| Literature DB >> 36163635 |
Cyril Soliman1, Dandan Tu1, Samuel Mabbott1,2, Gerard Coté1,2, Kristen Maitland1,2.
Abstract
SignificancePoint-of-care (POC) platforms utilizing optical biosensing strategies can achieve on-site detection of biomarkers to improve the quality of care for patients in low-resource settings.AimWe aimed to develop a portable, multi-modal spectroscopic platform capable of performing Raman and fluorescence measurements from a single sample site.ApproachWe designed the spectroscopic platform in OpticStudio using commercial optical components and built the system on a portable optical breadboard. Two excitation and collection arms were utilized to detect the two optical signals. The multi-modal functionality was validated using ratiometric Raman/fluorescence samples, and the potential utility was demonstrated using a model bioassay for cardiac troponin I.ResultsThe designed spectroscopic platform achieved a spectral resolution of 0.67 ± 0.2 nm across the Raman detection range (660 to 770 nm). The ratiometric Raman/fluorescence samples demonstrated no crosstalk between the two detector arms across a gradient of high molar concentrations. Testing of the model bioassay response showed that the integrated approach improved the linearity of the calibration curve from (R2 = 0.977) for the Raman only and (R2 = 0.972) for the fluorescence only to (R2 = 0.988) for the multi-modal approach.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate the potential impact of a multi-modal POC spectroscopic platform to improve the sensitivity and robustness necessary for biomarker detection.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; fluorescence; multi-modal; point-of-care; spectroscopic platform; surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36163635 PMCID: PMC9510839 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.9.095006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.758
Fig. 1(a) Schematic of multi-modal optical system layout and (b) assembled optical system on a portable optical breadboard (). (c) Ray trace of the spectrometer and front optics portion of the optical system.
Fig. 2Schematic illustration of the sensing probes and assay response. (a) Denotes the nanoprobes in the absence of cTnI, resulting in a high fluorescence signal and low SERS signal due to the distance between the AuNPs surface and the dual RRM/fluorophore (Cy3). (b) Denotes the probes in the presence of cTnI, resulting in the separation of the hybridized aptamers due to the high binding affinity of the cTnI aptamer to its target. The AuNP-bound complementary aptamer folds to bring the Cy3 molecule closer to the AuNP surface resulting in a decrease in fluorescence signal due to quenching, and an increase in the SERS signal, due to electromagnetic enhancement. (Created with BioRender; see Ref. 53.)
Fig. 3Calibration of the detector area using an Argon emission lamp to correlate pixel location to wavelength. (a) Argon emission spectra were collected from fiber coupling into the commercial USB4000 spectrometer. (b) Argon emission spectra were collected from the developed optical system.
Fig. 4SERS and fluorescence plots from ratiometric RRM/fluorophore solutions compared across the gold standard instruments and the developed optical system. (a) SERS spectra obtained using the ID Raman Mini 2.0 spectrometer (5 s acquisition), and (b) shows fluorescence spectra obtained using the benchtop Tecan plate reader. (c) SERS plot (15 s acquisition time) and (d) shows fluorescence spectra obtained using a multi-modal spectroscopic platform. The fluorescence plot in (d) was obtained by fiber coupling an external spectrometer to the fluorescence collection arm of the developed system to ensure no crosstalk between the collection arms. The concentration ratios denoted in the legends refer to the micromolar concentration of the RRM: the micromolar concentration of the fluorophore in each sample. [Note: the Raman plots of (a) and (c) were purposefully offset for clarity of presentation and they do not actually have different intensity floors.]
Fig. 5(a) Fluorescence image acquired using the Raspberry PI camera with the yellow box denoting the plotted region of interest. (b) Fluorescence intensity plot for ratiometric SERS/fluorescence solutions collected using the Raspberry PI Camera. The concentration ratios indicated in the legend refer to the micromolar concentration of the RRM: the micromolar concentration of the fluorophore in each sample. (c) SERS peak intensity at across the ratiometric SERS/fluorescence solutions shows an increase in the intensity as the concentration of 4-MBA increases. (d) The average fluorescence intensity across the entire field of view for ratiometric SERS/fluorescence solutions shows a decrease in fluorescence intensity as the fluorescein concentration decreases. The concentration ratios on the -axis refer to the micromolar concentration of the RRM: the micromolar concentration of the fluorophore in each sample.
Fig. 6Multi-modal bioassay response to spiked cTnI samples using the multi-modal spectroscopic platform. (a) SERS intensity plot (30 s acquisition) with the * denoting the peak of interest plotted in (b). (b) Linear response of the aptasensor collected from the Raman peak at . (c) The average fluorescence intensity plot measured across the region of interest corresponds to the illuminated microcuvette area. (d) Linear response of average fluorescence intensity measured as the average across the entire field of view. (e) Linear response of multi-modal approach obtained by dividing the Raman peak intensity at by the average fluorescence intensity. Error bars are (). [Note: the Raman plots of (a) were purposefully offset for clarity of presentation and they do not actually have different intensity floors.]