Alekos A Theologis1, Hao-Hua Wu1, Mohammad Diab2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), Floor 05, Room 5430, Box 3212, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), Floor 05, Room 5430, Box 3212, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. mohammad.diab@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare direct costs of index and revision operations of thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusion (TPSIF) and thoracic anterior spinal tethering (TAST) for adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis in children. METHODS: Children (ages 11-18 years) who underwent TPSIF and TAST (2/2013-9/2019) were reviewed. Follow-up < 2 years and cervical instrumentation and/or instrumentation of a lumbar level at L3 or below were exclusion criteria. Patient demographics, radiographic curve magnitude, index operations and postoperative data, as well as indications for revisions/readmissions were collected. Direct costs were identified and compared for index and revision operations during follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were included (TPSIF: 78; TAST: 25). TAST procedures were performed in children significantly younger and for smaller curve magnitudes. They had significantly fewer levels instrumented, shorter operating room (OR) times, and less estimated blood loss (EBL). After operation, a significantly higher percentage of TAST were admitted to ICU. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was similar between groups. Index operations' average direct costs were significantly higher for TAST than TPSIF ($52,947 v. $46,641; p = 0.02). Major cost drivers for both groups were implants, OR services, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and room/board. Revisions following TAST were more frequent than for TPSIF (36 v. 11.5%). Majority of TPSIF revisions were for junctional deformity. Curve progression and overcorrection were most common reason for TAST revisions. Average direct costs for revisions/readmissions were similar between groups (TPSIF: $28,485 v. TAST: $27,590; p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Index operations' average direct costs were statistically similar between TPSIF and TAST for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Major cost drivers were implants, OR services, PACU, and room/board. TAST index operations' direct costs and associated direct costs for implants and room/board were significantly higher, while their anesthesia and OR services were significantly lower than TPSIF. TAST revisions were for overcorrection and curve progression, while TPSIF revisions were most commonly for junctional deformity. Overall average direct costs for revisions were similar despite revision rates being higher for TAST. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: To compare direct costs of index and revision operations of thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusion (TPSIF) and thoracic anterior spinal tethering (TAST) for adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis in children. METHODS: Children (ages 11-18 years) who underwent TPSIF and TAST (2/2013-9/2019) were reviewed. Follow-up < 2 years and cervical instrumentation and/or instrumentation of a lumbar level at L3 or below were exclusion criteria. Patient demographics, radiographic curve magnitude, index operations and postoperative data, as well as indications for revisions/readmissions were collected. Direct costs were identified and compared for index and revision operations during follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were included (TPSIF: 78; TAST: 25). TAST procedures were performed in children significantly younger and for smaller curve magnitudes. They had significantly fewer levels instrumented, shorter operating room (OR) times, and less estimated blood loss (EBL). After operation, a significantly higher percentage of TAST were admitted to ICU. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was similar between groups. Index operations' average direct costs were significantly higher for TAST than TPSIF ($52,947 v. $46,641; p = 0.02). Major cost drivers for both groups were implants, OR services, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and room/board. Revisions following TAST were more frequent than for TPSIF (36 v. 11.5%). Majority of TPSIF revisions were for junctional deformity. Curve progression and overcorrection were most common reason for TAST revisions. Average direct costs for revisions/readmissions were similar between groups (TPSIF: $28,485 v. TAST: $27,590; p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Index operations' average direct costs were statistically similar between TPSIF and TAST for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Major cost drivers were implants, OR services, PACU, and room/board. TAST index operations' direct costs and associated direct costs for implants and room/board were significantly higher, while their anesthesia and OR services were significantly lower than TPSIF. TAST revisions were for overcorrection and curve progression, while TPSIF revisions were most commonly for junctional deformity. Overall average direct costs for revisions were similar despite revision rates being higher for TAST. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Daniel G Hoernschemeyer; Melanie E Boeyer; Madeline E Robertson; Christopher M Loftis; John R Worley; Nicole M Tweedy; Sumit U Gupta; Dana L Duren; Christina M Holzhauser; Venkataraman M Ramachandran Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Abdullah Abdullah; Stefan Parent; Firoz Miyanji; Kevin Smit; Joshua Murphy; David Skaggs; Purnendu Gupta; Michael Vitale; Jean Ouellet; Neil Saran; Robert H Cho; Pediatric Spine Study Group; Ron El-Hawary Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Amer F Samdani; Robert J Ames; Jeff S Kimball; Joshua M Pahys; Harsh Grewal; Glenn J Pelletier; Randal R Betz Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Amer F Samdani; Joshua M Pahys; Robert J Ames; Harsh Grewal; Glenn J Pelletier; Steven W Hwang; Randal R Betz Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Alice Baroncini; Per David Trobisch; Christof Birkenmaier; Stephanie Da Paz; Filippo Migliorini Journal: Z Orthop Unfall Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 1.108
Authors: Paul R P Rushton; Luigi Nasto; Stefan Parent; Isabelle Turgeon; Sultan Aldebeyan; Firoz Miyanji Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.468