| Literature DB >> 36141680 |
Juan Manuel García-Ceberino1,2, Sebastián Feu1,3, María Gracia Gamero3, Santos Villafaina4,5.
Abstract
Creative strategies allow students to feel ownership of their learning, fostering interest and motivation towards sports and educational contexts. This study aimed to compare different psychological variables after applying creative and traditional sessions of recreational figure roller-skating. Twelve school-age female skaters (9.00 ± 1.09 years old) participated in this pilot study. They performed two sessions: (1) a creative session (where participants created their own choreography) and (2) a traditional session (where participants followed the choreography created by the sports professional). In the creative session, participants created their choreographies without instructions. The basic psychological needs scale, the measure of intentionality to be physically active (sports adherence) and the games and emotions scale were administered after each session. The creative intervention led to a higher satisfaction of the needs of perceived competence (p-value = 0.04; effect size = 0.59), social relationships (p-value = 0.03; effect size = 0.62) and adherence to figure roller-skating (p-value = 0.02; effect size = 0.69), compared to the traditional intervention in female skaters. Participants showed significantly more humor and less surprise in the creative session than in the traditional session. This greater satisfaction with perceived competence and social relationships could translate into greater adherence to sports.Entities:
Keywords: basic psychological need; creative intervention; emotion; skater; sports adherence
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36141680 PMCID: PMC9517361 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Characteristics of creative and traditional intervention.
| Session Aspects | Creative Intervention | Traditional Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| Choreography type | Choreographies created by the participants themselves | Choreography created by the sports professional |
| Skaters grouping | Sub-groups according to their interests and friendships | One group only (individual work) |
| Teaching style(s) [ | Socializer; cooperative | Traditional: modification of direct control |
| Role of the sports professional | Guides, encourages and fosters participants’ creativity, without control and discipline | Plans, explains and demonstrates the activity to be performed, exercising moderate control and discipline |
| Role of the skaters | Active: groups work independently, dictating their own rules and acquire a high cognitive participation grade | Passive: execute the activities according to the guidelines set by the sports professional |
Differences in psychological variables were analyzed according to the intervention type.
| Variable | Dimension | Intervention |
|
|
|
| Comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPNs | Autonomy | Traditional | 3.98 | 1.09 | −1.61 | 0.13 | 0.46 | |
| Creative | 4.47 | 0.58 | ||||||
| Competence | Traditional | 3.93 | 1.07 | −2.04 | 0.04 * | 0.59 | TI < CI | |
| Creative | 4.55 | 0.58 | ||||||
| Relationships | Traditional | 4.04 | 0.90 | −2.15 | 0.03 * | 0.62 | TI < CI | |
| Creative | 4.52 | 0.78 | ||||||
| MIFA | Traditional | 4.05 | 0.92 | −2.40 | 0.02 * | 0.69 | TI < CI | |
| Creative | 4.57 | 0.62 | ||||||
| Emotions | Positive | Traditional | 6.79 | 2.56 | −1.54 | 0.13 | 0.45 | |
| Creative | 8.08 | 1.74 | ||||||
| Negative | Traditional | 1.24 | 1.33 | −0.62 | 0.56 | 0.18 | ||
| Creative | 1.04 | 1.17 | ||||||
| Ambiguous | Traditional | 6.00 | 1.97 | −1.61 | 0.11 | 0.46 | ||
| Creative | 3.84 | 1.90 | ||||||
Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation; ES = effect size; BPNs = basic psychological needs; MIFA = measure of intentionality to be physically active; TI = traditional intervention; CI = creative intervention; * p-value < 0.05.
Differences in the type of emotion induced by the traditional and the creative session.
| Emotions | Traditional Intervention | Creative Intervention | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparison | |||
| Positive emotions | Joy | 8.70 | 1.95 | 9.60 | 1.26 | −1.54 | 0.14 | 0.44 | |
| Humor | 4.20 | 4.59 | 7.60 | 3.37 | −2.04 | 0.04 * | 0.59 | TI < CI | |
| Love | 5.50 | 4.88 | 5.30 | 4.99 | −0.273 | 0.78 | 0.08 | ||
| Happiness | 9.10 | 1.91 | 9.60 | 1.26 | −1.07 | 0.31 | 0.31 | ||
| Negative emotions | Fear | 0.60 | 1.35 | 0.50 | 0.97 | −0.36 | 0.74 | 0.10 | |
| Anger | 0.40 | 1.26 | 0.30 | 0.95 | −0.29 | 0.77 | 0.08 | ||
| Rejection | 1.60 | 3.20 | 0.80 | 2.20 | −0.62 | 0.55 | 0.18 | ||
| Sadness | 0.30 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.42 | −0.57 | 0.57 | 0.17 | ||
| Shame | 2.40 | 3.72 | 2.60 | 3.34 | −0.44 | 0.66 | 0.13 | ||
| Anxiety | 2.00 | 4.22 | 1.30 | 2.58 | −0.64 | 0.55 | 0.18 | ||
| Ambiguous emotions | Hope | 5.60 | 4.27 | 5.00 | 4.57 | −0.538 | 0.59 | 0.15 | |
| Compassion | 3.80 | 4.34 | 0.70 | 1.34 | −0.81 | 0.53 | 0.23 | ||
| Surprise | 8.60 | 1.90 | 5.70 | 3.80 | −2.55 | 0.01 * | 0.74 | TI > CI | |
Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation; ES = effect size; TI = traditional intervention; CI = creative intervention; * p-value < 0.05.