Literature DB >> 3614793

Starch preference in rats.

A Sclafani, J W Nissenbaum, M Vigorito.   

Abstract

Several experiments examined the preference of adult female rats for starch and starch-derived polysaccnarides using short- and long-term two-choice tests. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats displayed an immediate preference for powdered corn starch over powdered cellulose in 30-min/day tests. This supports the hypothesis that rats have starch (polysaccharide) taste receptors. The rats also preferred the starch powder to Polycose powder. This preference was unexpected since Polycose, being partially hydrolyzed corn starch, should be a more effective taste stimulus than corn starch. Experiment 2 revealed that nondeprived rats also preferred starch to Polycose in 30-min/day tests, but reversed their preference in 24-hr/day tests; the preference reversal was attributed to postingestive factors. Additional experiments demonstrated that rats preferred branched-chain starch (amylopectin) to unbranched starch (amylose) in both short- and long-term tests. Rats also preferred amylopectin to Polycose in short-term tests when the saccharides were in powder form, but preferred Polycose to amylopectin when the saccharides were in liquid or gel form. The preference for amylopectin powder was not due to the noncarbohydrate constituents (fatty acids, proteins, others) in the starch since rats also preferred chemically purified amylopectin to Polycose powder. Additional tests suggested that texture differences do not explain the rats' preference for starch powder over Polycose powder. Taken together, the results demonstrate that rats have a robust preference for starch but the orosensory determinants of this preference are not completely understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3614793     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80033-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  11 in total

1.  Altered taste sensitivity in obese, prediabetic OLETF rats lacking CCK-1 receptors.

Authors:  Andras Hajnal; Mihai Covasa; Nicholas T Bello
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Tiffany R Aleman; Hillary T Ellis; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Saccharin pre-exposure enhances appetitive flavor learning in pre-weanling rats.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Sean B Ogden; Alycia F Laboy; T L Davidson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 4.  Salivary Amylase: Digestion and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Catherine Peyrot des Gachons; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Opioid mediation of starch and sugar preference in the rat.

Authors:  Kristine B Bonacchi; Karen Ackroff; Khalid Touzani; Richard J Bodnar; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Taste perception of cyclic oligosaccharides: α, β, and γ cyclodextrins.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Ventral pallidal coding of a learned taste aversion.

Authors:  Christy A Itoga; Kent C Berridge; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Kristine B Bonacchi; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

10.  Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of alpha-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.