| Literature DB >> 33791276 |
Chongning Li1,2,3, Jiao Li1,2,3, Aihui Liang1,2,3, Guiqing Wen1,2,3, Zhiliang Jiang1,2,3.
Abstract
Sensitive and selective methods for the determination of urea in samples such as dairy products are important for quality control and health applications. Using ammonium ferric citrate as a precursor, Fe/N-codoped carbon dots (CDFeN) were prepared by a hydrothermal procedure and characterized in detail. CDFeN strongly catalyzes the oxidation of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) by H2O2 to turn on an indicator molecular reaction, forming an oxidized tetramethylbenzidine (TMBox) probe with surface-enhanced Raman scattering, resonance Rayleigh scattering, and fluorescence (SERS, RRS, and FL) signals at 1,598 cm-1, 370 nm, and 405 nm, respectively. The urea aptamer (Apt) can turn off the indicator reaction to reduce the tri-signals, and the addition of urea turns on the indicator reaction to linearly enhance the SERS/RRS/FL intensity. Thus, a novel Apt turn-on tri-mode method was developed for the assay determination of ultra-trace urea with high sensitivity, good selectivity, and accuracy. Trace adenosine triphosphate and estradiol can also be determined by the Apt-CDFeN catalytic analytical platform.Entities:
Keywords: Fe/N-doped carbon dots; aptamer; catalysis amplification; fluorescence; resonance Rayleigh scattering; surface-enhanced Raman scattering
Year: 2021 PMID: 33791276 PMCID: PMC8005568 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.613083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
FIGURE 1Schematic of SERS/RRS/FL tri-mode method to detect ultra-trace urea coupling Apturea with CDFeN catalysis.
FIGURE 2SERS spectra of CD-H2O2-TMB-Apt-AgNP analysis system. A/B compared the catalytic effects between CDFe and CDFeN in the urea analysis system. (A): CDFe-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea-AgNPs system, a: 0.04 μg/ml CDFe+5.0 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+0.51 mmol/L PH = 4.07 Tris-HCl+10 nmol/L Apt+ Urea+0.08 mmol/L AgNPs; b: a+3.33 nmol/L Urea; c: a+6.66 nmol/L Urea; d: a+9.99 nmol/L Urea; e: a+13.32 nmol/L Urea; f: a+16.65 nmol/L Urea. (B): CDFeN-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea-AgNPs system, a: 0.04 μg/ml CDFeN+ 5.0 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.51 mmol/L PH = 4.07 Tris-HCl+10 nmol/L Apt+ Urea+0.08 mmol/L AgNPs; b: a+3.33 nmol/L Urea; c: a+6.66 nmol/L Urea; d: a+9.99 nmol/L Urea; e: a+13.32 nmol/L Urea; f: a+16.65 nmol/L Urea.
FIGURE 3FL spectra of CD-H2O2-TMB analysis system. Without H2O2-TMB probe, A/B compared the fluorescence between CDFe and CDFeN in the urea analysis system. (A): CDFe-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea system. a: 0.04 μg/ml CDFe+ 6.7 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.84 mmol/L PH = 4.4 Tris-HCl+16.65 nmol/L Apt; b: a+3.33 nmol/L Urea; c: a+6.66 nmol/L Urea; d: a+9.99 nmol/L Urea; e: a+13.32 nmol/L Urea; f: a+16.65 nmol/L Urea; g: a+20 nmol/L Urea; (B): CDFeN-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea system, a: 0.04 μg/ml CDFeN+6.7 μmol/L H2O2+0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.84 mmol/L PH = 4.4 Tris-HCl+16.65 nmol/L Apt; b: a+3.33 nmol/L Urea; c: a+6.66 nmol/L Urea; d: a+9.99 nmol/L Urea; e: a+13.32 nmol/L Urea; f: a+16.65 nmol/L Urea; g: a+20 nmol/L Urea.
FIGURE 4RRS spectra of CD-Tris-HCl-Apt analysis system. A/B compared the RRS analysis system of urea using CDFe and CDFeN, respectively. (A): CDFe-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea-AgNPs system, a: 0.04 μg/ml CDFe + 6.7 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.84 mmol/L PH = 4.4 Tris-HCl+16.65 nmol/L Apt+0.08 mmol/L AgNPs; b: a+2.5 nmol/L Urea; c: a+5 nmol/L Urea; d: a+7.5 nmol/L Urea; e: a+8.5 nmol/L Urea; f: a+12.5 nmol/L Urea. (B): CDFeN-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea-AgNPs system, a:0.04 μg/ml CDFeN + 6.7 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.84 mmol/L PH = 4.4 Tris-HCl+16.65 nmol/L Apt+0.08 mmol/L AgNPs; b: a+2.5 nmol/L Urea; c: a+5 nmol/L Urea; d: a+6 nmol/L Urea; e: a+7.5 nmol/L Urea; f: a+10 nmol/L Urea; g: a+12.5 nmol/L Urea.
FIGURE 5SEM and energy spectra images of analysis system. (A): SEM of CDFe; (B): SEM of CDFeN; (C): energy spectrum of CDFe; (D): energy spectrum of CDFeN; (E): Analysis system without urea, 0.08 μg/ml CDFeN+ 5.0 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.51 mmol/L pH 4.07 Tris-HCl+10 nmol/L Apt+0.08 mmol/L AgNPs; (F): Analysis system with urea. E+12.5 nmol/L Urea.
FIGURE 6Particle size distribution of CDFeN-H2O2-TMB-Tris-HCl-Apt-Urea-AgNPs system. a: 0.08 μg/ml CDFeN+ 5.0 μmol/L H2O2+ 0.03 mmol/L TMB+ 0.51 mmol/L Tris-HCl (PH = 4.07)+10 nmol/L Apt+ Urea+0.08 mmol/LAgNPs; b: a+5.0 nmol/L Urea; c: a+12.5 nmol/L Urea.
The tri-mode analytical platform for assay of urea.
| System | Methods | LR (nmol/L) | Regression equation | Coefficient | DL (nmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDFe-Urea | FL | 3.33–20 | ΔF405 nm = 27.5C + 28.5 | 0.9856 | 1.4 |
| SERS | 3.33–16.65 |
| 0.9946 | 1.3 | |
| RRS | 2.5–12.5 | ΔI370 nm = 17.6C−2.9 | 0.9939 | 1.6 | |
| CDFeN-Urea | FL | 3.33–20 | ΔF405 nm = 22.3C + 15.7 | 0.9880 | 1.0 |
| SERS | 1.1–16.65 |
| 0.9895 | 0.06 | |
| RRS | 2.5–12.5 | ΔI370 nm = 21.0C−6.5 | 0.9909 | 1.71 |
Comparison of reported Urea analysis methods.
| Method | Analysis principle | Linear range | Detection limit | Analysis characteristics | RSD (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | The urea-specific DNA aptamer was isolated by an exponential enrichment method. In terms of inherent fluorescence differences and color changes, the aptamer sensor used unmodified gold nanoparticles (AuNP) to transduce the signal of aptamer-urea binding, thereby showed high selectivity to urea. | 20–150 mM | 20 mM | Simple operation and low sensitivity | — | 36 |
| Electrochemical | A mixture of carbon nanotubes and platinum nanoparticle-reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was used to surface modify the glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The urea aptamer was then immobilized on the nanocomposite by covalent bonding. Thus, aptamers with high affinity and selectivity for urea were used to quantify urea. | 0.0–0.1 nM, 1.0–150 nM | 1.9 pM | Complex operation and expensive equipment | 7.9% | 37 |
| Electrochemical | Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) also contained DNA aptamers on gold nanoparticles containing carbon nanotube networks (AuNP/CNT). The material was placed on a glass-carbon electrode (GCE), and GCE showed double recognition ability after removing urea from the MIP cavity. After the modified electrode was exposed to urea, the interface charge transfer of the redox probe hexacyanoferrate was measured under certain conditions. The change of the charge transfer resistance depended on the urea concentration, so the urea can be detected with high specificity. | 0.005–0.1 nM, 1–500 nM | 900 fM | Complex operation and high sensitivity | 5.5% | 38 |
| Electrochemical | The primary amine was functionalized GO by a one-pot solvothermal method using ethylene glycol as the solvent and ammonia as the nitrogen precursor. Based on the signal amplification of carbon nanotubes/amine-functionalized GO as a sensing platform, and Apt as a probe, the label-free electrochemical analysis of urea was performed. | 1–30 nM, 100–2000 nM | 370 pM | Complex operation and high sensitivity | 6.7–11.5% | 39 |
| SERS | The substrate made from Au/Cu hybrid nanostructure arrays was used to detect urea. Adjusting the gap size between adjacent nanorods to a sub-10 nm range produced high-density hot spots, which enables the substrate to detect urea signals at low concentrations. | — | 1 mM | Simple operation and low sensitivity | 9.5% | 34 |
| SERS-FL | Apt mediated the CDFeN catalyzed H2O2 oxidation of TMB to form trifunctional probes of TMBox. The FL/SERS/Abs signals had a linear relationship with the concentration of Urea. | Flu:3.33–13.32 nmol/L; SERS:3.33–16.65 nnmol/L | 1.12 nmol/L,1 nmol/L | Simple operation and high sensitivity | 1.45–5.32% | This method |