. Participation was voluntary and involved permitting an assessor (breast surgery fellow or consultant) to grade cosmetic outcomes to generate a Total Cosmesis Score (TCS). The patients blinded to this assessment were then asked to complete the postoperative segment of the BCT module of the Breast-Q questionnaire. TCS from surgeon assessment was compared against patient assessment (questions BQ1i and BQ1k specifically). Cohen's kappa was calculated to define the strength of the inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients with a mean age of 59 (range 27-89) participated in the study. TCS was low in 26% and high in 74% of participants. 76% and 69% of participants were satisfied when answering Breast-Q questions 'How your lumpectomy breast looks?' and 'How you look in the mirror unclothed?' respectively (Cohen's k = 0.464, 95% CI 0.337-0.591, p < 0.01). The agreement between the TCS and the patient assessment was poor (Cohen's k = 0.172, 95% CI - 0.020-2.093, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Cosmetic outcomes scored using TCS by surgeons do not match patient's own assessment of the cosmetic result.
INTRODUCTION: More than 80% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Preservation of cosmetically acceptable breasts is an inherent aim of all breast-conserving efforts-this can, however, be difficult to assess objectively. Compounding this is the difference in perception of breast cosmesis between patients and surgeons. This study compares the concordance of a new subscale-based cosmetic score (TCS) with the patient's perception. METHOD: Eastern Health Breast and Cancer Centre conducted this study on patients who had completed their BCT and radiotherapy. Participation was voluntary and involved permitting an assessor (breast surgery fellow or consultant) to grade cosmetic outcomes to generate a Total Cosmesis Score (TCS). The patients blinded to this assessment were then asked to complete the postoperative segment of the BCT module of the Breast-Q questionnaire. TCS from surgeon assessment was compared against patient assessment (questions BQ1i and BQ1k specifically). Cohen's kappa was calculated to define the strength of the inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients with a mean age of 59 (range 27-89) participated in the study. TCS was low in 26% and high in 74% of participants. 76% and 69% of participants were satisfied when answering Breast-Q questions 'How your lumpectomy breast looks?' and 'How you look in the mirror unclothed?' respectively (Cohen's k = 0.464, 95% CI 0.337-0.591, p < 0.01). The agreement between the TCS and the patient assessment was poor (Cohen's k = 0.172, 95% CI - 0.020-2.093, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Cosmetic outcomes scored using TCS by surgeons do not match patient's own assessment of the cosmetic result.
Authors: F Fitzal; W Krois; H Trischler; L Wutzel; O Riedl; U Kühbelböck; B Wintersteiner; M J Cardoso; P Dubsky; M Gnant; R Jakesz; T Wild Journal: Breast Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; N Vora; K R Desai; J O Archambeau; J A Lipsett Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1985-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Max Hendrik Haloua; Nicole Marianna Alexandra Krekel; Gerrit Johannes Albertus Jacobs; Barbara Zonderhuis; Mark-Bram Bouman; Marlon Eugène Buncamper; Franciscus Bernardus Niessen; Henri Adolf Hubert Winters; Caroline Terwee; Sybren Meijer; Monique Petrousjka van den Tol Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2014-09-22