| Literature DB >> 36139103 |
Nurulhuda Mustafa1, Muhamad Irfan Azaman2, Giselle G K Ng3, Wee Joo Chng1,2,4.
Abstract
CD38 was first discovered as a T-cell antigen and has since been found ubiquitously expressed in various hematopoietic cells, including plasma cells, NK cells, B cells, and granulocytes. More importantly, CD38 expression levels on malignant hematopoietic cells are significantly higher than counterpart healthy cells, thus presenting itself as a promising therapeutic target. In fact, for many aggressive hematological cancers, including CLL, DLBCL, T-ALL, and NKTL, CD38 expression is significantly associated with poorer prognosis and a hyperproliferative or metastatic phenotype. Studies have shown that, beyond being a biomarker, CD38 functionally mediates dysregulated survival, adhesion, and migration signaling pathways, as well as promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment conducive for tumors to thrive. Thus, targeting CD38 is a rational approach to overcoming these malignancies. However, clinical trials have surprisingly shown that daratumumab monotherapy has not been very effective in these other blood malignancies. Furthermore, extensive use of daratumumab in MM is giving rise to a subset of patients now refractory to daratumumab treatment. Thus, it is important to consider factors modulating the determinants of response to CD38 targeting across different blood malignancies, encompassing both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels so that we can diversify the strategy to enhance daratumumab therapeutic efficacy, which can ultimately improve patient outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: CD38; blood malignancies; daratumumab; drug combination; extracellular vesicles; immunotherapy; miRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36139103 PMCID: PMC9496523 DOI: 10.3390/biom12091261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Functional roles of CD38. CD38 can mediate adhesion through binding with (1) hyaluronic acid in the extracellular matrix or through (2) binding with its cognate ligand CD31 to mediate adhesion and transendothelial migration. (3) Importantly, the ecto-enzymatic domain of CD38 catabolizes NAD+ into cADPR, which can enter the cell to mobilize calcium stores and modulate numerous cell signaling pathways. cADPR can also be hydrolyzed to ADPR, and then subsequently adenosine upon colocalization with CD73/203a. Adenosine is bound to purinergic receptors to suppress NK and T-cell activation.
Schematic overview of oncogenic mechanisms mediated by CD38 in different blood malignancies.
| CD38 Function | How This Is Hijacked to Promote Cancer | Type of Blood Malignancy |
|---|---|---|
|
| Elevated levels of adenosine suppress activity of effector immune cells and stimulate activity of regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells | MM, DLBCL, T-ALL |
| Increased enzymatic activity increases production of cADPR and NAADP calcium messengers, which promote survival, trafficking, and homing | MM, CLL, AML | |
|
| Formation of nanotubes to mediate mitochondrial transfer from BMSC to promote oxidative phosphorylation | MM |
|
| Increased expression on immune suppressor cells, which intensifies cell suppressive phenotype and promotes formation of immune-suppressive tumor niches | MM, CLL |
| Chemokine-mediated migration towards proliferative niches | CLL, AML | |
| Colocalization with other receptors to directly transduce survival signaling | CLL | |
| Biomarker for poor prognosis | CLL, MCL, DLBCL, PTCL, NKTL |
MM, multiple myeloma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; NKTL, natural killer T-cell lymphoma.
Figure 2A broad spectrum of mechanisms of action of daratumumab. Daratumumab triggers Fc-dependent immune effector mechanisms that comprise of CDC, ADCC, and ADCP. The Fc tail of daratumumab with the Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) present on immune effector cells leads to activation of these immune cells and subsequent lytic killing of MM cells. Lysis and depletion of CD38+ immune suppressor cells, such as Tregs, also occur via the same process, leading to immunomodulation of the tumor niche and clonal expansion of cytotoxic T cell. CD38–daratumumab complexes that are formed are transferred from MM cells to monocytes and granulocyte in a process known as trogocytosis, thereby modulating CD38 expression on immune cells.
Key clinical studies of CD38-targeting antibodies in hematological malignancies.
| Tumor Type | Study Title | Phase | Drug Regimen | Median PFS | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | NCT02076009, POLLUX | 3 | Dara-Len-Dex vs. Len-Dex | 44.5 vs. 17.5 months | [ |
| NCT03180736, APOLLO | 3 | Dara-Pom-Dex vs. Pom-Dex | 12.4 vs. 6.9 months | [ | |
| NCT02136134, CASTOR | 3 | Dara-Bort-Dex vs. Bort-Dex | 60.7 vs. 26.9 months | [ | |
| NCT03158688, CANDOR | 3 | Dara-Carfil-Dex vs. Carfil-Dex | 28.6 vs. 15.2 months | [ | |
| NCT01749969 | 1b | Isa-Len-Dex | 8.5 months | [ | |
| NCT02990338, ICARIA-MM | 3 | Isa-Pom-Dex vs. Pom-Dex | 11.5 vs. 6.5 months | [ | |
| NCT03275285, IKEMA | 3 | Isa-Carfilz-Dex vs. Carfilz-Dex | 35.7 vs. 19.2 months | [ | |
| NCT01421186 | 1b/2a | MOR202-Len-Dex | not reached after 24 months | [ | |
| NCT01421186 | 1b/2a | MOR202-Pom-Dex vs. Mor Dex | 17.5 vs. 8.4 months | [ | |
| NKTL | NCT02927925 | 2 | Dara single agent | 55 days | [ |
| MCL, DLBCL, FL | NCT02413489, CARINA | 2 | Dara single agent | Terminated as futility thresholds were not reached (FL ORR 50%), (DLBCL ORR 30%) | [ |
| T ALL, TLBL | NCT02999633 | 2 | Isa single agent | Terminated; unsatisfactory benefit/risk ratio, 11/14 developed progressive disease as best response. | [ |
Dara, daratumumab; Len, lenalidomide; Dex, dexamethasone; Pom, pomalidomide; Bort, bortezomib; Isa, isatuximab, Carfilz. Carfilzomib PFS, progression-free survival; ORR, overall response rate; TLBL, T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.
Figure 3Molecular strategies to enhance CD38 expression and overall antitumor efficacy of Daratumumab. A. Transcriptional upregulation of the CD38 mRNA and subsequent protein expression can be stimulated by ATRA, HDAC inhibitors (panobinostat and ricolinostat), STAT3 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) and immunomodulatory drugs (pomalidomide and lenalidomide). B. CD38 mRNA can be degraded by miR-26a and miR-140-3p through direct binding to the 3’UTR or indirectly through the cytokine mediated mechanisms. These miRs can be targeted through antisense oligonucleotides to prevent CD38 mRNA degradation. C. Optimization of CD38 availability on the cell surface membrane by modulating processes involved in extracellular vesicle formation or trogocytosis.