Literature DB >> 8583011

Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization.

Y Verlinsky1, J Cieslak, M Freidine, V Ivakhnenko, G Wolf, L Kovalinskaya, M White, A Lifchez, B Kaplan, J Moise.   

Abstract

Chromosomal aneuploidies contribute considerably to the low pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The objective of this experimental work was to explore the possibility of detecting common aneuploidies in oocytes by polar body sampling. The study included 45 infertile patients of advanced maternal age participating in an IVF programme. The first polar body was removed prior to fertilization or both the first and second polar bodies were removed after fertilization and studied by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) using chromosome-specific probes for chromosomes X, 18 and/or 13/21. Of 155 oocytes with FISH results, 36 demonstrated chromosomal abnormalities. Of 119 oocytes predicted to be free from aneuploidy of chromosomes X, 18 and/or 13/21, 72 were normally fertilized, cleaved and transferred in 23 treatment cycles, which resulted in two healthy deliveries and three ongoing pregnancies confirmed to be unaffected by chorionic villous sampling. The method may appear useful for the detection of oocytes with common chromosomal aneuploidies in IVF patients of advanced maternal age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8583011     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  28 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?

Authors:  M Bahçe; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Noncontact, laser-mediated extraction of polar bodies for prefertilization genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  A Clement-Sengewald; T Buchholz; K Schütze; U Berg; E D Berg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The utility of embryo banking in order to increase the number of embryos available for preimplantation genetic screening in advanced maternal age patients.

Authors:  John J Orris; Tyl H Taylor; Janice W Gilchrist; Susan V Hallowell; Michael J Glassner; J David Wininger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease by embryo biopsy: an update of the world figures.

Authors:  J C Harper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Allele dropout in sequential PCR and FISH analysis of single cells (cell recycling).

Authors:  S Rechitsky; M Freidine; Y Verlinsky; C M Strom
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Current status of preimplantation diagnosis.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; S Munné; J L Simpson; A Kuliev; A Ao; P Ray; K Sermon; R Martin; C Strom; A Van Stairteghem; A Veiga; K Drury; S Williams; N Ginsberg; L Wilton
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Improving the fixation method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Authors:  K Xu; T Huang; T Liu; Z Shi; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Karen Sermon; Catherine Staessen; Inge Liebaers; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Thomas D'Hooghe; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; John Collins; Luca Gianaroli; Veerle Goossens; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Markus Montag; Sjoerd Repping; Andreas Schmutzler
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.