Literature DB >> 36149614

Comment on the recent PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2021.

Maximilian Murtinger1, Maximilian Schuff2, Barbara Wirleitner2, Susanna Miglar3, Dietmar Spitzer3.   

Abstract

The worldwide demand of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is still growing. However, chromosomal mosaic results greatly challenge the clinical practice. The recently published PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos is the third PGDIS position statement on how to deal with embryos diagnosed as chromosomal mosaics (CM) and, one of many attempts of different societies and working groups to provide a guideline for clinicians, laboratories, clinics, and genetic counselors. But still, as in previous statements, many issues remained unresolved. Moreover, from our point of view, the question how to deal with embryos diagnosed as CM, consisting of two or more karyological cell lines cannot be separated from all the other aspects of PGT-A including its accuracy. The paucity of clearcut indications for PGT-A and evidence of benefit as well as an overall cost-benefit assessment is given below.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Evidence-based medicine; PGT-A; Trophectoderm biopsy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36149614     DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02620-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  47 in total

Review 1.  PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2019.

Authors:  D S Cram; D Leigh; A Handyside; L Rechitsky; K Xu; G Harton; J Grifo; C Rubio; E Fragouli; S Kahraman; E Forman; M Katz-Jaffe; H Tempest; A Thornhill; C Strom; T Escudero; J Qiao; S Munne; J L Simpson; A Kuliev
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  What are the cost considerations for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy?

Authors:  Randal D Robinson; Sheena Rippentrop; Jessica E McLaughlin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo selection.

Authors:  Santiago Munné
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 4.  The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.

Authors:  Edgardo Somigliana; Andrea Busnelli; Alessio Paffoni; Paola Vigano; Alessandra Riccaboni; Carmen Rubio; Antonio Capalbo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Gayathree Murugappan; Mika S Ohno; Ruth B Lathi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  PGDIS position statement on the transfer of mosaic embryos 2021.

Authors:  D Leigh; D S Cram; S Rechitsky; A Handyside; D Wells; S Munne; S Kahraman; J Grifo; M Katz-Jaffe; C Rubio; M Viotti; E Forman; K Xu; T Gordon; S Madjunkova; J Qiao; Z-J Chen; G Harton; L Gianaroli; C Simon; R Scott; J L Simpson; A Kuliev
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 4.567

8.  Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; J Cieslak; M Freidine; V Ivakhnenko; G Wolf; L Kovalinskaya; M White; A Lifchez; B Kaplan; J Moise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The PGS/PGT-A controversy in IVF addressed as a formal conflict resolution analysis.

Authors:  Lyka Mochizuki; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Towards a better understanding of preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy: insights from a virtual trial for women under the age of 40 when transferring embryos one at a time.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.