PURPOSE: This retrospective chart review evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) at 1-year follow-up. Anterior VBT offers a fusionless treatment option for skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It is a growth-modulation technique, which utilizes patients' growth to attain progressive scoliosis correction. Numerous animal models support its promise; however, clinical data remain sparse. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data were retrospectively analyzed. We reviewed 32 patients who underwent thoracic VBT with a minimum one-year follow-up. Pertinent clinical and radiographic data were collected. ANOVA, Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were utilized to compare different time points. RESULTS: 32 patients with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (72 % female) with a minimum one-year follow-up were identified; mean age at surgery was 12 years. All patients were considered skeletally immature pre-operatively; mean Risser score 0.42, mean Sanders score 3.2. Patients underwent tethering of an average of 7.7 levels (range 7-11). Median blood loss was 100 cc. The mean pre-operative thoracic curve magnitude was 42.8° ± 8.0° which corrected to 21.0° ± 8.5° on first erect and 17.9° ± 11.4° at most recent. The pre-operative lumbar curve of 25.2° ± 7.3° demonstrated progressive correction (first erect = 18.0° ± 7.1°, 1 year = 12.6° ± 9.4°, p < 0.00001). Thoracic axial rotation measured 13.4° pre-operatively and 7.4° at the most recent measurement (p < 0.00001). One patient experienced prolonged atelectasis which required a bronchoscopy; otherwise, no major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our early results indicate that anterior VBT is a safe and potentially effective treatment option for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. These patients experienced an improvement of their scoliosis with minimal major complications. However, longer term follow-up of this cohort will reveal the true benefits of this promising technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PURPOSE: This retrospective chart review evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) at 1-year follow-up. Anterior VBT offers a fusionless treatment option for skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It is a growth-modulation technique, which utilizes patients' growth to attain progressive scoliosis correction. Numerous animal models support its promise; however, clinical data remain sparse. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data were retrospectively analyzed. We reviewed 32 patients who underwent thoracic VBT with a minimum one-year follow-up. Pertinent clinical and radiographic data were collected. ANOVA, Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were utilized to compare different time points. RESULTS: 32 patients with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (72 % female) with a minimum one-year follow-up were identified; mean age at surgery was 12 years. All patients were considered skeletally immature pre-operatively; mean Risser score 0.42, mean Sanders score 3.2. Patients underwent tethering of an average of 7.7 levels (range 7-11). Median blood loss was 100 cc. The mean pre-operative thoracic curve magnitude was 42.8° ± 8.0° which corrected to 21.0° ± 8.5° on first erect and 17.9° ± 11.4° at most recent. The pre-operative lumbar curve of 25.2° ± 7.3° demonstrated progressive correction (first erect = 18.0° ± 7.1°, 1 year = 12.6° ± 9.4°, p < 0.00001). Thoracic axial rotation measured 13.4° pre-operatively and 7.4° at the most recent measurement (p < 0.00001). One patient experienced prolonged atelectasis which required a bronchoscopy; otherwise, no major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our early results indicate that anterior VBT is a safe and potentially effective treatment option for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. These patients experienced an improvement of their scoliosis with minimal major complications. However, longer term follow-up of this cohort will reveal the true benefits of this promising technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Jeff B Pawelek; Tracey P Bastrom; Lawrence G Lenke; Thomas Lowe; Alvin Crawford; Randal Betz; Baron Lonner Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Daniel W Green; Thomas W Lawhorne; Roger F Widmann; Christopher K Kepler; Caitlin Ahern; Douglas N Mintz; Bernard A Rawlins; Stephen W Burke; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: James O Sanders; Richard H Browne; Sharon J McConnell; Susan A Margraf; Timothy E Cooney; David N Finegold Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Peter O Newton; Christine L Farnsworth; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Reid C Chambers; Eric Varley; Shunji Tsutsui Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Peter O Newton; Kevin B Fricka; Steven S Lee; Christine L Farnsworth; Tyler G Cox; Andrew T Mahar Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Eric N Feins; Yuhan Lee; Eoin D O'Cearbhaill; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Shogo Shimada; Ingeborg Friehs; Douglas Perrin; Peter E Hammer; Haruo Yamauchi; Gerald Marx; Andrew Gosline; Veaceslav Arabagi; Jeffrey M Karp; Pedro J Del Nido Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 25.671