Literature DB >> 27705267

Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.

Meletios A Dimopoulos1, Albert Oriol1, Hareth Nahi1, Jesus San-Miguel1, Nizar J Bahlis1, Saad Z Usmani1, Neil Rabin1, Robert Z Orlowski1, Mieczyslaw Komarnicki1, Kenshi Suzuki1, Torben Plesner1, Sung-Soo Yoon1, Dina Ben Yehuda1, Paul G Richardson1, Hartmut Goldschmidt1, Donna Reece1, Steen Lisby1, Nushmia Z Khokhar1, Lisa O'Rourke1, Christopher Chiu1, Xiang Qin1, Mary Guckert1, Tahamtan Ahmadi1, Philippe Moreau1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab showed promising efficacy alone and with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in a phase 1-2 study involving patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 569 patients with multiple myeloma who had received one or more previous lines of therapy to receive lenalidomide and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or in combination with daratumumab (daratumumab group). The primary end point was progression-free survival.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 13.5 months in a protocol-specified interim analysis, 169 events of disease progression or death were observed (in 53 of 286 patients [18.5%] in the daratumumab group vs. 116 of 283 [41.0%] in the control group; hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.52; P<0.001 by stratified log-rank test). The Kaplan-Meier rate of progression-free survival at 12 months was 83.2% (95% CI, 78.3 to 87.2) in the daratumumab group, as compared with 60.1% (95% CI, 54.0 to 65.7) in the control group. A significantly higher rate of overall response was observed in the daratumumab group than in the control group (92.9% vs. 76.4%, P<0.001), as was a higher rate of complete response or better (43.1% vs. 19.2%, P<0.001). In the daratumumab group, 22.4% of the patients had results below the threshold for minimal residual disease (1 tumor cell per 105 white cells), as compared with 4.6% of those in the control group (P<0.001); results below the threshold for minimal residual disease were associated with improved outcomes. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 during treatment were neutropenia (in 51.9% of the patients in the daratumumab group vs. 37.0% of those in the control group), thrombocytopenia (in 12.7% vs. 13.5%), and anemia (in 12.4% vs. 19.6%). Daratumumab-associated infusion-related reactions occurred in 47.7% of the patients and were mostly of grade 1 or 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide and dexamethasone significantly lengthened progression-free survival among patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Daratumumab was associated with infusion-related reactions and a higher rate of neutropenia than the control therapy. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; POLLUX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02076009 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27705267     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  399 in total

1.  Critical Appraisal of Published Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses of Competing Interventions for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Shannon Cope; Kabirraaj Toor; Evan Popoff; Rafael Fonseca; Ola Landgren; María-Victoria Mateos; Katja Weisel; Jeroen Paul Jansen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial.

Authors:  Peter M Voorhees; Jonathan L Kaufman; Jacob Laubach; Douglas W Sborov; Brandi Reeves; Cesar Rodriguez; Ajai Chari; Rebecca Silbermann; Luciano J Costa; Larry D Anderson; Nitya Nathwani; Nina Shah; Yvonne A Efebera; Sarah A Holstein; Caitlin Costello; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Tanya M Wildes; Robert Z Orlowski; Kenneth H Shain; Andrew J Cowan; Sean Murphy; Yana Lutska; Huiling Pei; Jon Ukropec; Jessica Vermeulen; Carla de Boer; Daniela Hoehn; Thomas S Lin; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Approach to the treatment of the older, unfit patient with myeloma from diagnosis to relapse: perspectives of a US hematologist and a geriatric hematologist.

Authors:  Tanya M Wildes; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 4.  Daratumumab for the treatment of AL amyloidosis.

Authors:  M Hasib Sidiqi; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-07-22

5.  Outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Lauren W Veltri; Denái R Milton; Ruby Delgado; Nina Shah; Krina Patel; Yago Nieto; Partow Kebriaei; Uday R Popat; Simrit Parmar; Betul Oran; Stefan Ciurea; Chitra Hosing; Hans C Lee; Elisabet Manasanch; Robert Z Orlowski; Elizabeth J Shpall; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Pomalidomide-dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of a multi-cohort phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  S Ailawadhi; J R Mikhael; B R LaPlant; K M Laumann; S Kumar; V Roy; D Dingli; P L Bergsagel; F K Buadi; S V Rajkumar; R Fonseca; M A Gertz; P Kapoor; T Sher; S R Hayman; A K Stewart; A Dispenzieri; R A Kyle; W I Gonsalves; C B Reeder; Y Lin; R S Go; N Leung; T Kourelis; J A Lust; S J Russell; A A Chanan-Khan; M Q Lacy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Novel Treatments for Multiple Myeloma: What Role Do They Have in Older Adults?

Authors:  Hira S Mian; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Immunologic approaches for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Niels Weinhold; Gareth J Morgan; Frits van Rhee; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  CAR T Cells with Enhanced Sensitivity to B Cell Maturation Antigen for the Targeting of B Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Julia Bluhm; Elisa Kieback; Stephen F Marino; Felix Oden; Jörg Westermann; Markus Chmielewski; Hinrich Abken; Wolfgang Uckert; Uta E Höpken; Armin Rehm
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Daratumumab plus CyBorD for patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: safety run-in results of ANDROMEDA.

Authors:  Giovanni Palladini; Efstathios Kastritis; Mathew S Maurer; Jeffrey Zonder; Monique C Minnema; Ashutosh D Wechalekar; Arnaud Jaccard; Hans C Lee; Naresh Bumma; Jonathan L Kaufman; Eva Medvedova; Tibor Kovacsovics; Michael Rosenzweig; Vaishali Sanchorawala; Xiang Qin; Sandra Y Vasey; Brendan M Weiss; Jessica Vermeulen; Giampaolo Merlini; Raymond L Comenzo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.