| Literature DB >> 36160546 |
Tong Liu1, Zhengdong Yu1.
Abstract
With the development of mobile Internet technology, firms need to complete the entire process of consumer targeting, ad content generation, and ad display in a very short time window. Therefore, computational advertising, such as native ads on social media platforms, has become the mainstream of online advertising with its automation and personalization features. However, computational advertising faces some problems when using artificial intelligence technology to generate content. First, the images should have a significant enough impact on consumers and be easy to adjust to save computational power at the same time; second, the iteration of the computational advertising system relies on consumer behaviors or advertising effectiveness, and firms need to learn the relationship between ad design and consumer behaviors. Under the above two problems, this paper selects visual distance as the main variable, and images can be adjusted by cropping to save computational power. This paper incorporates image design and ad effectiveness metrics into the construal level theory framework, under which the effectiveness metrics can be quickly determined. Following previous studies, we use click-through rate (CTR) to represent the early stage of the sales funnel and a higher construal level and CVR (conversion rate) to represent the later stage of the sales funnel and a lower construal level. Therefore, visually distant images bring distant psychological distance or higher construal level, which can get higher CTR; visually proximate images bring near psychological distance or lower construal level, which can bring higher CVR. These findings suggest that firms can improve the efficiency of their advertising systems and gain more revenue by understanding consumer psychological states.Entities:
Keywords: CTR; CVR; computational advertising; construal level theory; visual distance
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160546 PMCID: PMC9496644 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.994573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Study comparison with relevant literature.
| Authors (Year) | Independent variable | Dependent variable | Theory | Data source | Key findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimension | Coding method | Evaluation | Action | ||||
|
| Socially distance | Human | Attitudes toward advertising, intentions to action | Regulatory focus | Lab Experiments | Results indicate that when asked to make judgments for distant entities, individuals are more persuaded by a promotion-focused frame in terms of ad attitudes, whereas there are no differential framing effects on judgments associated with proximal entities. | |
|
| Image content and characteristics, Image-Text fit | Human and automatic | Attention(Inferred) and Engagement(Measured) | N.A | Field Data | The authors find a significant and robust positive mere presence effect of image content on user engagement in both product categories on Twitter. High-quality and professionally shot pictures consistently lead to higher engagement on both platforms for both product categories. | |
|
| Physical distance from the verbal description | Human | Beliefs | Mental image | Lab Experiments | Consumers’ physical distance from the verbal description of an event or a product can influence their beliefs in its implications. These and other effects are mediated by the vividness of the mental image. | |
|
| Image proximity, product category | Human | Attitudes toward the ad, attitudes toward the product, purchase intentions | Construal level theory | Lab Experiments | Utilitarian products will cause low-level construal to match more strongly with rational appeals; hedonic products will cause high-level construal to match more strongly with emotional appeals. | |
|
| Congruency of color and message type | Human | Attitude toward the ad, attitude toward the restaurant, purchase intention, willingness to pay | Construal level theory | Lab Experiments | Taste-focused advertising messages combined with color imagery and health-focused advertising messages combined with black-and-white (BW) imagery can effectively boost consumer responses, including attitude toward the ad, attitude toward the restaurant, purchase intention, and willingness to pay (WTP). | |
|
| Feature complexity, design complexity | Human | attention to the brand, attention to the advertisement, attitude toward the ad | Visual complexity theory | Lab experiments | Feature complexity hurts attention to the brand and attitude toward the ad, whereas design complexity helps attention to both the pictorial and the ad as a whole, its comprehensibility, and attitude toward the ad. | |
|
| Sponsor–team visual congruence | Human | Brand recall, brand attitude, visit intentions, and purchase intentions | Attribution theory | Field data | Two experiments in the contexts of product packaging and online advertising provide converging evidence of the positive effects of created visual congruence on | |
|
| Consistency of visual and verbal elements | Human | Ad attitude, attractiveness, purchase intention | Construal level theory | Lab experiments | Advertising effectiveness increases when visual advertising elements (e.g., view height) and verbal advertising elements (e.g., time effectiveness) induce the same construal level. | |
| Current study | Visual proximity in images | Human and automatic | CTR | CVR | Construal level theory | Field data | The results show that visually distant images can be more attractive, that is, higher CTR; visually proximate images can be more persuasive, that is, higher CVR. |
Statistics of the dataset.
| Min | Max | Mean | Std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Money | 0.01 | 13733.86 | 110.22 | 443.31 |
| Impressions | 1 | 1,181,816 | 9051.34 | 36042.30 |
| Clicks | 0 | 31,740 | 108.69 | 657.11 |
| Conversions | 0 | 292 | 1.38 | 8.13 |
| CTR | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.010 | 0.02 |
| CVR | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.009 | 0.04 |
Figure 1CTR comparison.
Figure 2CVR comparison.
Correlations of the variables.
| CTR | CVR | Money | Impressions | Image | Format | Text | Emotion | Days | Holiday | Texture | Color | Bright | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTR | 1 | ||||||||||||
| CVR | −0.045** | 1 | |||||||||||
| Money | 0.048** | 0.036** | 1 | ||||||||||
| Impressions | 0.047** | 0.019 | 0.948** | 1 | * | ||||||||
| Image | 0.059** | −0.039** | −0.058** | −0.037** | 1 | ||||||||
| Format | 0.108** | −0.090** | −0.149** | −0.152** | −0.008 | 1 | |||||||
| Text | 0.058** | −0.037** | 0.066** | 0.058** | −0.118** | −0.011 | 1 | ||||||
| Emotion | −0.113** | 0.008 | −0.138** | −0.114** | 0.107** | 0.015 | −0.166** | 1 | |||||
| Days | 0.093** | −0.092** | −0.231** | −0.251** | −0.007 | 0.390** | 0.093** | −0.057** | 1 | ||||
| Holiday | −0.049** | −0.012 | −0.024* | −0.024* | 0.008 | 0.013 | 0.009 | −0.004 | 0.064** | 1 | |||
| Texture | −0.044** | 0.043** | −0.001 | −0.011 | 0.066** | −0.257** | −0.015 | −0.011 | −0.128** | 0.000 | 1 | ||
| Color | −0.088** | −0.001 | 0.006 | 0.010 | −0.242** | 0.000 | 0.105** | −0.016 | −0.051** | −0.003 | 0.023* | 1 | |
| Bright | 0.022* | −0.054** | −0.006 | −0.019 | 0.051** | 0.287** | 0.262** | −0.061** | 0.107** | 0.006 | −0.110** | 0.251** | 1 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3Examples of visually distant and proximate images.
Figure 4Comparison of RGB and HSV decomposition.
Figure 5Example of extracting image texture.
Constructs and measures.
| Variable’s name (name in the equation) | Variable description |
|---|---|
|
| |
| CTR | CTR = clicks/exposures |
| CVR | CVR = conversions/clicks |
| Independent variables | |
| Image | Machine learning mixed with manual coding, the visually proximate image is recorded as 0; the visually distant image is recorded as 1. |
| Format | The design of the ad, banner ad as 0; native ad as 1. |
| Text | Machine learning mixed with manual coding, the objective text is recorded as 0, and the subjective text is recorded as 1 |
|
| |
| Emotion | The emotion of the ad text is calculated by Baidu PaddlePaddle. |
| Days | The number of days since this ad is exposed. |
| Workdays | The day is recorded as 0 when it is a holiday; the day is recorded as 1 when it is a workday. |
| Texture | Extracted by OpenCV, and PCA model was used to calculate the first five feature values and then average them for the final number. |
| Color | The color richness of images, continuous variable, and the arithmetic average of the color of pictures in RGB space. |
| Brightness | Illumination elements in an image, continuous variables, using Pillow to calculate the root mean square value of pixel value of each channel in HSV space. |
|
| |
| Continuity | 1, when the ad is launched on the following day; 0, when the ad is not launched on the following day. |
| Money | The money cost by this ad in this day. |
| Impressions | The impressions of this ad on this day |
Main effects results.
| OLS | Tobit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTR | CVR | CTR | CVR | |
| Images | 0.078 | −0.075 | 0.085 | −0.123 |
| Format | 0.052 | −0.437 | 0.012 | −2.411 |
| Text | 0.053 | −0.123 | 0.050 | −0.386 |
| Emotion | −0.211 | −0.057 | −0.236 | −0.397 |
| Holiday | −0.020 | 0.077 | −0.012 | 0.304 |
| Days | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.002 |
| Texture | −2.322 | −4.463 | −2.748 | −18.062 |
| Color | −0.003 | −0.001 | −0.004 | −0.001 |
| Brightness | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.001 |
| IMR | −0.665 | −3.883 | −1.162 | −18.002 |
p < 0.10.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
Interaction results.
| OLS | Tobit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTR | CVR | CTR | CVR | |
| Images | 0.033 | −0.077 | 0.028 | −0.091. |
| Format | 0.068 | −0.515 | 0.023 | −2.516 |
| Text | 0.033 | −0.137 | 0.025 | −0.386 |
| Images | 0.042 | 0.041 | 0.067 | −0.084 |
| Images*Text | 0.068 | −0.023 | 0.080 | −0.049 |
| Format*Text | −0.072 | 0.121 | −0.086 | 0.293 |
| Emotion | −0.202 | −0.073 | −0.225 | −0.414 |
| Holiday | −0.020 | 0.066 | −0.012 | 0.304 |
| Days | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.002 |
| Textual | −1.968 | −4.592 | −2.305 | −18.361 |
| Color | −0.003 | −0.001 | −0.003 | −0.001 |
| Brightness | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.001 |
| IMR | −0.668 | −3.482 | −1.163 | −17.983 |
p < 0.10.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.