| Literature DB >> 36164579 |
Aziz Drioiche1,2, Fatima Zahra Radi1, Atika Ailli1, Amal Bouzoubaa1, Amale Boutakiout1, Soumia Mekdad1, Omkulthom Al Kamaly3, Asmaa Saleh3, Mohamed Maouloua2, Dalila Bousta4, Server Sahpaz5, Fadoua El Makhoukhi1, Touriya Zair1.
Abstract
Thymus vulgaris, Thymus satureioides, and Thymus zygis are endemic Moroccan species that are intensively used due to their extensive medications and culinary properties. To enhance and preserve these overexploited species, the effect of provenance on the chemical composition of essential oils and antimicrobial activity against human pathogens were studied. Essential oils (EO) obtained by hydrodistillation from the flowering tops of thyme species were analyzed by GC-SM. The determination of minimum inhibitory (MIC), bactericidal (MBC), and fungicide (MFC) concentrations of EO were studied by microplate microdilution. The correlation between the chemical composition of EO and antimicrobial properties were evaluated using R software. The samples studied gave variable yields, ranging from 0.70 ± 0.03% to 4.12 ± 0.21%. The main constituents of Thymus vulgaris harvested from the municipality of El Hammam are carvacrol (68.8%), γ-terpinene (11.5%), and p-cymene (3.9%), while borneol (41.3% and 31.7%) and carvacrol (14.6% and 9.8%) are the most abundant in Thymus satureioides of the communes of Tata and Tigrigra respectively. For Thymus zygis, the results revealed the dominance of carvacrol (51.7% and 57.5%) for the municipalities of Tigrigra and Ain Aghbal, thymol (47.1% and 42.1%) for the municipalities of Bensmim and Timahdite respectively. These chemical profiles have similarities, but also reveal differences from the results given in the literature. In addition, the essential oils most active towards the microorganisms evaluated were those of Thymus vulgaris, followed by Thymus zygis and Thymus satureioides. These EO have very powerful MIC (MIC ⩽ 300 μg/ml) against Gram-negative bacteria, and in particular, concerning Enterobacters cloacae, Citrobacter koseri, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Thymus zygis EO is the most active on candidates compared to Thymus vulgaris and Thymus satureioides EO, except Candida dubliniensis which was inhibited by Thymus satureioides EO from the commune of Azrou with a MIC = 18.75 μg/ml. The correlation determined between the major components and MIC showed that phenols have the strongest positive effects on antimicrobial properties, followed by terpenes and non-aromatic alcohols. In addition, different sensitivities of pathogens to chemical families have been observed against Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter koseri, Candida parapsilosis, Staphylococcus aureus multiresistant, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Aspergillus niger. Our results support the idea that these oils could be very useful in flavoring, food preservation, as well as a source of antimicrobial agents of great power against multidrug-resistant strains.Entities:
Keywords: Borneol; Carvacrol; MBC; MFC; MIC; Multiresistant microorganisms; Thymol; Thymus satureioides; Thymus vulgaris; Thymus zygis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36164579 PMCID: PMC9508645 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.06.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.562
Distribution of individuals in the populations of the thyme species studied and their harvest sites by region.
| N° | Harvest site | Parts used | Latitude (x) | Longitude (y) | Altitude (m) | Harvest year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khenifra | El hammam | Flowering tops | 5° 28′ 09″ W | 33° 10′ 28″ N | 1125 | 2018 | |||
| TSAZ | Ifrane | Azrou | 5° 12′ 30″W | 33° 26′ 25″ N | 1499 | 2018 | |||
| System | System | 8° 39′ 56″ W | 29° 37′ 04″ N | 1625.5 | 2018 | ||||
| Ifrane | Timahdite | 5° 02′ 21″ W | 33° 14′ 21″ N | 1961.5 | 2019 | ||||
| Ifrane | Ain Aghbal | 5° 15′ 33″ W | 33° 26′ 30″ N | 1170 | 2018 | ||||
| Ifrane | Tigrigra | 5° 18′ 43″ W | 33° 24′ 33″ N | 1121 | 2019 | ||||
| Ifrane | Bensmim | 5° 10′ 33″ W | 33° 30′ 29″ N | 1579 | 2019 | ||||
The taxonomic classification of the genus Thymus.
| Kingdom | Plantae |
| Division | Magnoliophyta |
| Class | Magnoliopsida |
| Order | Lamiales |
| Family | |
| Genus |
Fig. 1Morphological aspect of the studied thyme species, A:Thymus vulgaris; Thymus satureioides and C:Thymus zygis.
List of Bacterial Strains Tested with their references.
| 5994 | 7DT2404 | ||
| 4IH2510 | 3DT1938 | ||
| 2DT2220 | 2DT2057 | ||
| 7DT2108 | 07CQ164 | ||
| 3EU9286 | 02EV317 | ||
| 7DT1887 | 3DT2151 | ||
| 2EU9285 | 3DT1823 | ||
| 2CQ9355 | 2DS5461 | ||
| 13EU7181 | 2DT2138 | ||
| 5442 | |||
| 2DT2140 | |||
| 375BR6 | |||
| 2CG5132 | |||
| 7DS1513 | |||
| ATCC27729 |
List of fungal Strains Tested with their references.
| Ca | ||
| Cky | ||
| Ckr | ||
| Cpa | ||
| Ct | ||
| Cd | ||
| Sacc | ||
| AspN |
Quality control of plant matter (MC, pH and Ash).
| 14.48 | 5.17 | 7.62 | |
| 14.27 | 5.69 | 7.46 | |
| 18.88 | 5.46 | 8.40 | |
| 17.43 | 5.21 | 6.39 | |
| 14.80 | 5.26 | 7.34 | |
| 14.86 | 5.28 | 6.78 | |
| 15.00 | 5.30 | 14.31 |
Concentration of heavy metals (mg/l) (ICP) and FAO/WHO Maximum Limit (2009).
| Arsenic (As) | Cadmium (Cd) | Chrome (Cr) | Iron (Fe) | Lead (Pb) | Antimony (Sb) | Titanium (Ti) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0,1272 | 0,0442 | 0,0691 | 0,6034 | 0,1059 | 0,1225 | 0,0742 | |
| 0,004 | 0,001 | 0,0200 | 4,489 | 0,0878 | 0,0050 | 0,0300 | |
| 0,1288 | 0,0438 | 0,0657 | 0,7219 | 0,0998 | 0,1195 | 0,0722 | |
| 0.0025 | 0.0016 | < =0.001 | < =0.001 | < =0.001 | < =0.001 | < =0.001 | |
| Maximum limit | 1 | 0,3 | 2 | 20 | 3 | 1 | – |
Yields (ml/100 g dry matter) and density of essential oils of the seven thyme samples.
| 3,77 ± 0,19 | 0,953 | |
| TSAZ | 1,4 ± 0,07 | 1,113 |
| 0,7 ± 0,03 | 1,033 | |
| 2,68 ± 0,13 | 0,863 | |
| 3,27 ± 0,16 | 0,943 | |
| 3,32 ± 0,17 | 1,013 | |
| 4,12 ± 0,21 | 0,883 |
Fig. 2Chromatographic profiles of the studied essential oils, (1- TVHA: Thymus vulgaris from El Hammam; 2 & 3- TSAZ and TSTA: Thymus satureioides from Azrou and Tata; 4, 5, 6 & 7- TZTIM, TZAA, TZTIG and TZBE: Thymus zygis of Timahdite, Ain Aghbal, Tigrigra and Bensmim).
Chemical profiles of the essential oils of the studied thymes.
| 926 | Tricyclene | – | 0,2 | 0,2 | – | – | – | – |
| 979 | β-Pinene | 0,1 | 0,4 | 0,2 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| 1002 | α-Phellandrene | 0,2 | – | – | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| 1011 | δ-3-Carene | – | – | – | 0,1 | 0,1 | – | – |
| 1029 | Limonene | 0,2 | 0,3 | 0,1 | 0,2 | 0,2 | 0,2 | 0,2 |
| 1029 | β-Phellandrene | 0,2 | – | – | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | – |
| 1031 | 1,8-Cineole | – | 0,1 | – | – | – | – | 0,2 |
| 1050 | (E)-β-Ocimene | 0,2 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1070 | 0,1 | – | – | 0,4 | 0,4 | – | 0,1 | |
| 1072 | – | – | 0,2 | – | – | 0,1 | – | |
| 1085 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0,1 | |
| 1086 | – | – | – | 0,1 | – | – | – | |
| 1088 | Terpinolene | 0,1 | 0,1 | – | 0,1 | 0,1 | – | 0,1 |
| 1098 | – | – | – | 0,1 | – | – | – | |
| 1139 | – | – | 0,2 | – | – | – | – | |
| 1146 | Camphor | – | 0,2 | 0,7 | – | – | – | – |
| 1233 | Pulegone | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0,3 |
| 1235 | Thymol, methyl ether | – | – | – | 0,1 | 0,2 | – | – |
| 1239 | Isobornyl formate | – | 0,3 | 0,7 | – | – | – | – |
| 1270 | (E)-Cinnamaldehyde | – | – | – | – | 0,2 | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | |||||
| 1343 | Piperitenone | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0,1 |
| 1368 | Piperitenone oxide | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0,1 |
| 1372 | Carvacrol acetate | 0,1 | – | – | – | 0,1 | 0,1 | – |
| 1376 | α-Copaene | – | 0,2 | 0,2 | – | – | – | – |
| 1441 | Aromadendrene | 0,4 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1454 | α-Humulene | 0,2 | 0,2 | – | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | – |
| 1466 | 9-epi-(E)-Caryophyllene | – | – | 0,2 | – | – | – | – |
| 1479 | γ-Muurolene | – | 0,1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1496 | Viridiflorene | 0,3 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1513 | γ-Cadinene | 0,3 | 0,5 | 0,6 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| 1523 | δ-Cadinene | 0,3 | 0,6 | 0,4 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| 1555 | Thymohydro quinone | – | – | – | 0,2 | 0,1 | – | 0,1 |
| 1578 | Spathulenol | 0,1 | – | 0,4 | 0,1 | 0,1 | – | 0,1 |
| 1607 | β-Oplopenone | – | – | 0,2 | – | – | – | – |
| 1640 | Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5α-ol | – | 0,2 | 0,6 | – | – | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | |||||
| 1640 | epi-α-Cadinol | – | 0,8 | 0,9 | – | 0,1 | – | – |
| – | – | – | – | |||||
| 1686 | Germacra-4(15),5,10(14)-trien-1-α-ol | – | 0,5 | 0,7 | – | – | – | 0,2 |
| 21,5 | 13,8 | 10,6 | 30,3 | 33,1 | 25,1 | 23,4 | ||
| 73,6 | 74,8 | 76,6 | 65,2 | 62,8 | 66,1 | 73,1 | ||
| 3,6 | 6,0 | 4,4 | 2,3 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 1,4 | ||
| 0,1 | 4,1 | 6,7 | 0,9 | 0,9 | 1,2 | 1,4 | ||
Fig. 3Distribution of chemical families identified in the essential oils of the thymes studied (%).
Fig. 4Phylogenetic tree of the studied thyme EO.
Fig. 5Graphical approach of the principal component analysis according to the plan (F1xF2) of the essential oils of thymes from the different regions studied.
MIC and MBC values (μg/ml) of the essential oils studied.
| 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 5000 | ||
| 300 | 600 | 2500 | 2500 | > 5000 | > 5000 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 1200 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 1200 | ||
| 300 | 600 | 300 | 600 | > 5000 | > 5000 | > 5000 | > 5000 | > 5000 | > 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | ||
| 150 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 600 | 150 | 300 | 300 | 300 | ||
| 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 2500 | 2500 | 1200 | 2500 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 2500 | 1200 | 2500 | ||
| 2500 | 2500 | > 5000 | > 5000 | 600 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 5000 | 5000 | 600 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | ||
| 2500 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 2500 | 2500 | 1200 | 2500 | 1200 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 5000 | 5000 | ||
| 300 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 75 | 150 | 300 | 600 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 75 | 150 | ||
| 1200 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 1200 | 1200 | 600 | 1200 | 5000 | 5000 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | ||
| 300 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 2500 | 5000 | 300 | 600 | 150 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 150 | 300 | ||
| 18,75 | 37,5 | 37,5 | 75 | 150 | 300 | 18,75 | 37,5 | 75 | 150 | 75 | 150 | 20 | 37,5 | ||
| 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 300 | 600 | 300 | 600 | 75 | 150 | 600 | 600 | ||
| 2500 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | ||
| 18,75 | 37,5 | 150 | 150 | 75 | 150 | 18,75 | 37,5 | 150 | 150 | 75 | 150 | 150 | 300 | ||
| 150 | 300 | 1200 | 2500 | 1200 | 1200 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 150 | 300 | 300 | 300 | ||
| 150 | 300 | 1200 | 1200 | 2500 | 5000 | 300 | 300 | 1200 | 1200 | 600 | 1200 | 600 | 600 | ||
| 150 | 300 | 600 | 1200 | 37,5 | 75 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 37,5 | 75 | 150 | 150 | ||
| 300 | 300 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 5000 | 600 | 1200 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | ||
| 300 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 2500 | 150 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 300 | ||
| 300 | 300 | 1200 | 1200 | 600 | 1200 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 600 | 300 | 600 | ||
| 600 | 1200 | 300 | 600 | 2500 | 2500 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | ||
| 300 | 600 | 1200 | 1200 | 5000 | 5000 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 2500 | 5000 | ||
| 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 2500 | 1200 | 1200 | 150 | 300 | ||
| 75 | 150 | 75 | 150 | 300 | 300 | 150 | 300 | 75 | 150 | 75 | 150 | 37,5 | 75 | ||
MIC (μg/ml) of antibiotics evaluated by BD Phoenix for selected species.
| 5994 | 2 | > 8 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 4IH2510 | < 0.5 | 2 | < 10 | ||||
| 2DT2220 | 2 | > 8 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 7DT2108 | < =250 | < 0.5 | 0,03 | ||||
| 3EU9286 | > 1000 | < 0.5 | 0,13 | ||||
| 7DT1887 | < =250 | > 4 | 0,06 | ||||
| 2EU9285 | < =250 | < 0.5 | 0,06 | ||||
| 2CQ9355 | < =500 | 1 | < =0.5/9.5 | ||||
| 13EU7181 | < =500 | > 4 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 7DT2404 | < =1 | < =2/2 | < =1/19 | ||||
| 3DT1938 | 2 | 8/2 | < =1/19 | ||||
| 2DT2057 | 2 | > 8/2 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 07CQ164 | < =1 | 8/2 | < =1/19 | ||||
| 02EV317 | > 4 | > 8/2 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 3DT2151 | < 1 | > 8/2 | < 20 | ||||
| 3DT1823 | < =1 | < =2/2 | < =1/19 | ||||
| 2DS5461 | 2 | < =2/2 | > 1/19 | ||||
| 2DT2138 | 2 | > 8/2 | 4/76 | ||||
| 5442 | 4 | > 8/2 | 4/76 | ||||
| 2DT2140 | > 4 | > 8/2 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 375BR6 | 4 | > 8/2 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 2CG5132 | > 4 | 8/2 | > 4/76 | ||||
| 7DS1513 | > 4 | 8/2 | > 4/76 | ||||
| ATCC27729 | < =1 | 8/2 | 2/38 | ||||
Results of MIC and MFC (μg/ml) of the essential oils studied and terbinafin.
| Ca | 600 | 600 | 2500 | 5000 | 2500 | 2500 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 300 | 1200 | 1200 | 150 | 300 | 12,500 | |
| Cky | 1200 | 1200 | 5000 | 5000 | 2500 | 2500 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 2500 | 1200 | 2500 | 1200 | 2500 | 25,000 | |
| Ckr | 2500 | 5000 | 5000 | 5000 | 1200 | 1200 | 2500 | 5000 | 1200 | 1200 | > 5000 | > 5000 | 2500 | 2500 | 50,000 | |
| Cpa | 150 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 1200 | 600 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 150 | 300 | 150 | 300 | 6,250 | |
| Ct | 300 | 300 | 1200 | 1200 | 5000 | 5000 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 1200 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 12,500 | |
| Cd | 600 | 1200 | 18,75 | 37,5 | 5000 | 5000 | 600 | 600 | 300 | 300 | 600 | 1200 | 1200 | 1200 | 3,125 | |
| AspN | 37,5 | 70 | 300 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 37,5 | 70 | 37,5 | 70 | 3,125 | |
| Sacc | 70 | 150 | 600 | 1200 | 2500 | 2500 | 70 | 150 | 70 | 150 | 600 | 1200 | 300 | 300 | 3,125 | |
Fig. 6Correlation of the chemical composition of essential oils with their antimicrobial properties measured as inhibition capacity (MIC) (Two-Dimensional Clustered Heatmaps).